European Arctic forests expansion could result in carbon dioxide release: study

Carbon stored in Arctic tundra could be released into the atmosphere by new trees growing in the warmer region, exacerbating climate change, scientists have revealed.

The Arctic is getting greener as increases in response to a warmer climate. This greater plant growth means more carbon is stored in the increasing biomass, so it was previously thought the greening would result in more carbon dioxide being taken up from the atmosphere, thus helping to reduce the rate of global warming.

However, research published in Nature Climate Change, shows that, by stimulating decomposition rates in soils, the expansion of forest into tundra in arctic Sweden could result in the release of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.

Dr Iain Hartley now based in Geography at the University of Exeter, and lead author of the paper, said: "Determining directly how carbon storage is changing in high-latitude ecosystems is very difficult because the majority of the carbon present is stored below ground in the soils. Our work indicates that greater plant biomass may not always translate into greater carbon storage at the ecosystem level.

"We need to better understand how the anticipated changes in the distribution of different plant communities in the Arctic affects the decomposition of the large carbon stocks in tundra soils if we are to be able to predict how arctic greening will affect carbon dioxide uptake or release in the future."

By measuring carbon stocks in vegetation and soils between tundra and neighbouring birch forest, it was shown that compared to tundra, the two-fold greater carbon storage in plant in the forest was more than outweighed by the smaller carbon stocks in .

Furthermore, using a novel methodology based on measuring the radiocarbon content of the carbon dioxide being released, the researchers found that the appeared to be stimulating the decomposition of soil organic matter. Thus, the research was able to identify a mechanism by which the birch trees can contribute directly to reducing carbon storage in soils.

"Dr Gareth Phoenix, of the University of Sheffield's Department Animal and Plant Sciences, who collaborated on the research, added:

"It shows that the encroachment of trees onto Arctic tundra caused by the warming may cause large release of carbon to the atmosphere, which would be bad for global warming.

"This is because tundra soil contains a lot of stored organic matter, due to slow decomposition, but the trees stimulate the decomposition of this material. So, where before we thought trees moving onto tundra would increase carbon storage it seems the opposite may be true. So, more bad news for climate change."

The results of the study are in sharp contrast to the predictions of models which expect total to increase with the greater plant growth. Rather, this research suggests that colonisation by productive, high-biomass, plant communities in the Arctic may not always result in greater capture of carbon dioxide, but instead net losses of carbon are possible if the of the large carbon stocks in Arctic soils are stimulated. This is important as Arctic soils currently store more carbon than is present in the atmosphere as and thus have considerable potential to affect rates of . It is yet to be seen whether this observed pattern is confined to certain soil conditions and colonising tree species, or whether the in the soils of other arctic or alpine ecosystems may be vulnerable to colonisation by new as the climate continues to warm.

Explore further

Largest recorded tundra fire yields scientific surprises

Journal information: Nature Climate Change

Citation: European Arctic forests expansion could result in carbon dioxide release: study (2012, June 17) retrieved 18 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 17, 2012
Day 1: Forests Good - Deforestation Bad

Day 2: Forest Bad - Deforestation Bad

Day 3: Forests Good - Deforestation Good

Day 4: Repeat until funding dries up

Jun 17, 2012
This study is informative. But trying to map its findings onto climate change or even global CO2 levels is a big stretch. Why? Concurrency does not imply causation. In this case a simple alternative is that the birch forest grows where the sequestered CO2 isn't. That wouldn't surprise me at all, since around my part of the woods (New Hampshire), birch trees favor acidic soil. Carbonates are used all over the place, including possibly your kitchen, as a buffer to keep things basic or at near neutral (7.0 pH).

Is it possible that the birch trees only move in after the decomposition of organic matter stops? Sure. That would have the same effect--but the reaction should be to find other types of trees to grow in those conditions. (I like maples, especially when tapped for syrup. ;-) Maples do handle acidic soils but prefer a near neutral pH (5.5 to 7.5).

The other trees that need to get tested are evergreens, especially nordic spruce.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more