Stardust flyby '1,000 percent successful'

Stardust flyby '1,000 percent successful'
This pair of images shows the area affected by the impactor released by NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft in July 2005. On the left, the image from Deep Impact shows a dark mound about 50 meters (160 feet) in size. It is inside a yellow circle that shows the area hit by the impactor released by Deep Impact. The image on the right, newly obtained by NASA's Stardust spacecraft, shows the impactor erased that dark mound and flattened the area. The outer circle annotated on the right-hand image shows the outer rim of the crater and the inner circle shows the crater floor. The crater is estimated to be 150 meters (500 feet) in diameter. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Maryland/Cornell

In most cases, a Valentine's Day rendezvous that resembles a flight through artillery fire is less than ideal.

But for the hardy Stardust , a close encounter with the 88.2-billion-ton (40 trillion kg) on the evening of Feb. 14 was well worth the experience.

"If you ask me, was this mission 100 percent successful in terms of the science? I would have to say -- no," said Joe Veverka, professor of astronomy and principal investigator for NASA's Stardust-NExT mission, at a press conference Feb. 15. "It was 1,000 percent successful."

The mission sent the , which collected dust from the in 2004 and dropped it off on Earth in 2006, on a second assignment: this time to Tempel 1 for a new look at the comet that was first visited by the spacecraft in 2005.

Stardust flyby '1,000 percent successful'
This composite image was taken by NASA's Stardust spacecraft 42 hours before its encounter with comet Tempel 1. It is the last image by the spacecraft's navigation camera before its encounter in the evening hours of Feb. 14. The image is a composite of four, five-second exposures. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell

Six years ago, Deep Impact sent an 800-pound probe smashing into Tempel 1, giving scientists new information about the comet's structure and composition -- but also creating a plume of ejecta that obscured the resulting crater.

One of the new mission's goals, therefore, was to get a first look at that crater, which could tell researchers more about how the comet formed and evolved. Scientists also hoped to see how the comet's surface changed after an orbit around the sun, and to get a look at terrain that hadn't been seen before.

The met all three objectives, Veverka said. Among the 72 resulting high-resolution images, some show the crater, which is about 150 meters in diameter with a small mound of debris in the center -- material that was sent flying by the impact and fell back to the surface.

Other images show an area that was heavily pitted in 2005, but is smoothed out in the new images, indicating substantial erosion. And images of new territory show a variety of intriguing features, including areas of extensive layering.

"To understand how this comet works, we have to put everything together," Veverka said.

The spacecraft also used two external instruments to detect and analyze the dust surrounding the comet's nucleus. And at just 112 miles (181 km) apart at closest approach, there was a lot of dust to fly through -- not to mention larger particles that battered the spacecraft in fits and starts.

"This is the way comets act," said Don Brownlee, Stardust-NExT co-investigator and astronomy professor at the University of Washington. "They don't just spew off things in a uniform way. They send it out in bursts and puffs ... clods of dirt and ice and rock that come apart. So a good analogy [would be] a B17 in World War II flying through flak."

Overall, it was an exceptional mission, Veverka said, and a thrill to use a spacecraft that had already completed one mission to observe the aftermath of another.

And crucial to the mission were the scientists and engineers around the world who positioned the spacecraft at exactly the right place at the right time, he added. "That was a great achievement," he said. "We are tremendously happy."

Stardust-NExT is managed by JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, for the NASA Science Mission Directorate. Lockheed Martin Space Systems built the spacecraft and manages day-to-day mission operations.

Explore further

NASA comet hunter spots its Valentine

Provided by Cornell University
Citation: Stardust flyby '1,000 percent successful' (2011, February 21) retrieved 19 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 21, 2011

"We set our standards and expectations very low. This makes it easier to exceed them by an order of magnitude!" - NASA/JPL

"We discovered ice and dust on a comet, which we already knew. It was cratered, which we already knew. It eroded some, which we already knew. It had "organic" compounds (i.e. methane ice,) which we already knew. This is fantastic! It only cost a half billion dollars!" - NASA/JPL.

Feb 21, 2011
QC: Knowing and suspecting are two very different things. Also knowing the exact content in % and layers is much different than knowing what physical components make it up. (EX. Hydrogen peroxide and water are made of the same stuff, but are very different, no?)

Feb 22, 2011
I recall the event. I viewed the impact plume briefly through my 11 inch Celestron. Low in the western sky, in early evening in the S. Cal sky. Faint, but distinct. Only visible for a minute or two. Nice shot. Too bad the recent moon bomb was less successful. Big build-up, then silence for weeks. Supposed to be an immediate press conference. Why the silence? Plume contained inside a cavern???

Feb 22, 2011
"I viewed the impact plume briefly through my 11 inch Celestron. Low in the western sky, in early evening in the S. Cal sky. Faint, but distinct. Only visible for a minute or two."

I'm not sure what you saw but professional astronomers, employing an array of telescopes (with apertures larger than 11 inches and using sensitive CCD cameras), did not report any large brightness fluctuations or flash at the time of impact:


The comet was observed however to slowly increase in brightness over the next several hours.

Btw, the flash and plume generated by the LCROSS lunar impact was most definitely observed:


How else could scientists have determined the ejecta's chemical composition?

Did they make it up?

Did they do the same with the Deep Impact observations?

Why your (continued) distortion of the FACTS?

Feb 22, 2011
The impact observation was certainly fleeting, but at right place at right time in the sky. Still, we could be mistaken. Only two of us out of a dozen amateurs managed to see something.

NASA scrambled at Northrope on the morning of the lunar impact, cancelling a scheduled news conference at their own PR event. I knew an engineer on the project. He was baffled. NASA silence during a scheduled PR event? Confusion?

I also witnessed the entire 2nd EVA of Apollo 17 on the big screen at NASA as it happened uninterrupted. Still waiting for them to come clean on that one! Don't trust NASA PR. At least some data is pre-scrubbed.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more