More U.S. consumers spurn cable TV bills

October 10, 2011 By Mike Snider

In July, the Benediktssons of Chandler, Ariz., declared their independence from cable television.

After watching their monthly bill steadily increase to $90, the family dropped their subscription. But they didn't totally cut the cord.

Instead, they kept their Internet service from and use it to connect to Netflix for movies and TV shows such as "Grey's Anatomy." "We decided to start trimming where we could, and the cable bill was low-hanging fruit," says Baldur Benediktsson, 44, a website content manager.

He and wife, Kristin, also use a Roku set-top box to stream programs to their living room TV. A pair of rabbit-ear antennas receive local over-the-air digital TV signals displayed on 23-inch and 27-inch computer monitors that double as HDTVs.

Cable TV, he says, "gave us too much service for too much money, and we really didn't need it at all."

Lots of other viewers out there feel the same way. Nearly every pay-TV provider is leaking subscribers.

The nation's largest cable company, Comcast, lost 238,000 TV subscribers in the second quarter of this year; and No. 2 lost 130,000. lost 135,000 subscribers. Its larger competitor, DirecTV, added 26,000, but that's down from the 100,000 it added in the second quarter last year.

Obviously, one of the primary drivers of cord cutting is the nation's . The is stuck at 9.1 percent, and U.S. economic growth slowed to 1 percent in the most recent quarter. "People that are unemployed or underemployed ... have to cut their expenses," says Norm Bogen, analyst at market research firm In-Stat, "and one of the things they can cut is their pay TV."

But there's also tumultuous change going on in the TV business. The number of U.S. homes with traditional TVs has dropped slightly, from 115.9 million to 114.7 million, says Nielsen Media Research. Yet, total is on the rise, because more viewers are watching Internet-delivered video on a PC, tablet computer or smartphone, Nielsen says.

As Internet video options evolve, an increasing number of pay-TV customers are dropping their service or sliding to a lower tier of service - and using the Web to get their entertainment content. Some, like the Benediktssons, are adding antennas to watch local channels live via free, over-the-air digital TV signals. "The lock over the consumer that the cable companies once enjoyed ... has been blown to pieces," says Michael Greeson of market strategy firm The Diffusion Group.

For years, consumer advocates have argued for la carte programming options for consumers on the theory that paying for only the cable channels you wanted - instead of a package of a hundred-plus channels - would be cheaper. Cable companies never budged.

Now, consumers have the technology to cobble together their own programming packages. But it's not all in one place.

"If you drop pay TV, you've got a couple places to go to get what you want," Bogen says.

For instance, a home with broadband connectivity can get current TV episodes from major networks on websites such as, while older episodes are available at video destinations such as's On Demand video service. Many newer smart TVs let viewers bypass the computer with built-in apps for Netflix, Hulu and Vudu, a Walmart-owned video-rental website, which has new movie releases such as "Rio," along with classics from the Criterion Collection, and TV series "The Walking Dead" and "Weeds."

Video game systems have emerged as programming hubs, too. Sony's PlayStation 3 and Microsoft's Xbox 360 can be used to access Hulu and Netflix; the PS3 also gets Vudu, while the Xbox 360 has ESPN on Xbox Live. Even Nintendo's Wii streams Netflix, which has more than 25 million subscribers.

With three game systems, a Roku and an iPad, "we can pretty much watch our shows in any room in the house," says Derek Doss of McDonough, Ga. "What we have been missing on shows that aren't covered by Hulu and Netflix, we just hook up the laptop to the TV - and watch (on) the network's Internet site."

McDonough and others are impressed with digital TV reception. "We seem to have no problem receiving all of our local channels," says Katie Syroney of Cincinnati. She and husband Jeff truly cut the cord on their $100 monthly Time Warner Cable bill by switching to Clear, a wireless 4G Net service that costs $35 per month. They use it to connect their Roku to Amazon, Netflix, Hulu and Pandora's music service.

Even though some consumers are cutting, or at least shaving down, the cord, that's not necessarily all bad news for cable companies. Comcast, for instance, added 144,000 broadband customers and, as remaining video customers spend nearly $140 per month, saw video revenue increase 10 percent.

Pay-TV companies are adapting to the new digital world order in other ways, too. Last month, Time Warner Cable began giving rebates to customers for the full price of a $300 Slingbox, a set-top box that lets them access home TV programming on any Net-connected computer. The offer is only available to the company's best broadband customers who pay at least $99 monthly.

In May, Comcast added on-demand movies to its free Xfinity app for iPhones and iPads; the standard app, also available for Android devices, lets subscribers watch live TV shows and movies. Similarly, Time Warner Cable and Verizon FiOS TV subscribers can access ESPN on portable devices, too.

By constantly upgrading its features, Comcast aims to "make you more satisfied with the service," says Comcast's Jennifer Khoury. "And if you are satisfied with the service, why would you go to another provider?"

Other new free features recently out include Cox TV Online, which delivers live content to computers, and HBO Go for watching shows such as "A Game of Thrones" and "True Blood" on iPads, iPhones and Android phones, as well as computers.

DirecTV is developing an app for moving programming stored on DVRs onto the iPad (available in some markets by year's end) and another for streaming live content to the iPad.

And as the fall TV season gets going, the online TV landscape is shifting. Fox recently began delaying availability of episodes of its new shows on Hulu by eight days for anyone who isn't a pay-TV subscriber. That means hit series such as "House" and "Bones" won't be available immediately.

"What these 'TV Everywhere' services actually do is reinforce the tethering to some type of subscription," says PricewaterhouseCoopers consultant Howard Homonoff.

Meanwhile, Netflix has increased the prices for its DVD rental and streaming plans. Originally, unlimited DVDs (one checked out at a time) and streaming cost $9.99; each now separately costs $7.99 monthly, or about $16 for both. And Showtime will quit allowing streaming of first-run episodes next year; Starz recently began holding those back for 90 days.

