A plane that lands like a bird (w/ Video)

July 20, 2010 by Larry Hardesty
MIT researchers from the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory have developed a control system that lets a foam glider land on a perch like a pet parakeet. Photo: Jason Dorfman/CSAIL

Everyone knows what it's like for an airplane to land: the slow maneuvering into an approach pattern, the long descent, and the brakes slamming on as soon as the plane touches down, which seems to just barely bring it to a rest a mile later. Birds, however, can switch from barreling forward at full speed to lightly touching down on a target as narrow as a telephone wire. Why can't an airplane be more like a bird?

MIT researchers have demonstrated a new control system that allows a foam glider with only a single motor on its tail to land on a perch, just like a pet parakeet. The work could have important implications for the design of robotic planes, greatly improving their and potentially allowing them to recharge their batteries simply by alighting on power lines.

Birds can land so precisely because they take advantage of a complicated physical phenomenon called "stall." Even when a commercial airplane is changing altitude or banking, its wings are never more than a few degrees away from level. Within that narrow range of angles, the airflow over the plane's wings is smooth and regular, like the flow of water around a small, smooth stone in a creek bed.

A bird approaching its perch, however, will tilt its wings back at a much sharper angle. The airflow over the wings becomes turbulent, and large vortices — whirlwinds — form behind the wings. The effects of the vortices are hard to predict: If a plane tilts its wings back too far, it can fall out of the sky. Hence the name "stall."

The smooth over the wings of a normally operating plane is well-understood mathematically; as a consequence, engineers are highly confident that a commercial airliner will respond to the pilot's commands as intended. But stall is a much more complicated phenomenon: Even the best descriptions of it are time-consuming to compute.

Reap the whirlwind

To design their control system, MIT Associate Professor Russ Tedrake, a member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and Rick Cory, a PhD student in Tedrake's lab who defended his dissertation this spring, first developed their own mathematical model of a glider in stall. For a range of launch conditions, they used the model to calculate sequences of instructions intended to guide the glider to its perch. "It gets this nominal trajectory," Cory explains. "It says, 'If this is a perfect model, this is how it should fly.'" But, he adds, "because the model is not perfect, if you play out that same solution, it completely misses."

So Cory and Tedrake also developed a set of error-correction controls that could nudge the glider back onto its trajectory when location sensors determined that it had deviated from it. By using innovative techniques developed at MIT's Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, they were able to precisely calculate the degree of deviation that the controls could compensate for. The addition of the error-correction controls makes a trajectory look like a tube snaking through space: The center of the tube is the trajectory calculated using Cory and Tedrake's model; the radius of the tube describes the tolerance of the error-correction controls.

The control system ends up being, effectively, a bunch of tubes pressed together like a fistful of straws. If the glider goes so far off course that it leaves one tube, it will still find itself in another. Once the glider is launched, it just keeps checking its position and executing the command that corresponds to the tube in which it finds itself.

The measure of air resistance against a body in flight is known as the "drag coefficient." A cruising plane tries to minimize its drag coefficient, but when it's trying to slow down, it tilts its wings back in order to increase drag. Ordinarily, it can't tilt back too far, for fear of stall. But because Cory and Tedrake's control system takes advantage of stall, the glider, when it's landing, has a drag coefficient that's four to five times that of other aerial vehicles.

A high-speed video of the researchers' computer-controlled glider landing on a suspended string perch.Video courtesy of Russ Tedrake and Rick Cory

From spy planes to fairies

For some time, the U.S. Air Force has been interested in the possibility of unmanned aerial vehicles that could land in confined spaces and has been funding and monitoring research in the area. "What Russ and Rick and their team is doing is unique," says Gregory Reich of the Air Force Research Laboratory. "I don't think anyone else is addressing the flight control problem in nearly as much detail." Reich points out, however, that in their experiments, Cory and Tedrake used data from wall-mounted cameras to gauge the glider's position, and the control algorithms ran on a computer on the ground, which transmitted instructions to the glider. "The computational power that you may have on board a vehicle of this size is really, really limited," Reich says. Even though the MIT researchers' course correction algorithms are simple, they may not be simple enough.

Tedrake believes, however, that computer processors powerful enough to handle his and Cory's control algorithms are only a few years off. In the meantime, his lab has already begun to address the problem of moving the glider's location sensors onboard, and although Cory will be moving to California to take a job researching advanced robotics techniques for Disney, he hopes to continue collaborating with Tedrake. "I visited the air force, and I visited Disney, and they actually have a lot in common," Cory says. "The air force wants an that can land on a power line, and Disney wants a flying Tinker Bell that can land on a lantern. But the technology's similar."

