Apple "pinch-to-zoom" patent deemed invalid

People walk through the Apple retail store in Grand Central Terminal on December 10, 2012 in New York City.
People walk through the Apple retail store in Grand Central Terminal on December 10, 2012 in New York City. A filing in a high-stakes legal battle between Samsung and Apple revealed that a "pinch-to-zoom" patent central to the case has been deemed invalid.

A filing in a high-stakes legal battle between Samsung and Apple revealed that a "pinch-to-zoom" patent central to the case has been deemed invalid.

The patent was a centerpiece of a trial that ended in August with a jury ordering Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion in damages for illegally copying iPhone and iPad features for its flagship Galaxy S smartphones.

Samsung provided US Lucy Koh a copy of a preliminary determination that, upon review, the Apple pinch-to-zoom technology wasn't original enough to merit a patent.

Samsung hoped the filing would bolster its argument for a new trial or to have the slashed.

Since the verdict, US patent officials tentatively invalidated an Apple patent on technology that gives a "rubber-band" springing effect when a finger tugs at the edge of a touch-screen smartphone. That patent was also at issue at trial.

Koh on Monday denied Apple's request to ban a set of Samsung smartphones from the US market based on the jury's finding that the South Korean firm was guilty of infringing on six of the Cupertino, California-company's patents.

Even though Apple was victorious in the patent case, the and iPad maker failed to prove that the technology at issue was the driving factor in people's buying decisions, Koh reasoned in the ruling.

Samsung—the world's top mobile and smartphone maker—has appealed the verdict.


Explore further

Apple patent wielded against Samsung possibly invalid

(c) 2012 AFP

Citation: Apple "pinch-to-zoom" patent deemed invalid (2012, December 20) retrieved 21 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-12-apple-pinch-to-zoom-patent-deemed-invalid.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 20, 2012
I used to be a fan of Apple in the Jobs era. Now the company disgusts me. It has turned into a patent troll and it is obvious that they don't see themselves surviving post-Jobs in much the same way. I hope they give up this insane trolling and get back to making good products that people want.

Dec 20, 2012
Exactly what I think

Dec 20, 2012
Could it be that Steven Paul Jobs was the glue that held it all together?

Dec 20, 2012
I used to be a fan of Apple in the Jobs era. Now the company disgusts me. It has turned into a patent troll

Turned out? Apple has been patent trolling for more than a decade. Jobs was very much instrumental in starting this. This is just the latest in a looooong series of patent suits and ridiculous stuff Apple has patented.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more