Pay TV is not going away. In fact, total spending on TV subscriptions, PricewaterhouseCoopers projects, will increase from about $75 billion in 2010 to $99 billion in 2015. Cable homes will drop slightly, and homes with Internet TV services such as Verizon FiOS and AT&T's U-verse are expected to grow, the firm estimates.

Customers may be cutting the cable, "but they are not getting rid of the TV experience," says Jeff Weber, vice president of video product and strategy at AT&T, which added 400,000 U-verse subscribers in the first six months of 2011. "They want even more content and more control in what they watch."

To that end, U-verse has added a multi-view feature that lets viewers watch four channels of their choice simultaneously, and the U-verse Mobile feature that lets customers watch programs on portable devices. Says Weber, "It's almost the opposite of cord cutting."

Also expected to rise is spending on Netflix and other for-fee Internet content - from about $244 million to $1.1 billion in 2015, PwC estimates.

About 13 percent of adult broadband users who subscribe to a pay-TV service expect to cancel in the next six months - but only 1.5 percent say they definitely will, says the Diffusion Group's Greeson, citing research that the firm has yet to make public.

Least likely to cancel? Diehard sports fans and lovers of premium channels such as HBO and Showtime, who want to watch first-run episodes of "True Blood" or "Dexter" before friends and co-workers divulge plot twists. Nearly 70 percent of broadband homes put themselves in that category, says Bogen, so for now, "they are not likely to cut their service."

But as many as 29 percent might cut back on their service in the next six months, Greeson estimates. Eventually, the shifting TV landscape will produce a Net-based programmer that competes with current pay-TV services. "When that happens," Greeson says, "maybe we will start to see more people want to so-called cut the cord."

Explore further: Time Warner Cable launches iPad app with live TV (Update)

Related Stories

Annoyed consumers have alternatives to Netflix

September 28, 2011

If you're ticked off at Netflix because of its recent price increases and service changes, the good news is you've got plenty of options for streaming video. The bad news is that none offers exactly what you get from Netflix.

Netflix and beyond: new ways to watch TV, movies

September 19, 2011

(AP) -- The DVD-by-mail service Netflix built its business on will soon be known as Qwickster. The rebranding follows Netflix's decision to split its DVD rental business from its online streaming service, a move that raised ...

Recommended for you

Researchers find tweeting in cities lower than expected

February 20, 2018

Studying data from Twitter, University of Illinois researchers found that less people tweet per capita from larger cities than in smaller ones, indicating an unexpected trend that has implications in understanding urban pace ...

Augmented reality takes 3-D printing to next level

February 20, 2018

Cornell researchers are taking 3-D printing and 3-D modeling to a new level by using augmented reality (AR) to allow designers to design in physical space while a robotic arm rapidly prints the work.

What do you get when you cross an airplane with a submarine?

February 15, 2018

Researchers from North Carolina State University have developed the first unmanned, fixed-wing aircraft that is capable of traveling both through the air and under the water – transitioning repeatedly between sky and sea. ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2011
Whoever wrote this must be stupid. Cable companies have already begun rate increases for broadband due to increased bandwidth usage for video. You will pay, and probably more, since business has this knack of sucking your (and mine) money so they can 'grow' to charge you even more.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2011
Eschew d'mass' media lest one would join them.
5 / 5 (2) Oct 10, 2011
About 90 percent of cable television programming is either propaganda or some other form of utter crap that isn't worth watching anyway.

Besides sports, there are only a few good entertainment programs on television once in a while, and then maybe 2 or 3 "learning" channels, but they tend to do a lot of re-runs, and lately it's crap like "property virgins" and "super nanny".

Yay. I want to watch a nanny make some bad parents not quite as bad, and watch a real estate agent sell a house to somebody about 300 percent markup.

For the news, we have a choice between being brainwashed by the right, or being brainwashed by the left, or not watching at all.

Those guys on "Ancient Aliens" are probably all nut jobs, but at least they actually take you to all these ancient archeological sites and show what people were capable of in the past, and play around with ideas of what might have happened...
1 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2011
I pay for cable internet but not cable television... I have also cancelled my hulu plus subscription recently and will be cancelling netflix next week. I can get all of the television shows and movies I want on the internet, often before they would be aired on cable, and stream them to my TV via my PS3. If I wanted to I could buy a new terabyte hard drive every 3 months from the savings from cutting hulu/netflix to support my move to PC based media. In a year from now I'll have ~4tb of storage in a NAS full of my favorite shows and movies because I cancelled netflix and hulu... otherwise I would have had nothing to show for the money. Whenever possible I prefer my money to go to something permanent which I will own indefinitely rather than to a service where it disappears with nothing but its memory remaining.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 14, 2011
You will pay, and probably more, since business has this knack of sucking your (and mine) money so they can 'grow' to charge you even more.

Right. Because, we should be expecting them to lease extra fiber lines and hand out the added bandwidth for free. smh

I work for an ISP/TV provider you've never heard of. We compete with Comcast/CenturyLink/etc. EVERY ISP is furiously trying to add bandwidth to keep up with demand. The end is nowhere near in sight. Sorry, but if people are going to expect high quality 3D TV in the near future, EVERYONE's rates are going to keep rising. Blame bandwidth abusers, not the ISPs.

Why do people feel so entitled to virtually free media? (that's the tone I read in your comment)

(If anyone wants to give me a 1, I understand, it's cool; just comment, so I can know where you think I have it wrong. Thank you.)
3 / 5 (2) Oct 14, 2011
No you're absolutely right and I see it all the time here, an unfounded sense of entitlement. No one should be able to profit from their efforts, that's evil /rolleyes

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.