Lobster dieoffs linked to chemicals in plastics

August 10, 2010
A lobster showing symptoms of shell disease. Photo courtesy of Rhode Island Sea Grant

New research shows that chemicals found in plastics and detergents can exacerbate lobster diseases.

Lobsters in Long Island Sound have suffered intense dieoffs in the past decade, and a peculiar affliction, known as “shell disease,” has been a major contributor. Now, a molecular biologist at the University of Connecticut has discovered that waterborne chemicals, leached from plastics and detergents, may contribute to the disease in in the Sound.

Hans Laufer, a research professor in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, has found that by interfering with hormones crucial to young lobster growth, chemicals such as A can slow the lobsters’ molting patterns and interfere with regular development, leading to body deformations, susceptibility to disease, and potential death.

Laufer will join researchers from 15 other New England institutions this week to present the results of a three-year, $3 million research initiative at the 9th Annual Ronald C. Baird Sea Grant Science Symposium, taking place at the University of Rhode Island. The New England Lobster Research Initiative examined the causes of lobster shell disease and the contributing factors that make lobsters vulnerable to the disease.

Lobster shell disease has been a contentious issue in Connecticut since the beginning of a massive lobster die-off in Long Island Sound in the late 1990s. In the past decade, the state’s commercial lobster catch has plummeted, with catches falling to about one-sixth of their 1998 levels. Factors such as mosquito insecticides and warming temperatures have been implicated as potential risk factors for the disease, which creates dark lesions on the outside of the lobsters’ shells that, over time, bore through the shell to the membranes underneath.

The new research Laufer is presenting at the conference showed that chemicals found in and detergents may make lobsters more susceptible to the disease. He and his colleagues identified “hotspots” in the Sound where lobsters have high levels of alkylphenols - a group of chemicals derived from detergents, paints, and plastics - circulating in their bodies. The lobsters take in these chemicals from their food, mostly mollusks such as clams and mussels that filter the chemicals from the water. In the western Long Island Sound, the southern shore of Massachusetts, and Cape Cod Bay, as many as half of the lobsters surveyed were contaminated with the chemicals.

In the laboratory, Laufer has also shown that moderate levels of chemicals can double the amount of time it takes for a lobster to molt its shell and to create a hardened new shell. During this time, the lobsters’ thin skin is more vulnerable to pathogens, such as the bacteria that cause shell disease. By increasing the length of this vulnerable period, the ocean-borne chemicals effectively increase the chances that a lobster will get sick.

Laufer says these effects likely occur because the chemicals can mimic certain lobster hormones.

“Alkylphenols have phenomenal juvenile hormone activity,” he says. “Juvenile hormone controls things like growth, reproduction, metamorphosis, and development.”

Lobster larvae with moderate levels of alkylphenols in their blood retain juvenile characteristics, he says, such as spiny tails and short antennae. This makes them less likely to survive in the wild.

To make matters worse, lobsters have also been observed to molt their shells more often when afflicted with shell disease. Molting is the only effective way for lobsters to temporarily rid themselves of the disease, but mother lobsters afflicted by the disease have been observed to molt even when carrying eggs on the undersides of their shells, and this effectively kills their unborn offspring.

Chemicals like alkylphenols are washed into waterways mainly from landfill and water treatment facilities, and eventually find their way to the ocean. Of the about 1 million tons of BPA produced annually, 60 percent of it ends up in the ocean.

Laufer says that the only way to reduce the chemicals’ impact on living things is to reduce our use of plastics.

“Plastics are everywhere, but plastic recycling is easy,” he says. “We need to reuse plastics instead of throwing them away, and increase our use of plastic substitutes, like cardboard and glass bottles.”
Aside from being a concern for the fisheries industry, Laufer also thinks that alkylphenol contamination is a serious threat to human health. About 90 percent of the U.S. population are also contaminated with alkylphenols, which in some cases - such as BPA - have been shown to affect human reproduction. The effects of many other alkylphenols remain largely unknown, but he suspects that if they are hazardous to lobsters, they’re probably hazardous to humans, too.

“This is as big a threat to human health as tobacco,” Laufer says. “Many companies are saying that they’re safe, but they’re not.”

Explore further: Lobsters Avoid Virus by Detecting Illness in Their Own Kind

Related Stories

Unusual orange lobster saved from the pot

August 6, 2010

What's unusual about this orange lobster? Its alive! Lobsters are usually a brownish-green colour when living and turn orange when they have been cooked. But a rare live reddish-orange coloured specimen has been spotted in ...

Lobster telescope has an eye for X-rays

April 4, 2006

UK astronomers have been at the forefront of designing a revolutionary new X-ray telescope that is based on the eyes of a lobster. By replicating the crustacean’s ability to observe objects all around it without turning ...

New Research Model Improves Lobster Population Forecasting

July 13, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Managing the Gulf of Maine’s $300 million lobster industry has been a practice mostly reliant upon the physical size of adult stocks, a system called stock assessment and one that’s made policymaking ...

Recommended for you

The astonishing efficiency of life

November 17, 2017

All life on earth performs computations – and all computations require energy. From single-celled amoeba to multicellular organisms like humans, one of the most basic biological computations common across life is translation: ...

Unexpected finding solves 40-year old cytoskeleton mystery

November 17, 2017

Scientists have been searching for it for decades: the enzyme that cuts the amino acid tyrosine off an important part of the cell's skeleton. Researchers of the Netherlands Cancer Institute have now identified this mystery ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Aug 11, 2010
I am glad they did not just look at the statistics and say it was all because of global warming. That is what the statisticians would have done.

These plastics are classed as safe because they did not affect mice much and showed no immediate damage to people - but DDT was considered safe too for a while and very useful too.

Economists will say what is the relative value of having the plastic and having the lobsters and let us determine their relative worth. Economists stink.
not rated yet Aug 11, 2010
I am glad they did not just look at the statistics and say it was all because of global warming. That is what the statisticians would have done.

Now now, be nice to statisticians, like all things in this world there are good ones and evil ones. The difference is by how much one is getting paid. Sadly it is very true you can make statistics say anything as long as you use the proper word play, omit the proper information, or simply rig the population sample, something many corporations are quite adept at.

Sadly plastics are safe... in small amounts extended over time and when not left sitting in the hot sun for days, weeks, years leeching out deadly heat activated chemicals... If you really want to cry check out the Great Pacific Garbage Patch
not rated yet Aug 11, 2010
Economists will say what is the relative value of having the plastic and having the lobsters and let us determine their relative worth. Economists stink.
Most economists love lobster. Threaten their favorite showoff food and you may get their attention.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.