US privacy groups welcome 'Do Not Track' bill

Privacy and consumer groups welcomed a "Do Not Track" bill introduced in the US Senate on Monday that would let Internet users block companies from gathering information about their online activities.

The Do-Not-Track Online Act of 2011 was introduced by Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

"Recent reports of privacy invasions have made it imperative that we do more to put consumers in the driver's seat when it comes to their personal information," Rockefeller said in a statement.

"Consumers have a right to decide whether their information can be collected and used online," he said. "This bill offers a simple, straightforward way for people to stop companies from tracking their movements online."

Rockefeller's bill would create a "legal obligation" for online companies to honor the choice of consumers who say they do not want to be tracked online and give the Federal Trade Commission the power to pursue any company that does not honor the request.

Rockefeller's bill comes amid a flurry of privacy legislation in the US Congress and on the local-state level.

US senators John Kerry and John McCain unveiled an online privacy bill last month and two members of the US House of Representatives released a draft last week of a separate "Do Not Track" bill aimed at protecting children online.

"Do Not Track" legislation has also been introduced in the California state senate, drawing criticism from some companies reliant on tracking Web users for targeted advertising.

Rockefeller's bill was welcomed on Monday by the American Civil Liberties Union, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Consumer Watchdog, Consumer Action, and the Center for Digital Democracy.

Susan Grant of the Consumer Federation of America said it would "give Americans the right and the right tools to browse the Internet without their every click being tracked for marketing and other purposes."

"The current model creates an economic incentive for tracking and if consumers don't have the ability to 'opt-out' the result is going to be a detailed portrait of our online activities," said Chris Calabrese of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy said the bill strikes a balance between protecting the personal information of Web users and the needs of businesses to conduct electronic commerce.

"The bill shows that you can protect privacy and also promote e-commerce because it allows websites to engage in the necessary data collection so they can generate robust revenues," Chester said.

Jamie Court of Consumer Watchdog noted that Mozilla, Microsoft and Apple are incorporating a mechanism into their Web browsers to send a "Do Not Track" message but there is currently no legal requirement that a website honor the request.

Court also welcomed provisions in the Rockefeller bill that would apply "Do Not Track" standards to mobile devices.

Apple and Google are to attend a congressional hearing on privacy on Tuesday following controversy over location-sharing features on the iPhone and Google's Android devices.


Explore further

US lawmakers plan 'Do Not Track' bills (Update)

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: US privacy groups welcome 'Do Not Track' bill (2011, May 9) retrieved 15 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-05-privacy-groups-track-bill.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 09, 2011
Thing is, it's unenforceable anyway.

Google's ads not only track you, they run an a.i. to try to determine ads related to websites or products you viewed in the past.

If a website, plug-in, app, or device is put out by a company over seas, in many cases it will not be possible for the U.S. government to legally enforce.

Wundergrounddotcome will be forced to close, I think, because his website steals information about it's users, both from their posts and directly from their computers, and sells it to advertisers.

I once mentioned in a blog on that site that I happened to have a headache. Even though my contact informaton was private, within a minute of making the post, I got a telephone call from some headache specialist clinic halfway across the country.

Basicly, all of the major applications and plugins have spyware in them, and I'm talking primary vendors: Google, Microsoft, Apple; not third party software. All of them have trojan spywares in their products.

May 09, 2011
^ paranoid android.

Stop surfing all those tranny porn sites on IE and you'll be fine.

May 10, 2011
You send a command request to the servers to "opt out". The servers have to remember this choice by storing data. Then the list of persons who opted out can be given to the authority for likely illegal activities..neat.
The only solution is to surf EVERYWHERE, whether manually or by automation, so no patterns can be found and judged.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more