Study shows why common explosive PETN sometimes fails
(Phys.org)—The explosive PETN has been around for a century and is used by everyone from miners to the military, but it took new research by Sandia National Laboratories to begin to discover key mechanisms behind what causes it to fail at small scales.
"Despite the fact explosives are in widespread use, there's still a lot to learn about how detonation begins and what properties of the explosive define the key detonation phenomena," said Alex Tappan of Sandia's Explosives Technology Group.
Explosives are typically studied by pressing powders into pellets; tests are then done to determine bulk properties. To create precise samples to characterize PETN at the mesoscale, the researchers developed a novel technique based on physical vapor deposition to create samples with varying thicknesses. That allowed them to study detonation behavior at the sub-millimeter scale and to determine that PETN detonation fails at a thickness roughly the width of a human hair. This provided a clue into what physical processes at the sub-millimeter level might dominate the performance of PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate).
Years of work went into the process, Tappan said.
The idea is that by understanding the fundamental physical behavior of an explosive and the detonation process, researchers will improve predictive models of how explosives will behave under a variety of conditions.
Right now, "if we want to model the performance of an explosive, it requires parameters determined from experiments under a particular set of test conditions. If you change any of the conditions, those models we have for predictions don't hold up any more," said Rob Knepper of Sandia's Energetic Materials Dynamic and Reactive Sciences organization.
Physical vapor deposition works like this: Researchers put PETN powder in a crucible inside a vacuum chamber and heat it so the PETN evaporates. Above the crucible is a flat substrate of plastic, ceramic or metal, and the PETN vapor deposits on that, producing explosive films.
Such pristine samples allow the team to study the initiation and detonation behavior of explosives, Tappan said.
"By varying deposition conditions, we're starting to get a handle on how the deposition conditions affect the microstructure and how microstructure affects detonation behavior," Knepper added.
The tests use less explosive than what's inside a .22-caliber bullet, and researchers wearing safety glasses and ear protection can stand next to the experiment in a protective enclosure, Tappan said.
"A typical experiment weighs about a tenth of an aspirin tablet," he said. "If that tablet is 325 milligrams, we're shooting about 32.5 milligrams. These are not huge."
The team did multiple shots to determine at what point detonation fails.
"As size (thickness) decreases further and further, at some point the detonation will slow down and eventually fail," Tappan said.
Tappan, Knepper and co-authors Ryan R. Wixom, Jill C. Miller, Michael P. Marquez and J. Patrick Ball presented a paper at the 14th International Detonation Symposium in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, in 2010. In the paper, "Critical Thickness Measurements in Vapor-Deposited Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate Films," they wrote that the work represented the first highly resolved measurements of detonation failure in high-density PETN.
It adds new information for a very old explosive.
"What we brought to the table is a new experiment that allowed samples to be made that are small enough to measure this critical thickness property," Tappan said. "Other research been done on PETN in a different form or when it had a binder added to it. This is the first time these data have been done on the critical detonation geometry for pure, high-density PETN."
In the past, diameter information was obtained through experiments using high-aspect-ratio cylinders of pressed pellets of differing diameters. But it's difficult to press pellets with diameters smaller than 1 to 2 mm with precise density.
The work began under a three-year Laboratory Directed Research and Development grant that ended in 2001. It's now funded through a combination of internal and external programs.
Provided by Sandia National Laboratories