Magnetism relieves electrons of their resistance

December 13, 2010, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Looking for magnetic interactions: A technician adjusts the spectrometer which a team of physicists, headed by Oliver Stockert at the Institut Laue-Langevin in Grenoble, use to measure neutron scattering in a compound of cerium, copper and silicon. These experiments reveal the magnetic fluctuations of a material. According to this experiment, the superconductivity in CeCu2Si2 is caused by magnetic interactions. Image: P. Avavian for CEA Grenoble
( -- Physics is sometimes just like a criminal investigation. Researchers gather one piece of evidence after another in order to solve a mystery - for example, the question as to how unconventional superconductivity is caused, something which is also of particular interest for technical applications.

An international team involving scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids has now provided the strongest evidence yet that can bring about this form of zero-resistance current transport - something that physicists have been gathering evidence for, for some time. It is becoming more and more apparent that a notorious troublemaker can also be cooperative: conventional in normal metals is namely easily destroyed by magnetic fields. The fact that magnetism makes unconventional superconductivity possible, however, could also provide clues in the search for that transport current without loss in day-to-day applications. (, online publication, December 12, 2010)

The picture that physicists have of unconventional superconductors is gradually becoming clearer. These materials also include the complexly-structured which conduct current without losses, even at relatively high temperatures. These temperatures are still below minus 135 degrees Celsius, however - too cold for wide-scale everyday application. In order to systematically shift this limit to a higher value, physicists first have to understand how the superconductivity arises in these materials. "Our findings make an important contribution to this understanding," says Frank Steglich, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids in Dresden and head of the investigation. One of the things that the researchers have discovered is that the magnetic interactions in the material provide enough energy to put the material into the superconducting state.

The researchers working with Frank Steglich collaborated with colleagues from the Julich Center for Neutron Science at the Institut Laue-Langevin in Grenoble, the TU Dresden, Rice University in Houston, Texas and the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems in Dresden to investigate CeCu2Si2 - a chemical compound of cerium, copper and silicon. This compound was identified as the first unconventional superconductor more than three decades ago and consequently kicked off the search for new mechanisms of superconductivity. In the meantime, the researchers now understand how to change the electronic state of the material: a small deficiency in copper causes the material to become anti-ferromagnetic; with a tiny excess, it becomes a superconductor. The work here must always be carried out close to absolute zero - the material is therefore unsuitable for practical applications: "We are interested in understanding the principle, however," says Oliver Stockert, who has played a crucial role in the investigations at the Dresden Max Planck Institute. CeCu2Si2 is particularly well-suited to this purpose because, in this compound, electrons of a certain type, the so-called 4f electrons of the cerium atoms, are involved in both the superconductivity and the magnetism.

In the magnetic version of the material the spins of the 4f electrons, which turn them into tiny bar magnets, give rise to the anti-ferromagnetic order of the material: this can be imagined in a simple picture where the tiny magnets lie next to each other with alternating north and south poles. In the superconducting version of CeCu2Si2, 4f electrons flow into the reservoir from which Cooper pairs form - electron pairs whose quantum properties make them invisible to the crystal lattice and which can therefore move through it unhindered. Simultaneously, the anti-ferromagnetic order disappears and the individual magnetic moments of the 4f electrons are no longer visible to the outside. "In this respect, our cerium compound basically behaves as we would expect a conventional superconductor to do," says Oliver Stockert.

The physicist and his colleagues have, however, looked at the magnetic moments in the superconducting version in detail. To this end, they conducted experiments at the Jülich Centre for Neutron Science at the Institut Laue-Langevin in Grenoble which involved bombarding a sample of the superconducting material with neutrons that also have a spin and therefore a magnetic moment. They thus excited the magnetic moments in the CeCu2Si2, i.e. caused them to spin around, in simplified terms. This only worked when the energy of the neutrons exceeded a certain threshold, however. It is precisely this minimum of energy which is required to break up the superconducting electron pairs.

