The impact of candidates' statements about climate change on electoral success

Candidates gain votes by taking a "green" position on climate change -- endorsing the existence of warming, human causation, and the need for taking action to address it, according to a new study of U.S. adults.

Among citizens who are and Independents, a hypothetical U.S. Senate candidate gained votes by making a green statement on and lost votes by making a not-green statement, compared to making no statement on climate. Among citizens who are , the candidate's vote share was unaffected by taking a green position or a not-green position, compared to being silent on climate.

These results suggest that by taking a green position on climate, candidates of either party can gain the votes of Democrats and Independents while not alienating Republicans.

These results are based on experiments embedded in telephone surveys of a representative national sample of American adults conducted in November 2010 and in telephone surveys of representative samples of adult residents of three states (Florida, Maine, and Massachusetts) in July 2010.


Explore further

Despite polarized opinions, Democrats and Republicans perform same amount of 'green' actions

More information: "The Impact of Candidates' Statements about Climate Change on Electoral Success in 2010: Experimental Evidences": woods.stanford.edu/docs/survey … ate_Politics2011.pdf
Citation: The impact of candidates' statements about climate change on electoral success (2011, July 5) retrieved 25 January 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2011-07-impact-candidates-statements-climate-electoral.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments