AMD struggles to reinvent itself

November 23, 2011 By Steve Johnson
AMD logo

Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Advanced Micro Devices was hoping to profit from a bigger share of the PC chip market after its longtime nemesis, Intel, suffered a string of antitrust regulatory rebukes in recent years.

But it hasn't quite worked out that way. Intel has extended its lead in the business while AMD has struggled to stay out of the red, ousted its CEO and recently announced it is gutting its workforce.

Now AMD, a fixture for more than four decades, is considering a new strategy that some experts believe could dramatically alter its protracted struggle with the Santa Clara, Calif.-based Goliath, one of the most closely watched and acrimonious brawls in the tech industry.

"We're at an inflection point," said company spokesman Mike Silverman. "We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mind-set, because it won't be about that anymore."

Although AMD has been vague about its plans, the company is widely expected to push hard to get its chips into smartphones and tablets. Those markets not only are dominated by other companies, but its gargantuan archrival is trying to elbow its way into them, too - potentially moving the war with Intel onto a new battleground.

Nonetheless, AMD has to change to keep up with the fickle tastes of consumers, according to Mercury Dean McCarron.

"The competitive dynamic has shifted because of these new markets opening," he said. "There's kind of a big restructuring of the world taking place and all of the companies are working to address it."

AMD, which was founded in 1969, and Intel, launched one year earlier, began feuding over patents and other matters in the early 1980s. That's when IBM chose to equip its personal computers with Intel's brainy x86 microprocessors and picked AMD as a backup supplier of those chips.

But the squabbling hit a new decibel level after AMD developed its own x86 design and accused Intel of employing intimidation and other unfair tactics to discourage their use by computer makers.

After AMD filed a broad antitrust suit against Intel in 2005, similar allegations were leveled in the next few years by Japan, Korea, New York state, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Europe, with the latter fining Intel $1.45 billion.

The chip giant has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and is appealing the European penalty. But in 2009, Intel agreed to give AMD $1.25 billion to resolve its complaints, and in 2010 it settled the FTC's suit by promising to change some of its practices. New York's suit is still pending.

AMD executives had hoped the legal actions would help them grab a bigger piece of the PC microprocessor business. But the opposite has happened. In 2006, AMD owned 23 percent of the market, while Intel controlled 75 percent, according to research firm IDC. Since then, AMD's share has slid to around 19 percent, while Intel's has grown to 80 percent.

Heavily in debt from its $5.6 billion purchase of a graphics chip chipmaker, AMD in 2009 sought to cut its expenses by spinning off its manufacturing operation into a joint venture called GlobalFoundries. But by then it had suffered a long string of financial losses, which didn't sit well on Wall Street.

"How many quarters are investors supposed to tolerate before we get action necessary to deliver some semblance of break-even or profitability?" groused American Technology Research analysts two years ago.

Since then, AMD has turned in better earnings and won praise for its chips' quality. Nonetheless, it's been chided for trailing Intel's technology and for being heavily dependent upon the PC business, where the pace of growth has slowed.

AMD's failure to get its chips into smartphones and tablets reportedly was behind its board's decision in January this year to oust CEO Dirk Meyer, who had been in the job since 2008, and to replace him in August with Rory Read, former CEO of PC and tablet maker Lenovo.

Meanwhile, AMD's woes have continued. In September it cut its revenue and profit forecast after having fewer of its top chips to sell because of manufacturing glitches at a German GlobalFoundries plant. And earlier this month, AMD announced it was laying off 1,400 employees - nearly 12 percent of its workforce.

By contrast, Intel's business has been booming. Reporting sales of nearly $44 billion last year, compared with about $6.5 billion for AMD, Intel has turned in a succession of record earnings.

Some analysts believe AMD may fire back at Intel by adopting a chip design long anathema to both companies. The design, licensed to various chipmakers by British firm ARM, currently dominates smartphones and tablets.

