Evolutionary reason for massive difference in size between male and female giant moa revealed

Moa's ark
Emu. Credit: (c) Zoological Society of London

Some of the largest female birds in the world were almost twice as big as their male mates. Research carried out by the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) shows that this amazing size difference in giant moa was not due to any specific environmental factors, but evolved simply as a result of scaling-up of smaller differences in male and female body size shown by their smaller-bodied ancestors.

The paper is published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

In an environment lacking large mammals, New Zealand's (Dinornis) evolved to be one of the biggest species of bird ever, with females weighing more than two hundred kilograms – the same as about 3 average sized men.

Male and often show differences in body size, with males typically being larger. However some birds, like many ratites – large, flightless species such as and cassowaries – are the opposite, with the females towering over the males.

Evolutionary reason for massive difference in size between male and female giant moa revealed
Sir Richard Owen with skeleton of Dinornis. Credit: (c) Zoological Society of London

Moa were huge flightless ratites. Several different species inhabited New Zealand's forests, and mountains until about 700 years ago. However, the first Polynesian settlers became a moa-hunting culture, and rapidly drove all of these species to extinction.

Dr Samuel Turvey, ZSL Senior Research Fellow and lead author on the paper, says: "We compared patterns of body mass within an evolutionary framework for both extinct and living ratites. Females becoming much larger was an odd side-effect of the scaling up of overall body size in moa.

"A lack of large – such as elephants, bison and antelope – allowed New Zealand's birds to grow in size and fill these empty large herbivore niches. Moa evolved to become truly huge, and this accentuated the existing size differences between as the whole animal scaled up in size over time," Dr Turvey added.

Future research should investigate whether similar scaling relationships can also help to explain the evolution of bizarre structures shown by other now-extinct species, such as the elongated canines of sabretoothed cats.

Giant Moa

The giant moa (Dinornis) was an extinct genus of ratite birds belonging to the order Dinornithiformes. The giant moa was endemic to New Zealand, and may have been the tallest bird that ever lived (females of the largest species could reach up to 12ft tall) as well as one of the most massive, weighing between 230 and 280 kilograms in various estimates. Dinornis seems to have had the most pronounced sexual dimorphism of all moa, with females being around 150% as tall and 280% as heavy as males.


Explore further

DNA suggests Moa once flew

More information: rspb.royalsocietypublishing.or … .1098/rspb.2013.0401
Citation: Evolutionary reason for massive difference in size between male and female giant moa revealed (2013, April 9) retrieved 16 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-04-evolutionary-massive-difference-size-male.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 10, 2013
Several different species inhabited New Zealand's forests, grasslands and mountains until about 700 years ago. However, the first Polynesian settlers became a moa-hunting culture, and rapidly drove all of these species to extinction.


It's interesting that so many large animals of every type were hunted to extinction by humans long before historical times, or at least before industrial times.

It seems obvious what happened here: Large herbivorous bird makes an excellent meal and is probably stupid, as non-flight birds tend to be very stupid compared to flight birds.

With no regulations, hungry people would keep poaching the Moa even as they realized there weren't enough of them around any more.

Say you lose 40% to bone and non-edible entrails and such, then you have 60% edible meat, which would be as much as 120kg. You could feed an entire tribe of people with that, yet it's still small enough to not be particularly risky to hunt, with say a spear or bow...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more