Research calls for a major shake-up of carbon markets

November 15, 2011

Research from the University of East Anglia and University of Sussex calls for a major shake-up of carbon markets

A panel of experts will meet ahead of the Durban to discuss a new report from the University of East Anglia and University of Sussex which calls for an overhaul of how markets in are governed.

Environmental, economic and development experts will debate whether the commitment to carbon markets is the right approach to tackle climate change at the public event 'Carbon Markets for the Poor – A Contradiction in Terms?' on November 15 at UEA London.

The event will launch a new research briefing paper which calls for a major shake-up of the way the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is governed - to promote transparency and accountability, create channels for greater public input, and ultimately ensure the benefits of sustainable development are passed to poor communities.

The paper, entitled 'Governing Clean Development: what have we learnt?' is the third in a series published as part of the Governance of Clean Development project at UEA.

The three-year Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded research programme was set up to explore the politics and governance of clean development in the energy sector.

It investigates which actors, institutions and policy-making processes involved in clean development are resulting in effective climate action and development benefits, which are not, and why.

The findings show why the CDM falls short on its promise to provide sustainable development benefits in developing countries.

The paper has been authored by Prof Peter Newell, from the University of Sussex (formerly of UEA) and Jon Phillips, from UEA's School of International Development.

Key findings:

  • Stronger and more effective institutions from local to international level are required to steer the CDM toward climate and development goals.
  • Local communities and the public have few opportunities to directly engage with CDM procedures and little political influence over CDM policy. Improved access to information is important but it does not do away with the need for representation of stakeholders.
  • The CDM's potential to reach citizens bypassed by other forms of finance can be enhanced by aligning the mechanism with national policies and coordinated donor initiatives.
  • Crucially, the political barriers to the uptake of clean technologies run deeper than carbon markets and the scope of technocratic reform programmes that have been proposed to date. Wider political changes are required in the way institutions function and politics are conducted to reward the winners from a low carbon energy economy as well as address the potential losers.
Prof Newell said: "Our research shows that important aspects of the politics and governance of clean development are performing badly, resulting in poor outcomes for both the climate and for development. Reform is vital if the CDM is to credibly position itself as a 'win-win' mechanism for climate change mitigation and sustainable development.

"These twin goals of the CDM are undermined by poor governance and the political realities of overcoming vested interests in the energy sector. We have found a strong link between who takes the decisions and who benefits. There is a real danger that the CDM could become a 'rich man's club' of project developers, emissions verifiers and government officials, in roles that overlap and lack transparency."

Jon Phillips added: "The potential of the CDM lies in reaching sectors, regions and people that are unlikely to benefit from other forms of carbon finance. Better public engagement coordinated planning and accessibility for poor communities is needed to ensure the mechanism benefits the majority of people."

The paper will be launched and discussed at the event by leading actors and specialists in the field, including Prof Newell, who will speak about the project's findings and open a public debate on the role of carbon markets in climate policy.

The panel will be made up of leading carbon market specialists – including Adrian Rimmer, chief executive of the Gold Standard Foundation - a certification body which aims to improve the pro-poor outcomes of CDM projects, Cambridge University's Prof Michael Grubb, who is also editor in chief of the journal Climate Policy, Craig Bennett, director of Policy and Campaigns at Friends of the Earth and Dr Emily Boyd, Reader in Environmental Change and Human Communities at the University of Reading.

The UK government's Martin Hession, chair of the CDM Executive Board, will provide reflections on key messages at the end of the debate and Simon Maxwell, a Senior Research Associate at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) in London and chair of the and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN), will chair the panel.

Explore further: Kyoto treaty is ‘failing the world’s poor’, say scientists

Related Stories

UN board could rein in $2.7 billion carbon market

August 21, 2010

(AP) -- An obscure U.N. board that oversees a $2.7 billion market intended to cut heat-trapping gases has agreed to take steps that could lead to it eventually reining in what European and U.S. environmentalists are calling ...

Carbon measuring system to help mitigate climate change

May 18, 2009

The $9.16m Carbon Benefits Project, which involves the Overseas Development Group at the University of East Anglia (UEA), hopes to encourage sustainable development schemes in developing countries that generate climate adaptation, ...

Report underscores advantages of renewable energy future

May 10, 2011

A major new report by the United Nations-supported Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) launched today underscores the incredible environmental and social advantages of a future powered by renewable energy over ...

EU to ban China, India carbon credits trade

January 21, 2011

Europe is to ban a highly lucrative trade in polluting rights obtained by European-based companies under a UN scheme to favour environmentally-friendly industrial investment in the likes of China or India.

World survey suggests major technology changes

August 24, 2011

A new global survey by the United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) suggests that a technological overhaul of production processes worldwide is needed to end poverty and avert the likely impacts ...

Recommended for you

Scientists dispute missing dryland forests

November 21, 2017

Scientists are disputing the possibility that a significant portion of the world's forests have been missed in an earlier accounting of ecological diversity.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (10) Nov 16, 2011
I'ts a strange world when con tricks can be openly advertised in the media.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 16, 2011
For planet Earth to avoid a slow spiral to a catastrophic heat death; action must be taken by all of the people that occupy it. Actions by governments that represent the people's concerns will impact climate change far more than consumer effects on industry.

Governance of global CO2 emissions in a common market will at least bring CO2 to a steady state. Capped. Once CO2 is capped, good things can happen with the economy.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.