Warmer climates don't necessarily mean more fertile soils, study says

November 1, 2012 by Brian Wallheimer, Purdue University

(Phys.org)—Warmer climates won't necessarily speed the return of nitrogen to soils as scientists once thought, according to a Purdue University study.

Increased temperatures from climate change have been expected to speed decomposition of plant materials and the return of nitrogen to soils, making the soil more fertile for plants. But Jeff Dukes, an associate professor of forestry and natural resources at Purdue, found that the microbes responsible for returning nitrogen to soils react differently to a range of climate scenarios.

"More nitrogen being available is not something we can count on in all ecosystems," said Dukes, whose findings were published in the journal .

The findings suggest that while warming has been expected to accelerate nitrogen cycling, it may actually have little to no effect on the process in some ecosystems. This means that climate models that assume increased in warmer conditions may overestimate the amount of in those ecosystems.

Dukes runs the Boston-Area , which measures ecosystem responses to climate change. His research group uses heaters, plastic roofs and sprinklers to change the climate over small plots of land and then tests plant and soil responses to increases in temperature and increases or decreases in precipitation.

In this experiment, Dukes tested 36 plots under 12 different - four levels of warming and three different levels of precipitation - over two years.

Although Dukes and his team expected to find that warming would speed the return of nitrogen to the soil, they instead found that warming and changes in precipitation rarely influenced this rate. Instead, warming and drought caused the processes involved in nitrogen cycling to become less sensitive to temperature.

"It seems that some ecosystems are less responsive than we expected," Dukes said. "It may be that as you warm up, the soil microbes in those ecosystems adjust and the rate of nitrogen cycling winds up being the same."

Novem Auyeung, a doctoral student who was involved in the study, added, "Soil microbes operate on very short time scales, and many adjustments could have happened in the microbial community over the course of our two-year experiment."

Dukes said it would take further study to understand just how are affected by climate changes.

"These responses would have to be based on the abundance or composition of microbes or the activity of these microbes," Dukes said. "We need to learn which it is."

Dukes said he would like to test whether the results are similar in other soil types so that can accurately simulate these processes. 

"Soil fertility can affect carbon storage, and ultimately the rate of climate change," Dukes said. "I want to see how general this result is so that we can better predict how ecosystems will function in the future. If lots of work this way, then nature may not be as good at slowing as we had thought."

Explore further: Drought-exposed leaves adversely affect soil nutrients, study shows

More information: Warming and Drought Reduce Temperature Sensitivity of Nitrogen Transformations, Global Change Biology.

Shifts in nitrogen (N) mineralization and nitrification rates due to global changes can influence nutrient availability, which can affect terrestrial productivity and climate change feedbacks. While many single-factor studies have examined the effects of environmental changes on N mineralization and nitrification, few have examined these effects in a multi-factor context or recorded how these effects vary seasonally. In an old-field ecosystem in Massachusetts, USA, we investigated the combined effects of four levels of warming (up to 4°C) and three levels of precipitation (drought, ambient and wet) on net N mineralization, net nitrification and potential nitrification. We also examined the treatment effects on the temperature sensitivity of net N mineralization and net nitrification and the ratio of C mineralization to net N mineralization. During winter, freeze-thaw events, snow depth and soil freezing depth explained little of the variation in net nitrification and N mineralization rates among treatments. During two years of treatments, warming and altered precipitation rarely influenced the rates of N cycling, and there was no evidence of a seasonal pattern in the responses. In contrast, warming and drought dramatically decreased the apparent Q10 of net N mineralization and net nitrification, and the warming-induced decrease in apparent Q10 was more pronounced in ambient and wet treatments than the drought treatment. The ratio of C mineralization to net N mineralization varied over time and was sensitive to the interactive effects of warming and altered precipitation. Although many studies have found that warming tends accelerate N cycling, our results suggest that warming can have little to no effect on N cycling in some ecosystems. Thus, ecosystem models that assume that warming will consistently increase N mineralization rates and inputs of plant-available N may overestimate the increase in terrestrial productivity and the magnitude of an important negative feedback to climate change.

Related Stories

Climate change threatens permafrost in soil

September 20, 2012

In the coming century, permafrost in polar regions and alpine forests in the Northern Hemisphere may thaw rapidly, potentially releasing carbon and nitrogen that could cause additional regional warming. Permafrost occurs ...

Not-so-permanent permafrost

October 29, 2012

As much as 44 billion tons of nitrogen and 850 billion tons of carbon stored in arctic permafrost, or frozen ground, could be released into the environment as the region begins to thaw over the next century as a result of ...

Recommended for you

Glacial moulin formation triggered by rapid lake drainage

January 18, 2018

Scientists are uncovering the mystery of how, where and when important glacial features called moulins form on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Moulins, vertical conduits that penetrate through the half-mile-deep ice, efficiently ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (10) Nov 01, 2012
Re: Medieval Warm Period

"In Europe the warm conditions had positive effects. Summer after summer the harvests were good and the population increased rapidly. As a result thousands of hectares were cleared of woodland and farmers expanded their fields high into the hills and on mountain slopes. It was even possible to grow successfully grapes as far north as Yorkshire." - http://www.eh-res..._me.html]http://www.eh-res..._me.html[/url]

Re: The 535-36 event (period of cooling)

"This depressed temperatures, disrupted weather patterns, reduced biological productivity, including food crops, and resulted in famine and social disruption during the 6th century." - http://www.eh-res..._me.html]http://www.eh-res..._me.html[/url]

The evidence refutes the study.
3.4 / 5 (5) Nov 01, 2012
It is surprising how rapidly the U.S. grain belt is turning to into a desert.

4.3 / 5 (51) Nov 01, 2012
The AGW alarmists never tier of attaching another piece of string to their big ball of nothing.

Luckily, the rest of humanity is NOT reacting with the same delusion. The science is weak enough that the next generation will push this ball out of a plane.
5 / 5 (5) Nov 01, 2012
The evidence refutes the study.
No it does not, which means you either don't understand your own evidence, or don't understand the basics of the study you're aiming to refute.

Warmer climate in itself can extend growing seasons and plant productivity in certain climate belts where such aspects are temperature-constrained. That does not mean that the resulting productivity increases have anything to do with the soils becoming more nutrient-rich (the latter being the subject of the study you were attempting to refute.)
3.8 / 5 (6) Nov 02, 2012
Rain comes too late for Iowa's corn crop as drought weighs on midwest minds

Farmers hope for better next year after summer of record drought leads to rising prices and brings tensions to the surface


"The AGW alarmists never tier of attaching another piece of string to their big ball of nothing." - NumenTard

NumenTard relies on magical thinking when he composes his comments.

This is why they are more often wrong than right.
Shinobiwan Kenobi
5 / 5 (3) Nov 02, 2012
The AGW alarmists never tier of attaching another piece of string to their big ball of nothing. -Nou

The AGW denialists seem incapable of processing the content of these articles, if they even bother reading them at all, and never tire of touting their ignorance with cherry-picked data while under the delusion that people smarter than they just happen to have nothing better to do than team up with big-gubment to scare the pants off people. Head, meet sand. Perhaps while he's down there the rising seas will fill the cavity where his grey-matter has been absent.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.