Shadow over Kyoto Protocol threatens UN climate talks

November 21, 2011 by Marlowe Hood and Anthony Lucas
Smoke belches from a coal-powered power plant on the outskirts of Linfen, in China's Shanxi province, December 2009. A new round of UN climate talks opens in South Africa next week against a backdrop of record greenhouse-gas emissions but deep frustration in the quest for a solution.

A new round of UN climate talks opens in South Africa next Monday, testing global resolve to tackle what scientists warn is a time bomb with an ever-shorter fuse.

Even as the latest research paints a future of climate-inflicted chaos and misery, the quest for a political solution remains elusive.

Analysts say the UN process is still traumatised by the near-collapse of the 2009 Copenhagen Summit and, in Durban, faces a bustup over the , the only agreement setting legal curbs on .

Brandished by its defenders as a model of climate cooperation between rich and poor, Kyoto's first roster of pledges expires at the end of 2012.

But the treaty has been gravely weakened by the absence of the and the lack of binding constraints over emerging giants such as China and India.

The stage is set for a "very complicated dance" determining whether Kyoto has a future, said Alden Meyer, a veteran from the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists.

"The worst-case scenario leads to gridlock and the collapse of the whole process," he said.

Canada, Japan and Russia have already refused to sign on for a second commitment period, objecting to the lack of legal constraints on the world's biggest carbon polluters.

Europe says it can accept a continuation, provided China and the United States show they are serious about major cuts in the coming years.

Dispatching Kyoto into limbo would be politically devastating.

Next June, world leaders gather for the 20th anniversary of the Rio Summit where the (UNFCCC) was born.

"Durban is the last real opportunity for countries to provide certainty on a future climate regime," says the green group WWF.

"The world's citizens are waiting for a clear signal about what countries will do in a second commitment period that will help save the planet and its people."

Other think otherwise

"Although the protocol remains an important emblem of multilateralism, it has become, in reality, more of an impediment than a means to genuine progress," Elliot Diringer of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a US thinktank, wrote in the journal Nature last week.

But such big-horizon rhetoric contrasts sharply with the low-key pragmatism that marks the climate process these days, a mood sharpened by financial crisis and austerity.

The new matrix is the Copenhagen Accord, which set down a target of limiting warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), formally adopted by the UN body at last year's talks in Cancun, Mexico.

But no deadline or tools have been set for achieving this goal beyond a voluntary roster of emission curbs.

"The pledges that are on the table right now, we reckon that maybe you get 60 percent of what needs to be done in order to stay below 2 C (3.6 F)," Artur Runge-Metzger, the EU's top negotiator, said in Brussels this month.

"If we move to a 4 C (7.2 F) world, the 2003 (European) summer, where we had this extraordinary heatwave in August, is an average summer in the 2040s and one of the cooler ones in the 2060s."

There were some 70,000 excess deaths across the continent that summer.

Deeply concerned by the widening "gigatonne gap," Europe wants Durban to set a roadmap towards a global pact by 2015, an idea shared by Australia, Norway and vulnerable small-island states.

But notions of where the roadmap would lead, and how long it might take to get there, vary.

Durban's low expectations are in part a rebound from Copenhagen, where a frantic scramble by 130 heads of state to forge a planet-wide climate deal degenerated into a welter of bitching and backbiting.

The 12-day Durban talks start at the level of senior officials and end with environment ministers. Presidents and prime ministers will be in short supply.

In addition to the haggle over carbon mitigation, the meeting is tasked with advancing a proposed Climate Green Fund, sketched in Copenhagen and launched in Cancun.

The goal is to ramp up provisions to at least 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to help poor countries fight climate change and adapt to worsening floods, droughts and storms. But talks on the Fund's design have hit a roadblock, with objections raised by the United States and Saudi Arabia.

The Fund remains "an empty shell," UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon complained last Monday in a speech in the Bangladesh capital of Dhaka.

Meanwhile, the news from science is relentlessly bad.

On November 4, the US Department of Energy reported that 2010 saw the biggest-ever increase in global warming emissions -- a nearly six-percent year-on-year rise from 8.6 billion tonnes to 9.1 billion tonnes, as countries turned to cheap and plentiful coal to meet energy needs.

"Science tells us that we are driving in a fog headed toward a cliff but are unsure just how far away it is," said US scientist Scott Mandia.

"Given this warning, it is quite foolish to be stepping on the accelerator."

Climate change: Factfile on the scientific evidence

Following is a snapshot of scientific evidence for global warming and its impacts ahead of the November 28-December 9 UN climate talks in Durban, South Africa.

Except where stated, the source is the Fourth Assessment Report published by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007.

-- Evidence of global warming is "unequivocal", with a more than 90-percent probability that humans are largely responsible. The main culprit is greenhouse gas from fossil fuels, which traps solar heat in the atmosphere, warming Earth's surface.

-- Levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have risen by around a third since pre-industrial times and are now at their highest in 650,000 years. They surged by 2.3 parts per million (ppm) between 2009 and 2010, according to the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). This was higher than the average for the 1990s (1.5 pppm) and in the past decade (2.0 ppm).

