The science behind deception

September 20, 2010

Think you can tell when people are lying? After decades of accepted methods for detecting lies, communications PhD student Edward Reynolds may have a case for challenging those tactics.

Using popular television programs Cops and The Jeremy Kyle Show, Reynolds studied response latencies between questions and answers.

Mr. Reynolds spent hours studying footage, looking for instances where a lie and an admission were both on tape.

Historically, experts have used speech tempos to determine lying, and suggested long pauses between questions and answers imply responders may be telling a lie.

Mr. Reynolds found regular gaps in respondent answers occurred equally in both lies and non-lie replies.

"Silence is used in talk for a range of interaction functions, and is not just a cue that could indicate ," he said.

In the past, have used participants in controlled experiments, whereas Mr. Reynolds observed the television guests in a natural setting, using the sociological method of "conversation analysis" to analyse the lies, similar to an .

"I was actually expecting to find some evidence of any sort of 'cue to deception' in my data, when I found none I was surprised," he said.

Published in the British Journal of Social Psychology, the research highlights the need to analyse lies in the context they are told.

Mr. Reynolds also emphasizes the importance of taking the conversation leading up to the question into account.

"For professionals who need to detect lying, this research means they should pay more attention to what they already know about the person, rather than 'cues'," he said.

Mr. Reynolds' investigation concluded that blame shifting responses are often indicators of upcoming "trouble", rather than being directly related to lying.

"Future research cannot overlook the research in conversational analysis and , which have investigated the same phenomena in speech, like umm's and pauses," he said.

For those trying to detect fibbers, Mr Reynolds said trusting your instincts is always a good move.

"If there is something odd in the way someone talks, use your own social skills to work it out; hi-tech science can't do any better than 'natural' ways to detect lies," he said.

Explore further: Study: Execs blinded by bottom line

Related Stories

Study: Execs blinded by bottom line

January 9, 2006

A researcher says corporations like Enron that overemphasize profits might make their leaders blind to ethical or moral issues.

Eddies against the wall

July 27, 2010

Fluids experts writing in the journal Physics of Fluids, which is published by the American Institute of Physics, are projecting it will be many decades before we can accurately probe the properties of turbulence near walls. ...

New lie detection technique for terror suspects

September 5, 2006

A leading deception expert has called for law enforcement agencies to do away with lie detector tests when questioning terror suspects because they are too unreliable.

Setting sail in an ecological 'Earthship'

October 13, 2009

Could sustainable architecture address pollution, climate change and resource depletion by helping us build self-sufficient, off-grid, housing from "waste", including vehicle tires and metal drinks containers? That's the ...

Trusting people make better lie detectors

August 13, 2010

Trusting others may not make you a fool or a Pollyanna, according to a study in the current Social Psychological and Personality Science. Instead it can be a sign that you're smart.

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (4) Sep 20, 2010
finally, a scicnece that the soviets can dominate, with other marxists...
1 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2010
Okay Dr. Pepper. Next you'll tell us to try a somersault!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.