New algorithm provides new insights into evolutionary exodus out of Africa

Researchers have probed deeper into human evolution by developing an elegant new technique to analyse whole genomes from different populations. One key finding from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute's study is that African and non-African populations continued to exchange genetic material well after migration out-of-Africa 60,000 years ago. This shows that interbreeding between these groups continued long after the original exodus.

For the first time genomic archaeologists are able to infer population size and history using single genomes, a technique that makes fewer assumptions than existing methods, allowing for more detailed insights. It provides a fresh view of the history of mankind from 10,000 to one million years ago.

"Using this algorithm, we were able to provide new insights into our human history," says Dr Richard Durbin, joint head of and leader of the Genome Informatics Group at the Sanger Institute. "First, we see an apparent increase in effective human around the time that modern humans arose in Africa over 100,000 years ago.

"Second, when we look at non-African individuals from Europe and East Asia, we see a shared history of a dramatic reduction in population, or bottleneck, starting about 60,000 years ago, as others have also observed. But unlike previous studies we also see evidence for continuing genetic exchange with African populations for tens of thousands of years after the initial out-of-Africa bottleneck until 20,000 to 40,000 years ago.

"Previous methods to explore these questions using have looked at a subset of the human genome. Our new approach uses the whole sequence of single individuals, and relies on fewer assumptions. Using such techniques we will be able to capitalize on the revolution in genome sequencing and analysis from projects such as The 1000 Genomes Project, and, as more people are sequenced, build a progressively finer detail picture of human genetic history."

The team sequenced and compared four male genomes: one each from China, Europe, Korea and West Africa respectively. The researchers found that, although the African and non-African populations might have started to differentiate as early as 100,000 to 120,000 years ago, they largely remained as one population until approximately 60,000 to 80,000 years ago.

Following this the European and East Asian ancestors went through a period where their effective population size crashed to approximately one-tenth of its earlier size, overlapping the period when modern human fossils and artefacts start to appear across Europe and Asia. But, for at least the first 20,000 years of this period, it appears that the out-of-Africa and were not genetically separated. A possible explanation could be that new emigrants from Africa continued to join the out-of-Africa populations long after the original exodus.

"This elegant tool provides opportunities for further research to enable us to learn more about population history," says co-author Heng Li, from the Sanger Institute. "Each human genome contains information from the mother and the father, and the differences between these at any place in the genome carry information about its history. Since the genome sequence is so large, we can combine the information from tens of thousands of different places in the genome to build up a composite history of the ancestral contributions to the particular individual who was sequenced.

"We can also get at the historical relationship between two different ancestral populations by comparing the X chromosomes from two males. This works because men only have one copy of the X chromosome each, so we can combine the X chromosomes of two men and treat them in the same way as the rest of the genome for one person, with the results telling us about the way in which the ancestral populations of the two men separated.

"The novel statistical method we developed is computationally efficient and doesn't make restrictive assumptions about the way that population size changed. Although not inconsistent with previous results, these findings allow new types of historical events to be explored, leading to new observations about the history of mankind."

The researchers believe that this technique can be developed further to enable even more fine-grained discoveries by sequencing multiple genomes from different populations. In addition, beyond human history, there is also the potential to investigate the population size history of other species for which a single sequence has been obtained.

Explore further

Ancient African exodus mostly involved men, geneticists find

More information: Inference of human population history from individual whole genome sequences. Li H, Durbin R. Nature 2011. DOI: 10.1038/nature10231
Citation: New algorithm provides new insights into evolutionary exodus out of Africa (2011, July 13) retrieved 21 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 13, 2011
In before "god did it."

Jul 13, 2011
When looking at this newly unveiled part of our history, it is rather fascinating to note that -in the United States at least- the pattern of interbreeding in modern times appears to have shifted from a North-South axis to a West-East one.

I just looked at the United States Census data for the year 2010; the most prevalent form of interracial coupling appears to be White male/Asian female, with 529.000 such marriages registered. This is followed by White female/Black male couples at 390.000 marriages.

Is a new pattern emerging which is overtaking the old one?

Jul 13, 2011
This all makes better sense if the current "African" population wasn't in Africa until about 60Kyears ago. The fact that man is the only primate in Africa with no immunity to the Green Monkey Virus would seem to support this hypothesis.

Jul 14, 2011
This all makes better sense if the current "African" population wasn't in Africa until about 60Kyears ago. The fact that man is the only primate in Africa with no immunity to the Green Monkey Virus would seem to support this hypothesis.

It should be no secret that most of the Mediterranean Sea was habitable land for much of the last 100k years. I have to suspect that when we look for where are ancestors were living 50-70k years ago, that was it.

Oh, and if you look at a map of the Med, you will realize that flooding of the Western Med would have preceded the flooding of the Eastern Med by perhaps tens of centuries.

Jul 14, 2011
In before "god did it."
Frank I recently read the Physorg terms of use. You aren't allowed to post on the site. You are supposed to be over 13 years old to do so. Even if your parents gave their permission it still against the rules for pre-adolescents to have an account.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more