The coastal conundrum: Balancing the costs of erosion vs. flooding

The coastal conundrum – balancing the costs of erosion v flooding

Ensuring continued flood protection for low lying coastal areas may mean sacrificing cliff top communities to the sea, experts reveal.

A study, carried out by scientists from the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and today awarded the 2012 Lloyd's Science of Risk prize for Climate Change research, shows how the benefits of protecting our coastline from erosion must be balanced against the impacts of .

Focussing on a 72km stretch of shoreline along the East Anglian coast, the team detail the interconnection between the two risks of erosion and flooding and show that in some cases, allowing natural erosion of coastlines could reduce the impact of flooding in surrounding areas associated with rising levels.

Richard Dawson, Professor of Earth Systems Engineering at Newcastle University, lead author of this study says the research – which will be further developed in a new book to be launched in Spring 2013 - highlights the trade-off between shoreline and other priorities.

"We know that sea levels are rising and will continue to do so over the 21st Century, what we don't know is by exactly how much, or how fast," he explains.

"That means we need flexible strategies in place so that we are ready whatever the climate throws at us in the future. These strategies must be coordinated and recognise the large scale connectivity of coastal processes – such as the movement of sand along the coastline.

"Given pressures of and large , coupled with increased pressure on finances, it seems unlikely we will be able to afford to protect every stretch of coastline. Land will be lost to the sea so we're going to have to make about what our priorities are."

Coastal defences put in place by Victorian engineers over a century ago have re-shaped the UK coastline, artificially protecting some areas but at the expense of beaches in adjacent areas.

This man-made situation increases the risk of flooding in low lying coastal settlements where beaches act as a natural flood defence. Beach levels can be artificially recharged but Professor Dawson says maintaining this indefinitely along large stretches of coastline is likely to be unsustainable.

" typify the environmental challenge our society faces - their beauty and economic opportunities attracts settlement and they include some of our most important ecosystems and most productive farmland. Yet this exposes us to hazards such as erosion and flooding which will be exacerbated by sea level rise.

"Clearly we can't, and wouldn't want to, remove all our sea defences but there are difficult tradeoffs to be made in prioritising coastal management measures.

"Our research provides a common platform to get all parties round the table – local residents, policy-makers, insurers, scientists and farmers to name but a few – to understand each other's perspectives, discuss potential compensatory arrangements, and collectively decide the best way forward."


Explore further

New model: Coastline erosion due to sea level rise greater than previously thought

More information: Dawson, R. et al., Integrated analysis of risks of coastal flooding and cliff erosion under scenarios of long term change, Climatic Change, Vol 95 pp249–288, Nov. 29, 2012. www.ncl.ac.uk/ceser/researchpr … nunderscenarios.html
Journal information: Climatic Change

Citation: The coastal conundrum: Balancing the costs of erosion vs. flooding (2012, November 30) retrieved 22 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-11-coastal-conundrum-erosion.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 30, 2012
I think that this is all about when and which first, rather than preventing destruction along land/sea boundaries. It is going to happen. Who goes first?

Nov 30, 2012
I think the better question is about who is going to pay to replace homes that were built on clearly eroding land. Personally, I think the government at some level should buy the land and help the former owners relocate to more solid surroundings. If they choose to rebuild, it should be made known that no one will bail the out next time.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more