Does increased exposure to a piece of art make us like it more?

March 4, 2013, University of Leeds

When it comes to judging art, beauty may not just be in the eye of the beholder, according to a study from the University of Leeds.

The research challenges the idea that what people value in is largely what they are used to, or that people will come to like any image if they see it enough times.

Instead, the study's findings suggest that increased exposure to art works does not necessarily make people like them more and that the quality of an art work remains at the heart of its evaluation. 

Dr Aaron Meskin from the University of Leeds, who co-led the study, explained: "People have always questioned how curators and critics judge art work or arrive at a consensus about . We wanted to see if it's true that the more times someone is exposed to artwork, the more they prefer it, and that people will come to like whatever images they are exposed to, good or bad."

The team of researchers at the University of Leeds exposed study groups to two sets of paintings, for different lengths of time, before asking them to express a degree of liking. The two artists under the spotlight were English Pre-Raphaelite painter, John Everett Millais, and American painter, Thomas Kinkade.

Co-lead author Professor Matthew Kieran, said: "Choosing Millais' and Kinkade's landscapes made for a natural contrast, with Millais' work representing 'good art' having previously been described as 'misty evocations', whereas Kinkade's work, which one reviewer dubbed 'a kitsch crime against ', represents 'bad art'." 

The findings revealed that people responded differently to Kinkade paintings than to Millais' paintings when faced with varying levels of exposure.

 "The fact that Kinkade's paintings were liked less and Millais' were liked more after exposure suggests that quality, and not just , remains in the picture," continued Professor Kieran.

Mark Phelan from Lawrence University in Wisconsin, who worked with the team from the University of Leeds to analyse the results, added: "This work constitutes more than a grudge match between high and popular art. At issue is the role that artistic quality plays in determining our aesthetic tastes. When we make evaluative judgements of art works, we continue to be sensitive to what is good or bad." 

Over 100 students from the University of Leeds took part in the experiment. Midway through classes, an experimental group was shown images of paintings - some once, some four or five times -  whereas a control group was not. During a ratings phase, both groups were shown all images and asked to express how much they liked each painting.

The research replicated the basic pattern used by psychologist James Cutting in 2003, who briefly exposed undergraduate psychology students to less-known Impressionist paintings and found that exposure significantly increased preferences for the works. 

The team at the University of Leeds, who questioned these findings because all the used in Cutting's study were deemed of high artistic quality, set about testing whether increased exposure to both 'good' and 'bad' art would determine peoples' preferences.

The findings, "Mere Exposure to Bad Art," are published today in the British Journal of Aesthetics by Oxford University Press.

Explore further: A bird's eye view of art

Related Stories

A bird's eye view of art

June 30, 2009

Pigeons could be art critics yet, according to a new study which shows that like humans, pigeons can be trained to tell the difference between 'good' and 'bad' paintings. According to Professor Shigeru Watanabe from Keio ...

Pigeons have eye for paintings: Japan study

June 25, 2009

Pigeons may sometimes appear to randomly target city sculptures with their droppings, but according to a new Japanese study they also have the potential to become discerning art critics.

Google Art Project premieres upgrades in Chicago

April 3, 2012

(AP) -- High technology merged with high culture Tuesday at The Art Institute of Chicago when Google Inc. announced an upgrade to its Google Art Project initiative, adding thousands of works in dozens more countries.

Recommended for you

Nano-droplets are the key to controlling membrane formation

February 19, 2019

The creation of membranes is of enormous importance in biology, but also in many chemical applications developed by humans. These membranes are shaped spontaneously when soap-like molecules in water join together. Researchers ...

LOFAR radio telescope reveals secrets of solar storms

February 19, 2019

An international team of scientists led by a researcher from Trinity College Dublin and University of Helsinki announced a major discovery on the very nature of solar storms in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Pottery reveals America's first social media networks

February 19, 2019

Long before Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook and even MySpace, early Mississippian Mound cultures in America's southern Appalachian Mountains shared artistic trends and technologies across regional networks that functioned in ...

Observation of quantized heating in quantum matter

February 19, 2019

Shaking a physical system typically heats it up, in the sense that the system continuously absorbs energy. When considering a circular shaking pattern, the amount of energy that is absorbed can potentially depend on the orientation ...

Lobster's underbelly is as tough as industrial rubber

February 19, 2019

Flip a lobster on its back, and you'll see that the underside of its tail is split in segments connected by a translucent membrane that appears rather vulnerable when compared with the armor-like carapace that shields the ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Mar 04, 2013
No. Not if it is "modern art".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.