This on its own is not enough to prove that the magnetic exchange binds the Cooper pairs together in the unconventional superconductors. "The magnetic interactions in the superconducting material release ten times more energy than the formation of the Cooper pairs, however," says Oliver Stockert: "It seems apparent that the magnetic interactions therefore make the unconventional superconductivity possible." After all, nature does everything it can to save energy. And, in this respect, the magnetic exchange seems to be particularly advantageous, especially in the superconductor.

The team has gleaned this knowledge from extensive measurement data of neutron scattering. This not only told the researchers how the strength of the magnetic excitations changes with their energy, but that it also depends on the direction in which they propagate in the crystal. The theoretical physicists at the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems and Rice University have used this knowledge to calculate the energy saving for the magnetic exchange.

And the team found another clue to the magnetic go-between role in unconventional superconductivity: they repeated their experiments at different temperatures close to absolute zero. The closer they came to this point, the more pronounced the anti-ferromagnetic order became - physicists then say that the spin fluctuations become longer-lived close to magnetic order.

CeCu2Si2 is therefore not only the first unconventional superconductor, which was discovered by Frank Steglich more than 30 years ago, as Qimiao Si, participating theoretician from Rice University, emphasizes: "The compound is also distinguished by the fact that we are unequivocally able to identify the observed spin fluctuations as quantum-critical fluctuations." These fluctuations are based on a quantum effect, which is why the point in whose vicinity they occur is called the quantum-critical point. "The fact that we observe superconductivity around this point also provides evidence that magnetic interactions bring about the formation of the Cooper pairs," says Oliver Stockert.

It remains to be seen why the exchange in the superconductor gives rise to such a large energy gain. Moreover, the physicists have still to discover the extent to which their findings can be applied to those materials that become superconducting at relatively high temperatures. "We are certain that we are on the right track with our investigations, however", says Frank Steglich. He and his colleagues will therefore continue to gather evidence in order to solve the mysteries surrounding unconventional superconductivity.

Explore further: Scientists prove unconventional superconductivity in new iron arsenide compounds

More information: O. Stockert, J. Arndt, E. Faulhaber, C. Geibel, H. S. Jeevan, S. Kirchner, M. Loewenhaupt, K. Schmalzl, W. Schmidt, Q. Si and F. Steglich, Magnetically driven superconductivity in CeCu2Si2, Nature Physics, published online, December 12, 2010, DOI:10.1038/NPHYS1852

Related Stories

Brown physicist discovers odd, fluctuating magnetic waves

February 23, 2010

At the quantum level, the forces of magnetism and superconductivity exist in an uneasy relationship. Superconducting materials repel a magnetic field, so to create a superconducting current, the magnetic forces must be strong ...

Stripes offer clues to superconductivity

May 17, 2010

New images of iron-based superconductors are providing telltale clues to the origin of superconductivity in a class of ceramic materials known as pnictides. The images reveal that electrons responsible for the superconducting ...

Tiny superconductors withstand stronger magnetic fields

February 4, 2005

Ultrathin superconducting wires can withstand stronger magnetic fields than larger wires made from the same material, researchers now report. This finding may be useful for technologies that employ superconducting magnets, ...

Many roads lead to superconductivity

September 10, 2010

Since their discovery in 2008, a new class of superconductors has precipitated a flood of research the world over. Unlike the previously familiar copper ceramics (cuprates), the basic structure of this new class consists ...

Recommended for you

Sculpting stable structures in pure liquids

February 21, 2019

Oscillating flow and light pulses can be used to create reconfigurable architecture in liquid crystals. Materials scientists can carefully engineer concerted microfluidic flows and localized optothermal fields to achieve ...

How to freeze heat conduction

February 21, 2019

Physicists have discovered a new effect, which makes it possible to create excellent thermal insulators which conduct electricity. Such materials can be used to convert waste heat into electrical energy.

Water is more homogeneous than expected

February 21, 2019

In order to explain the known anomalies in water, some researchers assume that water consists of a mixture of two phases, even under ambient conditions. However, new X-ray spectroscopic analyses at BESSY II, ESRF and Swiss ...

