California to target Web retailers for sales taxes

September 3, 2012 by Marc Lifsher, Andrea Chang And Ricardo Lopez

The California tax man cometh, and he's headed for the Internet.

State tax collectors are preparing to crack down on renegade Internet merchants who don't collect , and nearly 100 new state auditors, lawyers and other specialists are being hired to help over the next three years.

The effort comes at a time when state and local governments are scrambling for money after cutting billions of dollars from budgets and trimming public services. The governor has asked voters in November to approve an increase in sales and income taxes. The new enforcement effort is expected to bring in an estimated $317 million in its first full year, and even more in subsequent years as online shopping grows.

Officials will be enforcing a controversial law passed last year that expands the kinds of online retailers that are required to collect California sales taxes on Internet purchases. Currently, those taxes range from 7.25 percent to 9.75 percent, depending on where residents live.

"This law is a giant step forward," said Jerome E. Horton, chairman of the state's tax collection agency, the Board of Equalization. "It will help California collect much needed revenue to support critical public services."

Enforcement also will help protect California's bricks-and-mortar stores - which already collect sales tax - from unfair competition, he said.

Some who like making tax-free purchases on the Internet are less pleased by the crackdown.

"I would like to be able to buy something cheaper by not paying taxes," said Ann Crill, 63, of Long Beach, Calif. "But then again, I can see the state's point of view that this is lost revenue."

The law that prompted the new enforcement effort was part of a compromise last year between the nation's largest online retailer, Inc., and state lawmakers. Under the agreement, Amazon agreed to open two distribution centers in California and start collecting sales taxes on sales in the state starting Sept. 15.

Major retailers such as Apple Inc., Staples Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. have been required to collect taxes on their online sales for years because they have stores and other operations in the state. But many others have exploited a decades-old loophole that exempted Internet and catalog sellers with no on-the-ground operations in the state.

Now the state is sending letters to more than 200 businesses, informing them that they may be required to start collecting sales taxes from California customers. The tax agency declined to release the list, saying such tax matters are confidential.

Many large online retailers, including, L.L. Bean and Blue Nile, do not currently collect sales taxes on California purchases. Overstock's president said his company was exempt from the new law and would not collect taxes; a spokesman for Blue Nile declined to comment. L.L. Bean did not return calls seeking comment.

The new tax law covers any out-of-state Internet retailer "that has a substantial nexus with California consumers," the tax agency said in a statement. That includes those that sold more than $1 million worth of goods to California shoppers in the last year and had more than $10,000 in sales referred to them by California-based affiliated websites.

Tax officials said figuring out which Internet sellers must collect the California sales tax won't be easy.

"We don't know how many will be affected, and how many won't," said Sean Wallentine, chief of staff to tax-agency board member George Runner. "It's a process the Board of Equalization will go through with each of those companies over time."

Getting that information will take more manpower. On Thursday, the tax agency announced new efforts that include spending $10 million over the next three fiscal years to hire nearly 100 tax specialists, auditors, lawyers and call-center operators. An additional 35 people will be needed in the fourth year, the board said recently.

These new workers are hired to identify and contact what the board estimates are "upwards of 2,000" out-of-state businesses that should be collecting sales tax under the new law and take action against any suspected scofflaws.

But going after large Internet retailers is "only the tip of the iceberg," Horton said. The Board of Equalization will also step up its efforts to educate consumers about their legal responsibility to remit their use taxes directly to the state on online purchases that aren't automatically taxed at the point of sale - something few Californians voluntarily do.

"There isn't enough personnel to collect that use tax that's outstanding; we'll never be able to do it," Horton said. "Our primary objective is to educate the consumer and hope that they start complying."

Tax law enforcement can be daunting. California and smaller states lack the auditing heft to fully enforce Internet sales tax laws, said Max Behlke, a policy specialist with the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"Bottom line is there's so much commerce going on, it's hard to pinpoint who's paying and who isn't paying," he said. "It would be nearly impossible to collect all the money that's owed."

Explore further: Amazon says tax delay will save jobs

Related Stories

Amazon says tax delay will save jobs

September 13, 2011

Amazon on Monday said legislation allowing online retailers to delay for one year the collection of sales tax in California would save jobs and provide time for a national law to be drawn up.

Amazon says gets OK for Calif sales tax referendum

July 19, 2011

(AP) -- Inc. says the California Attorney General's Office has approved its petition for a referendum that would let voters decide whether to overturn a new law that forces online retailers to collect sales taxes ...

Amazon cuts off California affiliates

June 30, 2011

(AP) -- Inc. and much smaller Inc. are cutting off their advertising affiliates in California because of a new state rule forcing online retailers to collect sales tax there.

Mall giant sues Indiana to tax sales

November 4, 2011

(AP) -- Shopping mall giant Simon Property Group sued the Indiana Department of Revenue on Thursday to try to force it to collect taxes from Inc. for all sales made in the state.

Amazon to cut off California-based Web affiliates

June 30, 2011

(AP) -- Inc. said Wednesday that it will stop working with online affiliates based in California since the state passed a new rule that forces online retailers to collect sales tax there.

Recommended for you

In colliding galaxies, a pipsqueak shines bright

February 20, 2019

In the nearby Whirlpool galaxy and its companion galaxy, M51b, two supermassive black holes heat up and devour surrounding material. These two monsters should be the most luminous X-ray sources in sight, but a new study using ...

Research reveals why the zebra got its stripes

February 20, 2019

Why do zebras have stripes? A study published in PLOS ONE today takes us another step closer to answering this puzzling question and to understanding how stripes actually work.

When does one of the central ideas in economics work?

February 20, 2019

The concept of equilibrium is one of the most central ideas in economics. It is one of the core assumptions in the vast majority of economic models, including models used by policymakers on issues ranging from monetary policy ...

Correlated nucleons may solve 35-year-old mystery

February 20, 2019

A careful re-analysis of data taken at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a possible link between correlated protons and neutrons in the nucleus and a 35-year-old mystery. ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 03, 2012
The alternative to collecting taxes is Greece.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 03, 2012
The alternative to collecting taxes is Greece.
More like Switzerland. All taxes paid by US citizens only pays INTEREST on the $16trillion borrowed from the FED aka Rothschilds. USA exists only on debt, like a junkie cashing out his credit card limit. With that they use half the money for wars.
not rated yet Sep 03, 2012
"renegade Internet merchants"
California has no jurisdiction on other states, other nations or other planets. Simply a pure power grab.

"Our primary objective is to educate the consumer and hope that they start complying."

Or maybe not keep so many illegal, illiterate Mexicans on welfare.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2012
$317 milion in first year..while at the same time spending over $6 billion trying to get americans to vote for another megalomaniac whose only interest is to make the obscenely rich..richer..hit the little man it's easier...
not rated yet Sep 04, 2012
There is no "loophole" that allows out-of-state internet companies not to charge state-sales tax but a 1992 SUPREME COURT DECISION (Quill v. North Dakota) that exempts any company not having a 'physical presence' in a state from the obligation to collect that state's taxes, which makes this tax exemption as much a "law of the land" as if it had been established by Congress. It is California that is attempting a loophole in the exemption by declaring that having $10,000 in sales from referrals from a California-based company is to have the last act as the out-of-state company's agent, and therefore to establish a foothold or physical presence in California. California is hedging that the Supreme Court will agree and not declare their new tax law in violation of interstate commerce power clause of the Constitution.
If California is in such dire need of tax revenue, as it seems it is, it should increase state income taxes on the multi-billion companies themselves.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.