Amazon cuts off California affiliates

(AP) -- Inc. and much smaller Inc. are cutting off their advertising affiliates in California because of a new state rule forcing online retailers to collect sales tax there.

In an email Wednesday to California-based affiliates, Seattle-based Amazon said it would cut ties with affiliates who reside in the nation's most populous state if the law became effective. Gov. Jerry Brown signed the law Wednesday as part of a larger state budget package.

The new rule requires online retailers to collect California if they have in-state affiliates. "Affiliate" is the term the online retailers use for individuals or companies who run websites that refer visitors to them and then get paid a commission on any resulting sales.

For Amazon affiliates, these fees vary from 4 percent to 15 percent of a sale.

This move doesn't affect the third-party sellers who sell items through Amazon says they already are responsible for determining what taxes must be collected on a sale and often include taxes in the prices they charge customers.

In its email, Amazon called California's new rule "unconstitutional" and "counterproductive." Amazon would not disclose how many affiliates it had in California, but in the it said that for more than a decade it has worked with "thousands" of people in the state.

Overstock also ended its relationship with California affiliates because of the new law, spokesman Roger Johnson confirmed Thursday. Overstock too declined to say how many affiliates in California refer sales to it, but it said they number "in the hundreds."

Passage of the law, which is projected to net $200 million annually, adds California to a growing list of states that have enacted such legislation in hopes of bringing in more tax revenue. Its legislature passed such a law in 2009, but then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it.

Billions of dollars are at as a growing number of states look for ways to generate more revenue without violating a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that prohibits a state from forcing businesses to collect sales taxes unless the business has a physical presence, such as a store, in that state. When consumers order from out-of-state retailers, they're supposed to pay the tax that is due, but they rarely do and it's difficult to enforce.

States are trying to get around the Supreme Court restriction by passing laws that broaden the definition of a physical presence. Online retailers, meanwhile, are resisting being deputized as tax collectors.

California will become the latest state in which Amazon has parted ways with members of its Amazon Associates Program. Already it has said goodbye to affiliates in states including Arkansas, Connecticut and Illinois due to the passage of similar online sales tax laws. Salt Lake City-based Overstock also has shuttered its affiliate programs in several states due to the laws.

Amazon does collect sales taxes in North Dakota, Kansas, Kentucky and its home state of Washington. It collects in New York, too, as it fights the state over a 2008 law that was the first to consider local affiliates enough of an in-state presence to require sales tax collection.

Explore further

Amazon to cut off California-based Web affiliates

©2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Citation: Amazon cuts off California affiliates (2011, June 30) retrieved 21 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 30, 2011
Pity poor Amazon, the Walmart of web retail...and only based(as a corporation) in Seattle, as it has farmed out most distribution and fulfilment operations to low-income areas throughout the US of A- the only reason why it hasn't fully offshored all that labor is because it's a helluva lot more expensive to ship an Ipad from China than from Lompoc. Piss on Amazon! Why aren't they crying their righteous outrage from the highest heights over the fact that every other retailer has to collect sales tax?

Jun 30, 2011
The other retailers have to collect sales tax because they have little choice. BTW, increasing taxes is like the Federal Reserve raising interest rates because it increases costs on employers. If you want to truly stimulate the economy, costs must be lowered for employers to do business. Why? Because employers know about building productivity/efficiency for their business better than anyone else outside their business. Therefore, they can be better stewards of their tiny segment of the economy and make money flow faster and smoother. Raising expenses should only be used to prevent an economy in full swing from burning out.

If the objective is too raise revenue from the private sector, then don't leach more life out of the private sector. Let the private sector be the private sector.

Jul 01, 2011
Where was that story in physorg that said taxes are not important?

Jul 01, 2011
A completely reasonable move on Amazon's part - pity it was deemed necessary.

I simply don't get why anyone would have a problem with Amazon over this, seeing how the Californian lawmakers are completely responsible for creating the situation.

To blast Amazon for responding sensibly, when they have a right to respond (within the boundaries of the law) however they see fit, whether sensible or not, is just bizarre.

Jul 01, 2011
Back in the 18th century taxes were about 10% for everyone. Amazon is right to stand up against this aberrant behavior.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more