Weak Lensing Gains Strength

January 19, 2010
Visible-light images from the Hubble Space Telescope populate this tiny section of the full two-square-degree Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS), which combines data in many wavelengths from space and ground-based telescopes around the world. COSMOS was the basis of a new extension of the mass-luminosity relation for weak lensing studies.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Berkeley Lab cosmologists were part of an international team that has extended the relationship between the x-ray luminosity and the mass of galaxy clusters as measured by gravitational lensing, improving the reliability of mass measurements of much older, more distant, and smaller galactic structures. These refined measurements will benefit both the understanding of dark matter and the nature of dark energy as well.

Weak is a uniquely promising way to learn how much there is in the and how its distribution has evolved since the distant past. New work by a team led by a cosmologist from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has made major progress in extending the use of gravitational lensing to the study of much older and smaller structures than was previously possible.

Until recently, weak lensing had been limited to calculating the total mass of relatively nearby groups and clusters of galaxies. Their total mass includes both ordinary, like stars and dust - what astronomers call “baryonic” matter - plus the much more massive invisible concentrations of dark matter that form groups and clusters by pulling galaxies together.

Astronomers were able to establish an important scaling relationship for nearby clusters between their total masses, determined by gravitational lensing, and the brightness of their x-ray emissions, an indication of the mass of the ordinary matter alone. A new study in the (ApJ) now continues this important relationship to distant objects.

“We’ve been able to extend measurements of mass to much smaller structures, which existed much earlier in the history of the Universe,” says Alexie Leauthaud, a Chamberlain Fellow in Berkeley Lab’s Physics Division and first author of the ApJ study. “This helps us gain a better understanding of the relationship between the normal matter in dense structures, which are seen through the x-ray luminosity, and the total dark-matter mass of these structures, as measured by the weak lensing.” Leauthaud is a member of the Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics (BCCP) at UC Berkeley and Berkeley Lab.

A spectacular example of strong gravitational lensing is the nearby galaxy cluster Abell 2218 (top), in which the visible distortion of individual background galaxies can be used to measure the mass of the lensing structure. The weak lensing of fainter and more distant structures must be detected by statistical averaging (bottom). (Abell 2218 image by NASA, weak lensing simulation by Bhuvnesh Jain, Uroš Seljak, and Simon White)

Mass as a lens

Gravitational lensing occurs because mass curves the space around it, bending the paths along which rays of light travel: the more mass (and the closer to the center of mass), the more space bends, and the more the image of a distant object is displaced and distorted. Thus measuring distortion, or “shear,” is key to measuring the mass of the lensing object.

At least this is so for “strong” lensing. A very massive object or collection of objects, like a nearby galaxy cluster and the invisible dark matter that encloses it, distorts the apparent shape and position of bright objects beyond it so much that the distant images are bent and may even be smeared into rings around the foreground cluster. The visible distortion is a direct measure of the mass of the lens and points to its center.

Weak lensing works the same way, except that the shear is too subtle to be seen directly. Most of the apparent shear isn’t distortion at all - a galaxy has its own distinct shape, and we often see it from an angle that makes it look elongated. Apparent shear may also be due to the telescope, the detector, or the atmosphere.

Nevertheless, faint additional distortions in a collection of distant galaxies can be calculated statistically, and the average shear due to the lensing of some massive object in front of them can be computed. Yet to calculate the lens’s mass from average shear, one needs to know its center.

“The problem with low-mass, high-redshift clusters is that it is difficult to determine which exact galaxy lies at the center of the cluster,” says Leauthaud. “That’s where x-rays help. The x-ray luminosity from a galaxy cluster can be used to find its center very accurately.”

The hot intracluster medium of gas or plasma that fills almost all galaxy clusters emits x-rays, making x-ray emission a convenient way to find distant galaxy structures in the night sky. But how does this emission help find the center of mass in a galaxy cluster? For the same reason that dark matter is dark.

Visible matter follows an underlying dark matter scaffolding. At left, blue indicates the mass of stars in galaxies in a given area, yellow the number of galaxies, and red the sources of brightest x-ray emission. Contours at right are the distribution of dark matter, from gravitational lensing. (Richard Massey et al, Nature 2007. Click on image for best resolution.)

