Wasted milk is a real drain on our resources, study shows

May 13, 2012

Milk poured down Britain's kitchen sinks each year creates a carbon footprint equivalent to thousands of car exhaust emissions, research shows.

Scientists say the 360,000 tonnes of wasted in the UK each year creates equivalent to 100,000 tonnes of CO2. The study by the University of Edinburgh says this is the same as is emitted by about 20,000 cars annually.

The research identifies ways that could also help curb greenhouse gas emissions – by reducing the amount of food they buy, serve and waste. They also suggest the food industry could reduce emissions by seeking more efficient ways to use fertilisers.

Researchers also say halving the amount of chicken consumed in the UK and other developed countries to levels eaten in Japan could cut greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to taking 10 million cars off the road.

Figures show that if average chicken consumption in developed countries fell from the current level of 26kg each per year to the Japanese average of about 12kg each by 2020, global emissions from poultry would fall below current levels, despite increased output from the developing world. This would cut the predicted global output of nitrous oxide, a key greenhouse gas, from this source by almost 20 per cent, based on current growth rates.

Demand for food, particularly meat, is expected to increase over the next few decades as the world's population continues to grow and emerging countries consume more.

Agriculture is the biggest source of nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas that is emitted by soil and fertilisers. Producing meat produces more emissions than growing crops, as large amounts of cereals are grown to feed livestock.

Researchers arrived at their findings by examining data for global agricultural production of greenhouse gases together with consumption of food in various regions of the world. The study, carried out in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen and partners in Europe and the US, was published in Nature Climate Change.

Dr David Reay of the University of Edinburgh's School of GeoSciences, who led the study, said: "Eating less meat and wasting less food can play a big part in helping to keep a lid on emissions as the world's population increases."

Explore further: New way to measure nitrous oxide emissions

Related Stories

New way to measure nitrous oxide emissions

March 6, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- An accurate new way to measure a potent greenhouse gas emitted during agricultural production will help countries to better manage their environmental impact, thanks to Queensland University of Technology ...

Climate tax on meat and milk results in less greenhouse gases

January 25, 2011

A climate tax corresponding to $80/ton CO2eq on meat and milk could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture by around seven per cent. If the land made available is used for bioenergy production, the decrease ...

Biodiesel won't drive down global warming

April 23, 2007

EU legislation to promote the uptake of biodiesel will not make any difference to global warming, and could potentially result in greater emissions of greenhouse gases than from conventional petroleum derived diesel. This ...

Scientists study how climate change impacts food production

April 21, 2008

The old adage, “We are what we eat,’’ may be the latest recipe for success when it comes to curbing the perils of global climate warming. Despite the recent popular attention to the distance that food travels from ...

Recommended for you

Heavy oils and petroleum coke raising vanadium emissions

December 15, 2017

Human emissions of the potentially harmful trace metal vanadium into Earth's atmosphere have spiked sharply since the start of the 21st century due in large part to industry's growing use of heavy oils, tar sands, bitumen ...

Climate change made Harvey rainfall 15 percent more intense

December 14, 2017

A team of scientists from World Weather Attribution, including researchers from Rice University and other institutions in the United States and Europe, have found that human-caused climate change made the record rainfall ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) May 13, 2012
Milk? You can have it. I suppose I do waste a bit, since I only use it to cook and that, not often.
Chicken? Not a chance. This story seems to have a hidden undercurrent which I see leading to rationing of animal protein.
Who is going to do the rationing?
1.5 / 5 (2) May 13, 2012
One of first plastics was gallalith - a quite naturally behaving plastic manufactured of milk: biodegradable, antiallergenic, antistatic and virtually nonflammable.
1 / 5 (2) May 13, 2012
"Wasted milk is a real drain on our resources, study shows"
Get a life.
4 / 5 (5) May 13, 2012
Over the last decade I have lost 3 quarts of milk to bacteria.

The rest was consumed.

Why do I constantly achieve with ease what others can not do?

Am I that vastly superior to the rest of humanity?
2 / 5 (3) May 14, 2012
Who pours milk down the sink? We seem to use all of it at my place. 360,000 tons seems an awful lot but apparently, when you do the math, it comes out at 2.6% as 13.96 million tonnes of milk was produced in the UK in 2010. http://wattsupwit...otprint/
2.5 / 5 (2) May 14, 2012
On the contrary, if more people ate poultry instead of red meat, you'd save much more by reducing the amount of feed used for meat, the land used to grow them, water pollution etc. etc.
3 / 5 (2) May 14, 2012
Wow Eikka actually makes a good point for once.

Poultry and fish.
4 / 5 (1) May 14, 2012
Don't cry over it...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.