Montana questions Exxon's estimate of oil spilled

July 12, 2011 By MATTHEW BROWN , Associated Press
An oil spill worker steps through oil contaminated waters along a flood plain of the Yellowstone River, Monday, July 11, 2011, near Laurel, Mont. Because of the high river levels, cleanup and testing efforts of a 42,000 gallon oil spill into the river on July 1 have been difficult. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

(AP) -- Montana environmental regulators have asked Exxon Mobil to justify its estimate for how much oil spilled into the Yellowstone River, citing the company's changing timeline on how long it took to stop a leaking pipeline.

The Texas-based company estimates between 31,500 and 42,000 gallons of crude flowed into the Yellowstone near Laurel on July 1, fouling the shoreline and backwaters along dozens of miles of the scenic river.

Exxon Mobil president Gary Pruessing initially said it took six minutes to shut down the pumps, but information submitted by the company to federal regulators later revealed it took almost an hour to fully stop the flow.

In a letter to Exxon Mobil executives, Montana Department of Environmental Quality Director Richard Opper asked for an explanation of why the spill volume was not changed given the longer timeline.

"Since the event occurred, has increased its estimate of the duration of the spill event 10-fold from its original assertion," Opper wrote. "Despite this revision as to the duration of the event, ExxonMobil has not revised its estimate as to the volume of the spill into the river."

Exxon Mobil representatives said last week the spill estimate was based on the correct timeline. Spokeswoman Cynthis Bergman said Tuesday the company believes its prior estimate was correct.

The estimate included oil lost after the pumps were shut down but before a series of valves were closed to fully seal off the section of failed pipeline, she said.

Opper also requested information from the company concerning the pipeline's pressure and flow rate beginning 48 hours before the through Monday. was asked to provide an answer by next Monday.

Because much of the oil was swept away by the river, only 1 to 5 percent of the is expected to be recovered.

Explore further: Oil spilled into Yellowstone River in US

0 shares

Related Stories

Oil spilled into Yellowstone River in US

July 3, 2011

An oil pipeline in northwestern US state Montana has ruptured and spilled crude oil into the Yellowstone River, a key tourist attraction in the region that runs through a famed national park, the pipeline operator acknowledged ...

Montana, Exxon Mobil split over river oil spill

July 9, 2011

(AP) -- Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer has decided Exxon Mobil and the state don't make good roommates after nearly a week of working together in close quarters to clean up an estimated 42,000 gallons of crude oil released ...

Feds warned company in Mich. spill about pipeline

August 1, 2010

(AP) -- U.S. regulators earlier this year demanded improvements to the pipeline network that includes a segment that ruptured in southern Michigan, spilling hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil into the Kalamazoo River, ...

Recommended for you

Supervolcanoes: A key to America's electric future?

August 16, 2017

Most of the lithium used to make the lithium-ion batteries that power modern electronics comes from Australia and Chile. But Stanford scientists say there are large deposits in sources right here in America: supervolcanoes.

Climate change will cut crop yields: study

August 15, 2017

Climate change will have a negative effect on key crops such as wheat, rice, and maize, according to a major scientific report out Tuesday that reviewed 70 prior studies on global warming and agriculture.

How friction evolves during an earthquake

August 15, 2017

By simulating earthquakes in a lab, engineers at Caltech have documented the evolution of friction during an earthquake—measuring what could once only be inferred, and shedding light on one of the biggest unknowns in earthquake ...

Carbon offsets have wide-ranging environmental benefits

August 15, 2017

You can't grow money on trees, but you can earn money for letting trees grow. Or at least you can through a pioneering California program that allows forest owners around the United States to sell carbon credits to companies ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.