Tropical Storm Imani making a question mark in the Southern Indian Ocean

Tropical Storm Imani making a question mark in the Southern Indian Ocean
NASA's Terra satellite captured an image of Tropical Storm Imani on March 24 at 4:25 UTC, and it showed a storm with good symmetry, indicating that it is well-organized. The image even hinted of an eye forming in the storm's center. Credit: NASA MODIS Rapid Response Team

Over the last week, the path that Tropical Storm Imani, formerly tropical cyclone 21S, is making in the Southern Indian Ocean resembles a question mark. However, there is no question in the minds of forecasters that Imani is headed south to finish out the "question mark" shape.

The or MODIS instrument on NASA's captured Tropical Storm Imani at 0425 UTC (12:25 a.m. EDT) today, when it was near the "middle of the question mark" track that it is taking. It showed a storm with good symmetry, indicating that it is well-organized. The image even hinted of an eye forming in the storm's center.

At 0900 UTC (5 a.m. EDT) today, March 24, Imani had near 63 mph (55 knots). Tropical storm-force winds extended out up to 55 miles from the center, making the storm about 110 miles in diameter. It was located about 745 miles west-southwest of Cocos Island, near 15.7 south and 86.3 East. It was moving southwest near 13 mph (11 knots).

Imani has strengthened a little and poses no threat to land. It is forecast to intensify more for another day before moving into an area of increasing vertical wind shear, which will weaken it.

Citation: Tropical Storm Imani making a question mark in the Southern Indian Ocean (2010, March 24) retrieved 18 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2010-03-tropical-storm-imani-southern-indian.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

NASA's Aqua Satellite sees a tight Tropical Storm 21S

0 shares

Feedback to editors