France must improve nuke plants 'without delay'

A picture taken last week of work on a new nuclear power plant at Flamanville, France
France must immediately improve safety at its nuclear power plants so they can deal with natural disasters in the wake of Japan's Fukushima accident, an industry body said Thursday. However, the IRSN said a next generation power station being built at Flamanville in the northwest (pictured) is "better protected"

France must immediately improve safety at its nuclear power plants so they can deal with natural disasters in the wake of Japan's Fukushima accident, an industry body said Thursday.

"The accident and extra safety tests show the need to improve without delay some of the facilities' security parameters," the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) said in a 500-page report.

In the wake of the earthquake and tsunami that sparked a disaster at Japan's Fukushima plant in March, France, proportionally the world's biggest user of nuclear power, conducted tests on its own .

Inspectors assessed the power plants' ability to resist such as earthquakes and floods.

"It turns out that there are a certain number of non-conformities concerning nuclear safety frames of reference," IRSN chief Jacques Repussard told journalists.

The IRSN cited as an example inadequate emergency water reserves for cooling mechanisms or certain sections of piping that would not withstand an earthquake.

A picture from March of the Gravelines nuclear power plant in Gravelines, northern France
Nuclear power stations at Gravelines (pictured), Saint Alban and Tricastin must "take into account dangerous phenomena" as they are near industrial installations such as chemical factories or routes where explosives are transported, France's nuclear watchdog says.
"These are little faults that could have serious consequences," Repussard said, nevertheless stressing there are "no dangerous nuclear sites in France".

"Installations authorised to be used in France can legitimately be considered as safe," the report said.

The IRSN said a next generation power station being built at Flamanville in the northwest was "better protected" against shocks such as an earthquake or flooding as its design "benefits from extra measures."

But power stations at Gravelines, Saint Alban and Tricastin must "take into account dangerous phenomena" as they are near industrial installations such as or routes where explosives are transported, the IRSN said.


Explore further

Radioactive iodine: Now France detects traces in atmosphere

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: France must improve nuke plants 'without delay' (2011, November 17) retrieved 23 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-11-france-nuke.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 18, 2011
It's good to see a more moderate stance taken by France (vs. Germany, etc.) on this issue. Learn from the lessons of others, make upgrades, improve conditions, safety, and technology. Do not take the express elevator to radical land and decide to wipe out with one irrational decision one of the best, most efficient and cleanest energy sources ever created.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more