Design optimization could help maximize the power conversion efficiency of thin-film silicon solar cells

Better solar cells around the corner
A scanning electron microscopy image of silicon nanopillars on a surface-textured thin film for low-cost solar cells Credit: Agency for Science, Technology and Research

Silicon is readily available, easy to process, highly stable and non-toxic. It is also one of the best materials for making solar cells. The high quality and purity of silicon needed for fabricating the most efficient silicon-based solar cells, however, has made it difficult to lower production costs for this renewable energy technology. One approach that could reduce costs is to use a microscopically thin film of silicon with a textured surface to enhance light absorption. Navab Singh at the A*STAR Institute of Microelectronics and co-workers have now highlighted several key factors affecting the power conversion efficiency of surface-textured thin-film solar cells and come up with a ‘nanopillar’ design that maximizes light absorption and minimizes production costs.

The best performing thin-film silicon solar cells at present have efficiencies that are about half that of conventional bulk silicon solar cells. “By investigating a variety of appropriate vertical nanopillar designs we can enhance the light-trapping and -collection efficiency of thin films to compensate for the efficiency loss caused by reduced material quality and quantity,” says Singh.

The researchers investigated various factors that might affect the performance of a thin-film solar cell. These factors include the diameter and length of the nanopillar, as well as the spacing between nanopillars (see image). Similarly important is the design of the positively and negatively charged layers in the solar cells that are needed to separate the electrical carriers created by the absorbed light.

The researchers’ simulations showed that the thickness of the negatively charged layer on the outer side of the pillars should be as thin as possible in order to reduce ‘parasitic’ absorption—the annihilation of light-generated carriers before they cross the junction between layers where they would contribute to electrical power generation. They also found that an axial junction design in which the junction between positive and negative layers is confined to the very top of the pillars leads to a higher open-circuit voltage compared with more conventional radial junction structures in which the negative layer wraps around the entire pillars. Yet they found the converse to be true for the open-circuit current.

Singh and his co-workers therefore show that a balance of these factors is needed in order to optimize designs for light-to-power in surface-textured thin-film structures, which could eventually lead to thin-film silicon solar cells that are able to match the efficiency of the more expensive single-crystalline .


Explore further

Sharp Develops Mass-Production Technology for Triple-Junction Thin-Film Solar Cells

More information: Wong, S. M. et al. Nanopillar array surface-textured thin-film solar cell with radial p-n junction. IEEE Electron Device Letters 32, 176–178 (2011). ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeab … jsp?arnumber=5671473
Provided by Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
Citation: Design optimization could help maximize the power conversion efficiency of thin-film silicon solar cells (2011, September 5) retrieved 24 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-09-optimization-maximize-power-conversion-efficiency.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 05, 2011
So what's the conversion efficiency?

Sep 05, 2011
No need for that. We are innovating.

:)

Sep 06, 2011
I wonder how the cell performance would be effected by placing a graphene sheet on the top of the "pillars"?

Oct 06, 2011
I saw the "open-circuit current" in the last sentence of the fourth paragraph. Is it correct? I think it should be "short-circuit current".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more