New model changes view of climate change

February 11, 2011 By Janet Lathrop, University of Massachusetts Amherst

( -- Using new, high-resolution global ocean circulation models, University of Massachusetts Amherst geoscientist Alan Condron, with Peter Winsor at the University of Alaska, report this week that massive glacial meltwaters assumed to have flooded the entire North Atlantic 8,200 years ago, drastically cooling Europe, instead flowed thousands of miles further south. "These results dramatically affect our understanding of what causes climate change," Condron says.

The events unfolded when the Laurentide , which covered much of Hudson Bay in Arctic Canada, gradually melted during a warm period about 8,200 years ago. The resulting glacial Lake Agassiz catastrophically broke through a kilometers-long ice dam at the bottom of the bay, suddenly dumping thousands of cubic kilometers of fresh water into the Atlantic Ocean.

Because this roughly coincided with the largest abrupt recorded in the last 10,000 years, classic geoscience theory had assumed that the flood covered the surface of the Labrador and Greenland Seas and subpolar gyre with lighter, warmer and less salty water to trigger the cooling. Scientists have assumed this slowed the Gulf Stream and ocean convection by disrupting the Thermohaline circulation, that is, the large-scale temperature- and salt-driven ocean current responsible for our current warm, stable climate.

However, Condron and Winsor’s new model, which is 10 to 20 times more powerful than previously attainable, suggests the freshwater flood of 8,200 years ago and others like it actually skirted past the subpolar gyre, instead traveling south by joining narrow, coast-hugging currents where water moves much faster than in the open ocean.

They summarize, "Using a high resolution, global, ocean-ice circulation model, we present an alternative view that freshwater discharged from glacial Lake Agassiz would have remained on the continental shelf as a narrow, buoyant, coastal current and would have been transported south into the subtropical North Atlantic."

If they’re correct and fresh water from Agassiz did end up in the much farther south, between 20 and 40 degrees of latitude in the subtropical gyre, it’s revolutionary. "Basically, our model says that this flood ended up 3,000 miles further south than we all thought. It’s observed at the same time as the climate change and cooling in Europe, but the picture is far more complicated and different than we’d assumed. We all thought it went much further north."

The new model runs on one of the world’s top supercomputers at the National Energy Research Science Computing Center in Berkeley, Calif. "With this higher resolution modeling, our ability to capture near-shore boundary currents dramatically changes our idea of where the fresh water may be going. Lower-resolution models very much miss the complexity and detail that are now available in our high-res model," the authors say. Their findings appear in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

Condron says the revised view is a result of much higher computational power available with faster computers. Older models weren’t powerful enough to catch these subtleties because they contained too few data points to capture smaller-scale, faster-moving coastal currents. "We’ve shown that the conceptual idea in which flood waters once covered the subpolar gyre derives from the inability of lower resolution numerical models to accurately resolve narrow coastal flows, and is likely incorrect," he adds.

The new model is strengthened, Condron says, by present-day evidence that this coastally confined freshwater pathway is the same route taken by water flowing out of Hudson Bay now. Further, paleooceanographic evidence from the coastal shelf ocean supports this new view. "When we look offshore in the open ocean there really is very little evidence for this flood event, but there are clear sedimentary deposits from a large flood along the shelf."

"Our results are particularly relevant for how we model the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets now and in the future. "It’s apparent from our results that climate scientists are artificially introducing fresh water into their models much too far north, into parts of the ocean that it never would have reached. This has strong implications for predicting and understanding the stability of our future climate," says Condron. "We’re in a similar interglacial period now, in the Holocene. The assumption is that the ocean looked and acted then much the same as it does today. So the coastal currents are assumed to be the same."

Their next step will be to understand the impact caused by this freshwater flooding into the subtropical, rather than the subpolar ocean to see if it may be related to cooling and climate disruption.

Explore further: Ice sheet melt identified as trigger of Big Freeze

Related Stories

Ice sheet melt identified as trigger of Big Freeze

March 31, 2010

The main cause of a rapid global cooling period, known as the Big Freeze or Younger Dryas - which occurred nearly 13,000 years ago - has been identified thanks to the help of an academic at the University of Sheffield.

Salty oceans provide early warning for climate change

June 8, 2007

Monitoring the saltiness of the ocean water could provide an early indicator of climate change. Significant increases or decreases in salt in key areas could forewarn of climate change in 10 to 20 years time. Presenting their ...

Arctic Ocean waters warm suddenly

October 7, 2005

Water flowing from the North Atlantic Ocean into the Arctic provides evidence that the Arctic Ocean is warming, according to U.S. and European researchers.

Recommended for you

Maximizing the environmental benefits of autonomous vehicles

February 15, 2018

The added weight, electricity demand and aerodynamic drag of the sensors and computers used in autonomous vehicles are significant contributors to their lifetime energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2011
I'd prefer their map to show the estimated coastlines during this episode: With so much ice and water bound on land, surely much of those continental shelves would be exposed ??

I'd hope this finding does mean that even a significant increase of run-off from eg Greenland is unlikely to provide a catastrophic 'tipping point' for the Gulf Stream...
4.5 / 5 (2) Feb 11, 2011
I'd prefer their map to show the estimated coastlines during this episode: With so much ice and water bound on land, surely much of those continental shelves would be exposed ??

I'd hope this finding does mean that even a significant increase of run-off from eg Greenland is unlikely to provide a catastrophic 'tipping point' for the Gulf Stream...

Likely not. I suspect that a huge inflow into the area where the gulf stream starts its migration north would also have a huge effect. But I am waiting for further analysis by people who know far more I on the subject.
2.4 / 5 (14) Feb 12, 2011
But, I thought our understanding of the climate was iron clad 5 years ago when we were preparing to make multi-trillion dollar economic decisions to limit growth and incur costs to scale back cheap energy, and transfer wealth to developing countries for control of carbon credits!

3.3 / 5 (7) Feb 13, 2011
Woops indeed. Science has become a new religion. Kiss the ring of the latest supercomputer, for only it knows the truth.
2 / 5 (4) Feb 13, 2011
Science has become a new religion.

And that religion is financed with our tax funds, as former President Eisenhower warned might happen in his farewell address on Jan 17, 1961:

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA principal
Investigator for Apollo
3 / 5 (2) Feb 13, 2011
Its called scientology or pseudo-science.
Science has nothing todo with religion..
1 / 5 (2) Feb 14, 2011
In my experiences, science (making measurements) and spirituality (meditation or contemplation) seem to be two different ways of "truthing:"

Getting closer to truth but always knowing that more will always be revealed later.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
3 / 5 (4) Feb 14, 2011
Dogmatic scientists and dogmatic religionists are almost identical twins.

"Truthing" is a process of ego reduction.

Claiming you have truth is a sure sign of failure.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.