Explore further: Nonlinear thinker: Making sense of previously insoluble problems

More information: groups.csail.mit.edu/locomotion/perching.html

Related Stories

New Flying Wing Design Tested

November 10, 2005

For almost a hundred years most planes have looked like a tube with wings, but that may change thanks to NASA research. Engineers at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., are testing a design for a flying wing, ...

Recommended for you

Enhancing solar power with diatoms

October 20, 2017

Diatoms, a kind of algae that reproduces prodigiously, have been called "the jewels of the sea" for their ability to manipulate light. Now, researchers hope to harness that property to boost solar technology.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.7 / 5 (3) Jul 20, 2010
I want to see the rest of the videos. It look like it was about to fall off and crash.
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
The air force wants an airplane that can land on a power line, and Disney wants a flying Tinker Bell that can land on a lantern.

And he went for Disney. Since he's still going to work with the other guy for the plane, it's not pacifism. Am I to understand, therefore, that Disney pays better than the USAF?

This perching idea is really great but I don't see why they're so fixated on power lines for recharging. It couldn't work on the bigger Predators/Reapers, they're way too heavy, and smaller UAVs would require some sort of transformer, maybe some EM shielding, extra weight that cancels the advantage of accessible pit stops.
3 / 5 (2) Jul 20, 2010
Disney paying better then the USAF?? Nahh, he probably just likes to see kids smiling. Not that the two entities are all that different. They both want to control the world, they just have different strategies.
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
Why don't you think that an Entertainment industry would pay more than the USAF??
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
This suggests that it may be possible for a manned aircraft to 'crash'-land with minimum injury to occupants. Rather than skid to a stop on it's belly at high speed, a plane could alternatively be maneuvered to stall at a fixed location and come to rest tail-first. If airports could provide a safe 'perch' area, perhaps future craft could be remotely landed during emergency conditions. Definitely worth the research effort!
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
Apparently no one has watched Air America movie landings.
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
The USAF did this back in the 50's (if in a slightly different manner)

Ryan x-13


It was a technical achievement but not a usable.. the Kestrel/Harrier was a far better solution
1 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2010
Very interesting and highly practicable research indeed! I hope they get it working and as Nyloc suggested maybe get it to work in emergency situations.

What this does point out though is the huge difficulty one would have in evolving from say a reptile to a bird. How on earth would a reptile acquire the ability - first to take off and then secondly to land safely without killing itself in the process? How many times would flight ability have to evolve before the evolving organism got it just right without killing itself and so the whole new species go extinct before getting off the ground [and safely back again]?
Sounds rather impossible if you start thinking soberly about it - with no hand-waving allowed to brush aside the difficulties involved.
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
Well think about the more ancient birds like archeopteryx, they most likely hit the side of a tree like modern gliding mammals do. That requires a near vertical approach on landing. What's difficult to do is not the actual landing, but calculating it in a way that a computer can land itself. You know how to walk, but could you program a sufficient walking robot? Could you even list the exact timing sequence of each of your muscles in your leg? Probably not, we have very integrated sensory systems and feedback mechanisms that allow for motion by instinct rather than a set of written rules
not rated yet Jul 20, 2010
Typical anti-evolutionist nonsense, many birds do actually 'crash' but by being light you take little damage eg an ant falling from a table if a human fell from the same proportional height splat! many creatures in nature start out gliding by increasing their area eg gliding possums reptiles that lived in trees who didnt typically use their forelimbs could then have them free to develop gliding appendage. These appendages would develop over time as natural selection saved those who are 'better' at flying strengthening muscles turning them into wings etc over time. the fossil record is much more complete than it used to be and many examples show creatures at differnt stages of this process with some recent notable finds. I would suggest you give the scientists who have developed evolutionary theory enough credit to actually study the theory before you push your views, education is freedom from ignorance.
Jul 20, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Jul 21, 2010
That would only be mildly poop yourself scary the first few times....
1 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2010
The article suggests serious computing power is needed to maintain and steer this kind of flight. I beg to disagree.

Find the flying insect that has the smallest brain, and start from there. Presumably some insects have brains with vastly fewer cells than Drosophila, which seems to be the most studied insect (because it's convenient, fast breeding, etc.).
not rated yet Jul 24, 2010
"Why can't an airplane be more like a bird?" ... because it weighs several tons or more?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.