Why dark matter is dark

Except through gravitation, dark matter does not interact (or interacts only very weakly) with itself or with ordinary matter. Indeed, that’s why it’s dark: to emit light it would have to interact via the electromagnetic force.

With ordinary matter, electromagnetism affects everything from chemistry to luminosity to electric and magnetic fields and even the pressure of stellar winds; thus electromagnetism plays an important role in determining the arrangement of ordinary matter, which is often irregular.

Because electromagnetism plays no role in the distribution of dark matter, however, dark matter forms large, smooth, spherical clumps, usually filled by ordinary galaxies plus hot gas or plasma, which it has trapped and retained solely through gravitation.

“Gas density follows the dark matter density, and because x-ray emission scales as the square of the gas density, the x-ray light shines very strongly in the core of the structure,” Leauthaud explains. “So x-rays are an excellent way to determine the center of even a distant, fuzzy .”

“Basically the more mass, the more heat,” says Jean-Paul Kneib, a lead author of the ApJ paper from the Laboratory of Astrophysics of Marseilles (LAM) and France’s National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS). “But the plasma is baryonic matter, which is only a small part of the total mass of the cluster. While the x-radiation tells you something about the total mass, you need to get the scaling just right.”

To pin down the scaling relation between x-ray brightness and total mass, Leauthaud and her colleagues first used x-ray luminosity to identify the center of mass of 206 galaxy groups and clusters, including numerous faint, distant clusters listed in the Hubble Space Telescope’s Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS), which is curated by Nick Scoville of the California Institute of Technology, an author of the ApJ paper.

X-ray imaging came from the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton satellite and from NASA’s Chandra satellite, whose principal investigator is Martin Elvis of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, an author of the ApJ paper. Elvis says, “I never thought our Chandra data would enable such a great measurement. In fact I was astonished when Alexie first showed me the results. It’s quite a tour de force of analysis, and really convincing.”

The X-ray analysis itself was performed by Alexis Finoguenov of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics and the University of Maryland, one of the paper’s lead authors. Knowing the centers of mass from analysis of x-ray emission, the researchers could now use weak lensing to estimate the total mass of the distant groups and clusters with greater accuracy than ever before.

Finally they calculated the mass-luminosity relation for the new collections of groups and clusters and found that it was consistent with previous relations established by surveys of much closer structures - including some studied with strong gravitational lensing. Within calculable uncertainty, the relation follows the same straight slope from nearby galaxy clusters to distant ones; a simple, consistent scaling factor relates a group or cluster’s total mass to its x-ray brightness, or “baryonic tracer.”

“By confirming the mass-luminosity relation and extending it to high redshifts,” Leauthaud says, “we have taken a small step in the right direction toward using weak lensing as a powerful tool to measure the evolution of structure.”

Dark matter shapes visible matter in a way that reflects the nature of dark energy. How galaxies are distributed in a Universe with no dark energy (left) would differ measurably from one in which dark energy is significant (right).

In the beginning

The origin of galaxies can be traced back to slight differences in the density of the hot, liquid-like early universe; traces of these differences can still be seen as minute temperature differences in the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

“The variations we observe in the ancient microwave sky represent the imprints that developed over time into the cosmic dark-matter scaffolding for the galaxies we see today,” says BCCP director and UC Berkeley physics professor George Smoot of Berkeley Lab’s Physics Division, who shared the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics for measuring anisotropies in the CMB and is one of the authors of the ApJ paper. “It is very exciting that we can actually measure with gravitational lensing how the dark matter has collapsed and evolved since the beginning.”

One goal in studying the evolution of structure is to understand dark matter itself, and how it interacts with the ordinary matter we can see. Another goal is to learn more about dark energy, the mysterious something that is pushing matter apart and causing the Universe to expand at an accelerating rate. Is dark energy constant, or is it dynamic? Or is it unreal, merely an illusion caused by a limitation in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity?

The tools provided by the extended mass-luminosity relationship will do much to answer these questions about the opposing roles of gravity and dark energy in the once and future shape of the Universe.