-- Between 1990 and 2010, there has been a 29 percent increase in "radiative forcing", meaning the warming effect on our climate system, the WMO said. CO2 in the atmosphere will linger for decades to come, adding to warming even if all emissions stopped tomorrow.

-- Since 1900, sea level has risen by 10-20 centimetres (four to eight inches). Global average surface temperature has risen by 0.8 degrees Celsius (1.44 degrees Fahrenheit). Average temperatures above land have risen far faster, by 0.91 C (1.64 F) since the mid-20th century, according to the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project.

-- Climate change is already visible in sea-level rise, loss of alpine glaciers and snow cover, shrinking Arctic summer sea ice, thawing permafrost and poleward migration of many animals and plants towards cooler habitats.

-- By 2100, "best estimates" for the rise in global average surface temperatures run from 2.4-4.0 C (4.3-7.8 F) depending on fossil-fuel use. These figures also mask big variations, according to region and country.

-- In 2007, the IPCC projected sea levels will rise by at least 18 cms (7.2 inches) by 2100. Since then, many studies point to the risk of meltoff from the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets. Most experts now say a one-metre (39-inch) increase is plausible.

-- 20-30 percent of plant and animal species are threatened with extinction if average global temperatures increase by 1.5-2.5 C (2.7-4.5 F) compared to the average temperature during the two last decades of the 20th century.

-- In Africa, by 2020, up to 75 to 250 million people will be exposed to increased water stress. Yields from rain-fed agriculture in some African countries could be reduced by up to 50 percent. Desert-like areas could expand by five to eight percent by 2080.

-- In Asia, available fresh water will decrease by mid-century. Coastal mega-deltas will be at risk from flooding due to rising seas. Mortality due to diseases associated with floods and droughts will increase.

-- Extreme weather events such as heatwaves, droughts and rainstorms are likely to become more frequent and/or intensive, according to an IPCC special report published on November 18.

-- Stabilising emissions at 445-535 ppm of CO2 equivalent would limit the overall rise in global warming since pre-industrial times to 2.0-2.8 C (3.6-5.0 F). Concentrations are currently 389 ppm. A level of 450 ppm corresponds roughly to the target of 2.0 C (3.6 F) embraced at the UN climate talks in Cancun in 2010.

-- Countries have to close a CO2 "gigatonne gap" to meet the 2.0 C (3.6 F) target. Researchers at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at ETH Zurich calculate emissions would have to fall by 8.5 percent by 2020 compared to 2010 and then continue to decline.

Explore further: 2015 climate 'roadmap' idea well received, says EU

Related Stories

2015 climate 'roadmap' idea well received, says EU

November 6, 2011

The European Union's top climate diplomat said on Saturday the bloc's proposal for upcoming UN talks to lay down a new "roadmap" leading to a comprehensive global deal by 2015 has been well received.

EU urges roadmap this year on climate action

October 3, 2011

The European Union urged all nations Sunday to make clear how they will tackle climate change, saying the world needs a roadmap this year on future action even if a treaty appears out of reach.

Climate talks inch ahead on aid despite discord

October 8, 2011

Climate negotiators said they made progress on laying out ways to help poor countries but deep differences remained on core issues ahead of a make-or-break talks in South Africa.

UN climate chief warns on Kyoto Protocol deadline

April 4, 2011

Commitments by most developed countries to cut carbon emissions are likely to expire at the end of next year without a new round of legally binding pledges, the UN's climate chief warned Monday.

Recommended for you

How the Elwha dam removals changed the river's mouth

January 19, 2018

For decades, resource managers agreed that removing the two dams on the Elwha River would be a big win for the watershed as a whole and, in particular, for its anadromous trout and salmon. The dams sat on the river for more ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (6) Nov 21, 2011
Dispatching Kyoto into limbo would be politically devastating.

We need to end the politics of social redistribution of resources. Lets dispatch Kyoto into limbo now.
3.7 / 5 (6) Nov 21, 2011
This group does not speak for the "world's citizens" and it certainly does not "represent" the developing world. It arrogantly assumes a great deal on its own assignments. The proper place for citizens to be represented is in their own freely elected governments.

The last time I checked, the UN was neither the government of this planet or elected by its citizens. It has proven itself to be a poor guardian of the developing world, exposing them to abuses of the powerful while insuring the rich nations can help themselves to their resources and labor. It also has a poor history of installing repressive regimes that maintain these economic and strategic exploitations.

It makes me cringe every time I hear UN "authorities" demand population controls on these vulnerable nations. Who would demand such an outrageous final solution but a conceited psychopath hypnotized by his own jingo?
1 / 5 (2) Nov 21, 2011
Rothschilds are behind this globally enforceable tax on respiration. Nuff said.
3 / 5 (2) Nov 21, 2011
Between 1990 and 2010, there has been a 29 percent increase in "radiative forcing", meaning the warming effect on our climate system, the WMO said. CO2 in the atmosphere will linger for decades to come, adding to warming even if all emissions stopped tomorrow.

I feel sorry for you moronic right wing deniers. It is so sad to see idiots walking and talking amongst themselves with earplugs placed so firmly and deep as to not here their own voice of reason!

Nuff said.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.