Female animals portrayed as 'femme fatales' by researchers

Female animals are unfairly sexually stereotyped by researchers, according to experts at the University of St Andrews.

In a new report, the study suggests that cultural stereotypes may influence how we view animal .

Anthropomorphism – making animals seem like us – is a common problem for animal behaviour researchers. The effects can be quite obvious – giving animals human-like emotions for instance – or more subtle, using human cultural conventions or stereotypes to describe behaviour.

For instance, recent work has suggested that when it comes to sexual behaviour, researchers sometimes fall into a rather Victorian stereotype of the : males are considered dominant, strong and aggressive, whereas females are described as submissive, weak and passive. However, these stereotypes at best fail to capture the reality of male-female or at worst are just plain wrong.

Emily Burdfield-Steel, a member of the research group, said: "Our work suggests that scientists are not immune to cultural stereotypes and we need to think carefully about the words we use and what they convey."

The most obvious example where such stereotypes are wrong is sexual cannibalism: where it is females that are active killing, and eating males before or during sex.

So is the sexual cannibalism literature free of human stereotypes? To explore this question, researchers at the University of St Andrews compared the language used to describe sexual cannibalism, surveying the scientific literature on sexual and recording the words used to describe .

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the researchers found that females were more likely to be described with active words and males with reactive words.

More surprisingly though many of the words used to describe females, while active, were also rather negative. 

For example, females were described as "aggressive", "voracious" and "rapacious". Use of these words suggests that researchers risk perpetuating a negative stereotype of sexually aggressive females, akin to that of the femme fatale in noir cinema.

Their results are published online in .

Explore further

Researchers find gender bias in sexual cannibalism papers

More information: www.sciencedirect.com/science/ … ii/S000334721200557X
Journal information: Animal Behaviour

Citation: Female animals portrayed as 'femme fatales' by researchers (2013, March 1) retrieved 23 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-03-female-animals-portrayed-femme-fatales.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 01, 2013
Really interesting article, and good research. But, still seems biased, and here is why.

They note in the journal that the females were larger than the males for all species reviewed. For this to really have a strong argument, we need to see that the ratio of F/M cannibalism occurring is close to equal, where approximately half of the articles are based on (f) eating (m), and vice-versa. If all of the females are bigger in all of the articles reviewed and a majority of cannibalism occurring is (f) eating (m) in the research, then one cannot conclude that the researchers have a gender bias, as there is not adequate information to compare it to.

Do not mistake me, I am not disagreeing. I think its solid research. But, if they can balance out the sources and find more articles based on cannibalism of (m) eating (f), and factor out papers by the same researcher, you can draw a VERY strong conclusion that can used and applied to other realms and all sorts of other areas of research.

Mar 01, 2013
What was the ratio of m:f researchers accused of bias? How do their individual responses compare?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more