How the negative trumps the positive in politics

November 1, 2012

Negatively framed political attitudes ("I don't like Obama") are stronger than positively framed attitudes ("I like Romney"), and this effect is strengthened when people think more deeply about the issues involved.

That is the finding of a paper published in the latest issue of the by George Bizer, a at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y.

Bizer and his co-authors Iris Žeželj (University of Belgrade) and Jamie Luguri (Yale University) presented participants with information about two fictional (though ostensibly real) candidates – one conservative, one liberal – for a position on a government board.

After reading about the two candidates, some participants were asked if they 'supported' or 'opposed' the liberal candidate and some were asked if they 'supported' or 'opposed' the conservative. When the candidates were vying for a local government board, participants who were led to frame their opinions negatively – regardless of their underlying – expressed more certainty about their attitudes than did participants who were led frame their opinions positively. When the candidates were vying for a distant government board, the effect did not emerge.

Follow-up experiments replicated these findings: Experiment 2 showed that opposers were more certain than supporters, but only when the participants were able to think carefully about the candidates, while Experiment 3 showed that the effect generalized to perceived importance.

Dr Bizer says: "Our prior research showed that framing an opinion in terms of yields stronger attitudes than does framing it in terms of support.

The most interesting point from our latest research is that this effect is actually stronger when people process the messages more deeply – when they are motivated and have been able to think about the issue. But when people are not motivated and able, the effect goes away. So, perhaps counter-intuitively, the people who care the most about the issues or seem more likely to be affected by the bias."

Explore further: Media coverage influences value of presidential debates for viewers, study finds

Related Stories

Exposure to U.S. flag moves voters to the right

July 26, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Expect even more flags at Republican campaign events. And if the Democrats were wise, they might well strip the stage of flags altogether, suggests a new Cornell study, the first to look at the political ...

Recommended for you

Metacognition training boosts gen chem exam scores

October 20, 2017

It's a lesson in scholastic humility: You waltz into an exam, confident that you've got a good enough grip on the class material to swing an 80 percent or so, maybe a 90 if some of the questions go your way.

Scientists see order in complex patterns of river deltas

October 19, 2017

River deltas, with their intricate networks of waterways, coastal barrier islands, wetlands and estuaries, often appear to have been formed by random processes, but scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other ...

Six degrees of separation: Why it is a small world after all

October 19, 2017

It's a small world after all - and now science has explained why. A study conducted by the University of Leicester and KU Leuven, Belgium, examined how small worlds emerge spontaneously in all kinds of networks, including ...

Ancient DNA offers new view on saber-toothed cats' past

October 19, 2017

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
not rated yet Nov 01, 2012
It's more efficient to choose in terms of "what's the worst that can happen" instead of comparing a long list of positive promises that probably won't be happening anyways.

It's easier to evaluate and be sure about things you don't like, than things you might like.
kochevnik
not rated yet Nov 01, 2012
This is basic dialectics. Imprison the gouym with polarized ideologies while you propose the only "solution" to solve the dilemma. You can laugh all the way to the bank and you know that ideology is simply a fence for your pet slaves. Jedis change ideologies like they change outfits.
Job001
1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2012
The simple point is most people probably vote against the worst choice.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2012
Politics is ALL about power and negativity should reign.
That was the lesson of Lord of the Rings. Gandalf said he would be tempted to use the power for good and was wise enough to reject it.

The only positive thing a politician can say is he will cut taxes and decrease the size and scope of the the govt.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.