Correlated nucleons may solve 35-year-old mystery

February 20, 2019

A careful re-analysis of data taken at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a possible link between correlated protons and neutrons in the nucleus and a 35-year-old mystery. ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 13, 2010
how about running pulsed microwaves over a thin flat surface made out of material with superconducting potential, perhaps these waves provide an additional tool to selectively and dynamically stimulate/modulate the electron states in the material and could deliver tiny nudges to keep the electrons flowing even at higher temperature, folding these flat surfaces into a box shaped pipe you would have a waveguide (like used in radar equipment) so that you could recaptured much of the unused wave energy with an antenna, effectively doing part of what the cooling trick does but at lower energy cost and also lessing the threshold for any additional cooling so that cheaper cooling equipment can be used
1 / 5 (4) Dec 13, 2010
But not a part of our world holding new materials, so it's still asymmetric versus magnetism.
not rated yet Dec 13, 2010
wow, is that a human generated response from our Dutch mystery man?
not rated yet Dec 13, 2010
well i sort of stand corrected just read here
that waveguides have skin effect messing with the copper surface electron states and to get more resistive, but it does show my point that as i suspected indeed the waves be able to induce electron states and the magnetic domains in the material, so there is still an option to investigate guide shapes and waves of different frequencies/envelopes to make the skin effect work not work for the sake of low absorbsion while guiding a radar wave, but instead for lower resistance instead in the boxmaterial.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 14, 2010
I've said it many times before in various PhysOrg posts. Synchronized oscillations produce superconductivity. This report is another instance. Art Winfree developed a theory of coupled oscillators in the 1960s and applied it to the biological world. Take that same theory and apply it to physics, and recognize that the quantum world is a world of limit cycle oscillators--which is the one and only condition that Winfree required for the application of his theory. The oscillations that synchronize may vary among the supers (superconductors, superfluids, and even superfluid light) but there is one common denominator--all oscillations of some type in the material (or light) synchronize and create coherent relationships. If you need a visual image, think of a swarm of starlings, flying in a coherent but somewhat loose wave. Now imagine that each starling is connected to six surrounding starlings by synchronized quantized oscillations. The swarm will behave as one.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 14, 2010
The report indicates that magnetic interactions (oscillations, to use Winfree's term)cause superconductivity. My guess is that the magnetic interactions synchronize precisely, producing antisynchronous spins which drive the formation of Cooper pairs, and synchronize each Cooper pair with all others. This extensive synchrony also yields excess energy. In short, the "magnetic exchange" described in the article is probably a case of synchronized oscillations--the oscillations here being electromagnetic waves. The tiny excess of copper creates the tipping point. The result is a synchronized quantized swarm of 4 f electrons. It should not surprise us that magnetic fields, the "notorious troublemaker" for superconductivity, can also produce superconductivity. The issue is whether the oscillations from the magnetic field interfere with otherwise synchronized oscillations (bad) or synchronize electrons that are not already themselves synchronized (good). Simple case of Winfree's theory.
not rated yet Dec 18, 2010
Sounds eerily like Steorn's magnetic perpetual motion machine. Failing that comparison this does sound important to the goal of room temp superconductivity.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 21, 2010
Continuing with the "synchronized oscillations" theme in my prior posts, consider the following. In conventional superconductivity (meaning BCS, Cooper pairs, low temp), we know that phonons (aka oscillations) synchronize with the electrons, forming Cooper pairs, which are simply pairs of electrons that have synchronized their two primary oscillations--orbit and spin. (All I have done here is translate the BCS theory from French to English, so to speak.) Is that really any different from the "unconventional" case described in this article? My view of the facts described in the article is that a different type of oscillation--magnetic oscillations--plays the role that phonons play in conventional superconductivity. This revised interpretation of the facts in the two instances of superconductivity creates, possibly, a perfectly sensible unified explanation of superconductivity. Winfree's theory, adapted as I propose to the quantum world, satisfies Ockham's Razor.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 24, 2010
I wish Karl Popper were alive. "Magnetism always makes trouble for superconductivity." "Cooper pairs are always formed by phonons." No black swans around here.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.