The problem generally occurs because of the way we transfer our liquids such as gasoline. Rather than simply pour it, we prefer the convenience of a pump, hose and nozzle. This arrangement makes it easier to get the gas into our tank and to measure how much has been transferred. Unfortunately, it also leads to a tiny bit of leftover when the pump is turned off, which in most cases winds up as little drops of gasoline falling to the ground just before nestling the nozzle back into its holster. And that Canadian company Dram Innovations says, leads to some 500 million liters of gasoline dripped onto the ground and evaporated into the atmosphere worldwide every year.
To solve the problem, the company has developed a nozzle technology that can be used to prevent drips of any type, but that focuses most particularly on gasoline dripping. Theyre not saying of course, exactly how it works, but one part of it at least employs the use of a small screen similar to that used to disperse the flow of water from a faucet. They say their nozzle, which can be attached directly to the end of a hose to replace conventional nozzles, or added as an attachment could serve as both a convenience and a means of reducing pollution.
The convenience factor comes in as consumers would no longer have to worry about drops falling on their hands, shoes, pant legs, etc. The pollution factor comes in due to the fact that when gasoline falls to the ground, it reacts with the surrounding air and produces ozone, and we all know what that does.
The company hasnt yet found a buyer for their nozzle but hope to attract the attention of consumers and then hopefully big oil companies who they say would benefit too, as lost drops impact the bottom line of gas station owners as well.
Explore further:
Silent nozzle extinguisher does not harm hard disks
_ucci_oo
dschlink
Temple
Nope. Think about it. After the drops have gone through the meter, they're not going to go through it again. No double charging.
Indeed if those drops go into the gas tank of the next person instead of evaporating, then theoretically, that next person will require *slightly less* gas to pass through the meter before the tank is filled. The gas company will earn slightly less on them.
I'm not suggesting this factors at all into motives or what have you, but if 500 million litres of gasloline goes into gas tanks instead of on the ground, that's 500 million less litres that gas companies will sell.
Skepticus
thermodynamics
Bigbobswinden
A_Paradox
*At this US gov't web site:
[H teateapee : sl sl ga dot water dot usgs dot gov sl edu sl sc4 dot html]
"There is no scientific definition of the volume of a faucet drip, but after measuring a number of kitchen and bathroom sink faucets, for our calculations below (numbers are rounded), we are going to use 1/4 milliliter (ml) as the volume of a faucet drip [equates to 16 per drop]. So, by these drip estimates:
"One gallon: 15,140 drips
"One liter: 4,000 drips "
* A billion 1,000,000,000
* Number of billions in estimate 9
=9,000,000,000
* percentage getting petrol 50.00%
= 4,500,000,000
* number of drops each time 5
= 22,500,000,000
* number of drops per litre 4,000
= 5,625,000 Litres
9 billion is excessive for people, but petrol or diesel fuel goes into cars, motor bikes, trucks, tractors, small planes, boats, jerry cans ....
I must be missing something here? could somebody else please check these figures!!!
A_Paradox
A_Paradox
[and 'flood control' blew me a raspberry also :-[
Eikka
Mastoras
Myself, not only I tap the nozle untill all drops stop falling, but I'm lifting the hose above tank level while holding the nozle open, trying to catch whatever stays in the hose. I look for the smalest price, I unload the car from anything unnecessary, I drive with constant speed, I avoid acceleration. I should start using a bicycle for travels in the city.
-.
Mastoras
But..., but... It will bring investments --for one more unneeded product, though.
-.