Kenyans swap carbon roles to save forest

March 8, 2011 by Otto Bakano
A man waters tree seedlings bought from communities surrounding Maungu, a village some 304 kilometres southeast of Kenyan capital, Nairobi, as part of an effort to move away from a decades-old, and largely illegal, practice of chopping down forest for charcoal making.

Mwakitau Kaleghe used to scratch out a living from burning charcoal, culled from trees whose felling helped turn a rich tropical woodland in southern Kenya into a desolate mosaic.

Today, though, sees Kaleghe, 65, enlisted in an environmental war, as a captor of carbon rather than an emitter of it and as a custodian of Rukinga forest rather than an agent in its destruction.

Kaleghe nurtures tree seedlings that he then sells to a UN-backed project carbon-credit project.

Trees suck up (CO2), the principal that traps .

Under the Reducing Emissions from and Degradation (REDD) initiative, CO2 emitters in industrialised countries can "offset" their pollution by conserving or replanting cleared or damaged areas.

Wildlife Works, a US conservation group, says 30,000 hectares (75,000 acres) of forest are under its wing in the Rukinga REDD scheme.

It has sealed a deal with South Africa's Nedbank group, keen to establish "carbon-neutral" credentials, for the sale of 200,000 tonnes of CO2 for around one million dollars.

Some of the proceeds are earmarked for local projects to give the community alternative sources of income other than clearing land for and charcoal burning.

"If they buy the seedlings at a good price, I think we can make ends meet," said Kaleghe.

"I used to make good money from selling charcoal but I won't start making charcoal again because that is destroying the forest."

Carbon credit projects (like one pictured here in Maungu, Kenya) entail complex calculations about vegetation cover, soil content and duration to estimate the amount of CO2 that is lost through deforestation and land degradation.

Apart from tree planting, the project also runs a garment factory that sells clothes for export and plans to pipe water to the community.

"With the projects lined up, the community is very happy. At the moment we are living in hope," said James Mwakina Mboga, the local councillor, who sounds however a note of caution.

"If the promises don't materialise, then we will go back to our old ways," he said, referring to the rampant burning and subsistence farming that denuded and exhausted the soil.

Carbon credit projects entail complex calculations about vegetation cover, soil content and duration to estimate the amount of CO2 that is lost through deforestation and land degradation.

Projects also have to be vetted to ensure they are not scams by loggers.

The Rukinga carbon credits are a milestone, though.

They are the first to be issued under a new benchmark, called the Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS), which seeks to uphold criteria of sustainability, ecological soundness and help for the local community.

Wildlife Works, an international green organisation, has so far managed to conserve some 75,000 acres of typical forest at Rukinga Wildlife Ranch in Maungu by creating awareness of the benefits of a swap from forest destruction for charcoal to selling carbon credits.

Eventually, 30 million tonnes of CO2 will be saved over 20 years, Wildlife Works hopes.

Reforestation should also be a boon for biodiversity. The forest straddles the east and west sides of Tsavo National Park, Kenya's largest, and its renewal eventually will provide a corridor for migrating wildlife.

The strategy also involves the community, which forms committees to choose the most important projects they want funded. In this arid region, water tops the list, then roads, education or health.

Rob Dodson, who heads Rukinga Wildlife Works, said he saw widespread support from local people who had been aware, bit by bit, of the degradation of the forest and its impact on their lives.

"It is such a desperate situation... the people can see what is happening," he said.

"They can see the rainfall decreasing year after year. They know that subsistence farming isn't working. They've been so receptive, they're willing to try anything that could be an alternative."

Explore further: Towards an efficient, effective and equitable REDD+

Related Stories

Towards an efficient, effective and equitable REDD+

December 7, 2010

An exclusive focus on forests -- as opposed to the entire landscape -- could lead to inequitable and destructive outcomes for the poor in developing countries, said a Nairobi-based agroforestry research organization today.

Recommended for you

How the Elwha dam removals changed the river's mouth

January 19, 2018

For decades, resource managers agreed that removing the two dams on the Elwha River would be a big win for the watershed as a whole and, in particular, for its anadromous trout and salmon. The dams sat on the river for more ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 09, 2011

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.