In relationships based on mutuality, number of individuals involved can determine rate at which species evolve

September 24, 2012
The beginning of a beautiful friendship? In some interspecies relationships, ants "tend" to a single caterpillar, preventing it from being attacked by predators. In return for such protection services, they are rewarded with the larva's sugary secretions. New research has now shown that the rate of evolution in a mutualistic relationship does not depend only on the type of interactions, but also on the number of individuals involved. Credit: MPI for Chemical Ecology/ Ian Baldwin / Alexander Weinhold

(—The relationship between species determines how rapidly they evolve. Parasites and their hosts coevolve more rapidly, and partners in a mutualistic relationship can evolve more slowly. But this view is obviously too simplistic. The rate of evolution in a mutualistic relationship does not depend only on the type of interactions, but also on the number of individuals involved, according to a model developed by researchers of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany. Therefore, while partners can benefit from slow evolution if only two individuals interact, a higher rate of evolution may be favoured if several individuals are involved.

and hosts conduct an arms race with one another in which the parasite must constantly find new ways to circumvent the defensive measures of the host. As a result, they both constantly evolve. This is similar to the situation of the Red Queen in the book "Through the Looking Glass, and What Alice Found There" by British author Lewis Carroll, and is therefore labelled the . The counterpart to it is the Red King's Hypothesis, first posited in 2003: in , evolving more slowly can be favoured. This occurs, namely, when the partners behave egotistically in the beginning and then attempt to become more altruistic. The partner holding back and evolving more slowly benefits, as it does not have to invest anything in improving the partnership.

Up to now, researchers have explored the Red King Hypothesis only in models for which two individuals come into contact with one another. However, this does not reflect reality for the most part. It is much more often the case in nature that several individuals are in a relationship with one another. Thus, several protect a single butterfly larva in order to be rewarded with its honeydew. For the ant, the relationship is therefore between two individuals; however, from the perspective of the caterpillar, there are multiple partners interacting.

The scientists in Plön have therefore tested the Red King's Hypothesis in a multiplayer model. According to this, it was confirmed that the Red King's Hypothesis is only valid in pairwise mutualistic relationships. As soon as several parties are involved, it becomes considerably more complicated. "Then more rapid evolution can be favoured for a party as well," explains Chaitanya Gokhale from the Max Planck Institute for .

Explore further: Sexual reproduction works thanks to ever-evolving host, parasite relationships: study

More information: Chaitanya S. Gokhale and Arne Traulsen, Mutualism and evolutionary multiplayer games: revisiting the Red King, Proc. R. Soc. B published online 12 September 2012 (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2012. 1697

Related Stories

Scientists reveal driving force behind evolution

February 25, 2010

Scientists at the University of Liverpool have provided the first experimental evidence that shows that evolution is driven most powerfully by interactions between species, rather than adaptation to the environment.

Evolution may take giant leaps

December 11, 2009

( -- A new study of thousands of species of plants and animals suggests new species may arise from rare events instead of through an accumulation of small changes made in response to changes in the environment.

Recommended for you

Gene editing in the brain gets a major upgrade

October 19, 2017

Genome editing technologies have revolutionized biomedical science, providing a fast and easy way to modify genes. However, the technique allowing scientists to carryout the most precise edits, doesn't work in cells that ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.