AMD might make chips based on both the x86 and ARM designs, some experts have speculated. But if it switches exclusively to ARM, it would leave Intel essentially alone in the x86 business, which "would make Intel kind of look like they are the guy that missed the meeting," said tech analyst Rob Enderle.

All AMD has said so far about its new strategy - which it has promised to detail in February - is that it intends to pursue "growth opportunities" in low-powered devices, emerging markets and Internet-based businesses.

Whatever path it takes, it had better be different from the one it's been on, said Creative Strategies tech analyst Tim Bajarin, because the microprocessor market "has really changed in this post-PC age."


-Founded: 1969

-Headquarters: Sunnyvale, Calif.

-Business: makes microchips, primarily for personal computers

-Employees: about 12,000 worldwide, but it is laying off 1,400.

-2010 sales: $6.49 billion

-2010 profit: $471 million

Explore further: AMD cutting 1,400 workers in first move by new CEO


Related Stories

AMD cutting 1,400 workers in first move by new CEO

November 3, 2011

(AP) -- Advanced Micro Devices Inc. is cutting some 1,400 workers as a weak computer market and manufacturing delays have hurt the world's second-biggest maker of microprocessors for PCs.

AMD names new CEO from Lenovo

August 25, 2011

(AP) -- Chipmaker AMD says its new chief executive will be Rory P. Read, the chief operating officer of Lenovo Group.

Sales of new chip lift AMD to 2Q profit

July 21, 2011

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. has been punished so hard for unexpectedly ousting its CEO more than 6 months ago that the second-quarter profit it posted Thursday gave investors a measure of confidence about its direction.

Intel settles AMD claims but isn't off the hook

November 12, 2009

(AP) -- Intel Corp. is paying Silicon Valley rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. $1.25 billion to squash a legal battle over Intel's sales tactics, a rift that led to antitrust charges against Intel in several countries and ...

AMD nearly doubles profit, but still seeking CEO

April 21, 2011

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. on Thursday reported that its net income nearly doubled in the first quarter as the computer industry benefits from strong corporate demand. But the company is still without a permanent CEO after ...

Recommended for you

New technique spots warning signs of extreme events

September 22, 2017

Many extreme events—from a rogue wave that rises up from calm waters, to an instability inside a gas turbine, to the sudden extinction of a previously hardy wildlife species—seem to occur without warning. It's often impossible ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.2 / 5 (5) Nov 23, 2011
IC technology would probably be a full process node ahead if Intel didn't have to pay those ridiculous fines. $2.6 billion buys a lot of engineers. Never mind progress though, we have to have a "fair" market where corporations are punished for succeeding.

5 / 5 (5) Nov 23, 2011
Intel wasn't punished for succeeding. It was punished for leveling threats against its customers. At the time that this all happened AMD couldn't single-handedly supply a large computer manufacturer like Dell. Intel knew this, and threatened to stop chip shipments to any manufacturer that used AMD products. So companies like Dell (which wanted to use AMD products back then) were left with the option of either using Intel chips exclusively, or being blacklisted by Intel (causing their eventual bankruptcy).

Yeah, Intel is *totally* a progress minded company:P.

Oh, and those fines and settlements didn't even dent Intel's profit margin. If it wanted to, it could spend billions more per year on R&D and still manage to give out a *huge* dividend.
5 / 5 (1) Nov 23, 2011
Fair market practices don't include kickbacks and coercive threats. Intel has had a difficult time learning that lesson.

As to AMD is is now reasonably clear that manufacturers are no longer beholden to one instruction set, and it is the very old and very poor x86 instruction set that Intel and AMD are married to.

AMD should consider opening up the internal registers in their CPUs and include a alternate new clean instruction set and instruction set decoder in their CPU's. Doing so would allow them to reduce the depth of the CPU pipeline and give software more registers to play with and as a result improve application speed and efficiency.

Such an instruction set and register set should be implemented as a new operating mode that can run along side the existing x86 instrtuction set, so that compatibility can be maintained while the x86 code is depreciated and discontinued.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.