Explore further: Astronomers Gravitate Toward Einstein's Telescope

More information: “A Weak Lensing Study of X-Ray Groups in the COSMOS Survey: Form and Evolution of the Mass-Luminosity Relation,” by Alexie Leauthaud, et al., appears in the Astrophysical Journal and is available online to subscribers.

-- More about the COSMOS survey

Related Stories

Team Shines Cosmic Light on Missing Ordinary Matter

January 7, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- An international team of scientists, led by University of Maryland astronomer Stacy McGaugh, has found that individual galactic objects have less ordinary matter, relative to dark matter, than does the Universe ...

Massive galaxy cluster found 10 billion light years away

June 6, 2006

A University of Sussex astronomer is the lead researcher for a project that has led to the discovery of the most distant cluster of galaxies observed to date. The cluster, which is 10 billion light years from Earth, is also ...

XMM-Newton digs into the secrets of fossil galaxy clusters

April 27, 2006

Taking advantage of the high sensitivity of ESA's XMM-Newton and the sharp vision of NASA's Chandra X-Ray space observatories, astronomers have studied the behaviour of massive fossil galaxy clusters, trying to find out how ...

XMM-Newton spots the greatest of great balls of fire

June 12, 2006

Thanks to data from ESA's XMM-Newton X-ray satellite, a team of international scientists found a comet-like ball of gas over a thousand million times the mass of the sun hurling through a distant galaxy cluster over 750 kilometres ...

Recommended for you

Solar eruptions could electrify Martian moons

October 18, 2017

Powerful solar eruptions could electrically charge areas of the Martian moon Phobos to hundreds of volts, presenting a complex electrical environment that could possibly affect sensitive electronics carried by future robotic ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2010
Gravitational lensing occurs because mass curves the space around it, bending the paths along which rays of light travel: the more mass (and the closer to the center of mass), the more space bends, and the more the image of a distant object is displaced and distorted. Thus measuring distortion, or “shear,” is key to measuring the mass of the lensing object.

I am reading up on quantum theory at present just to get with the times. This leads me to consider that space is not bent by mass at all. If anything happens, then the measure of the Planck must be different along the axis towards mass.

This would have the same effect visually but would be easier to understand and plot mathematically.

If we can accurately measure the Planck length we need to measure it while taking mass into account at the same time.

The Planck should be shorter as it approaches a mass and longer the further away from a mass it gets.
1 / 5 (1) Jan 19, 2010
I would probably be more convinced by an experiment on earth that showed that effect, that gravity bends light..

Otherwise I would say that only magnetism can affect light(EM wave).

3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2010
Following from my earlier comment about a change in the value of the Planck length in the direction of mass, it would automatically follow that Plank length would be longer further from gravity. Since Space itself would be made up unique Planck units it would also follow that space itself would get larger as mass separated from other mass.

This would mean that as two massive bodies traveled in opposite directions the amount of space between those bodies would increase at a rate greater than their combined initial velocities. This would be an explanation for expansion of universe?

Not sure about the above paragraph though because even if Planck length changes the length will be whatever we define it as. Therefore the number of Plancks between two objects traveling in opposite direction would be sum of combined velocity.
3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2010
If only it were as easy as randomly hypothesizing about things on a forum that you dont understand. If you were to count all the "great" ideas postulated on here, I think the ratio would match closely with the proportion of society who is "mentally incapacitated"
3.5 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2010
I would probably be more convinced by an experiment on earth that showed that effect, that gravity bends light..

Otherwise I would say that only magnetism can affect light(EM wave).

Your joking right? I surely hope so
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010
I want to know about the gravity-lensing by an edge-on galaxy. Does anyone have the data?
5 / 5 (1) Jan 20, 2010
@ iFujita,

The type of lensing you describe is usually referred to as galaxy-galaxy lensing (as opposed to strong/weak lensing in galaxy clusters described above). Examples of lensing edge-on galaxies are pretty rare. Same with published work on said systems. I came across a couple of candidate edge-on galaxies from the Strong Lens COSMOS site:



I don't think these examples have been followed up but might help get your search started. The 'links' page at the site has links to some relevant papers on these objects.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 20, 2010
Forgot to mention, B1600+434 is a double-image quasar lensed by a nearly edge-on galaxy. NICMOS observations of this rare system can be found here: http://arxiv.org/...07v2.pdf .

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.