Analysis of rhetoric and policy

January 24, 2013, Rutgers University

As an English major, Natalie Midiri has an appreciation for the art of the written and spoken word.
The Rutgers–Camden senior knows rhetoric can influence and inspire people, especially when coming from world leaders and public figures.

Midiri took a closer look at one important for an article to be published Jan. 31 in the journal Young Scholars in Writing: Undergraduate Research in Writing and Rhetoric.

In her article "The Stylistic Effects of Human Rights Rhetoric: An Analysis of U.S. Secretary of State 's 2011 LGBT Human Rights Speech," Midiri analyzes the historic international gay rights speech Clinton delivered in Switzerland to the United Nations in December 2011.

"Rhetorical style is relevant in public discussions where arguments could influence subsequent policy decisions," says Midiri, a Mount Laurel resident. "I'm in love with Clinton's speech. I think it's a well-crafted speech, but in my article, I'm critical of it."

In her speech, Clinton talks about the work required to protect LGBT people whose are still denied in many parts of the world today.

"In this speech, Clinton is speaking to American legislators, U.N. representatives, and lawmakers in Uganda, where virtually no legal protections are offered to LGBT people," Midiri says. "Her message is clear, but I think in her speech, there's a distinct separation between the LGBT community and those who are in power. It's delivered in a way that maintains that the LGBT community is voiceless or that it is segregated from the greater community."

Midiri says it wasn't intentional, but Clinton's speech could have provided examples of LGBT people in leadership positions.

"Speeches like Clinton's effect how public policy decisions are framed moving forward, so the rhetoric needs to be accessible to all audiences," she says.

Midiri submitted her article to Young Scholars in Writing, a refereed journal funded by the University of Missouri-Kansas City's College of Arts and Sciences and English Department.

"I've learned so much about academic writing through the Young Scholars in Writing program," Midiri says. "Communicating one-on-one with an editor has been a great experience for me. Creative was never my thing, but when I realized I could write about and be published as an undergraduate, I was sold on majoring in English."

This March, Midiri will present a project about undergraduate research in the humanities at the Conference on College Composition and Communication in Las Vegas. She has also co-written an article on the same subject with William FitzGerald, an assistant professor of English at Rutgers–Camden.  

"His mentorship, as well as the experience I've had at Rutgers–Camden, has been invaluable."

After graduating from Rutgers–Camden in May, Midiri hopes to continue her education and pursue her master's degree in rhetorical studies.

Explore further: Great speeches: How to know one if we hear one

Related Stories

Obama, Bill Clinton have common ground

April 30, 2008

The Democratic primary contest may have placed them on opposing sides, but presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton have more in common than their voter party registration cards.

US did not seek WikiLeaks cutoff: Clinton

February 15, 2011

The United States did not pressure private companies to deny service to WikiLeaks following its release of secret US diplomatic cables, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday.

Virtual reality can yield real legal woes

March 19, 2008

What your avatar does in an online fantasy world may very well land you in court. As virtual worlds increasingly generate real-world legal disputes, a cyberlaw scholar at the Rutgers School of Law—Camden is authoring a ...

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on ancient human-turkey relationship

January 17, 2018

For the first time, research has uncovered the origins of the earliest domestic turkeys in ancient Mexico. The study also suggests turkeys weren't only prized for their meat—with demand for the birds soaring with the Mayans ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 24, 2013
I don't think politicians care, or need to care, about rhetorics:
On May 12, 1996, Albright defended UN sanctions against Iraq on a 60 Minutes segment in which Lesley Stahl asked her "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" and Albright replied "we think the price is worth it."
See http://en.wikiped...lbright.
1 / 5 (1) Jan 24, 2013
I don't think politicians care, or need to care, about rhetorics

I agree. Because no one listens to them, anyhow. By now everyone knows that politicians aren't experts in anything - so who would expect them to say anything that experts haven't expressed much more succinctly and with better understanding?

At least I can't remember anyone ever saying: "I don't know anything about subject X - so I'll wait until politician Y gives a speech on it"

Politicians are faces - designed for 'brand recognition'. Much like Hollywood 'stars' these days. Ability (rethoric or acting respectively) is entirely besides the point.
not rated yet Jan 28, 2013
Well, frajo, to understand Albright's position here, you only need to read the first paragraph under Early Life in your own link here.

But it's a good thing understanding doesn't mean we have to agree with her!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.