Science fraud: Journal urges China to show 'integrity'

January 7, 2010

Leading medical journal The Lancet on Friday urged China to tighten measures against scientific fraud after dozens of papers written by two teams of Chinese chemists were found to be faked.

"For (President) Hu Jintao's goal of China becoming a research superpower by 2020 to be credible, China must assume stronger leadership in scientific integrity," the British weekly warned.

"China's government needs to take this episode as a cue to reinvigorate standards for teaching research ethics and for the conduct of the research itself, as well as establishing robust and transparent procedures for handling allegations of to prevent further instances of fraud."

The call came after a specialist journal called Acta Crystallographica Section E uncovered extensive fraud in Chinese-authored papers that were published in 2007.

The studies purported to announce the invention of at least 70 structures in crystallography, or the study of the arrangement of atoms in solids. Crystallography is a key tool in materials science.

In an article dated December 19 on its website, Acta Crystollographica Section E said the entailed taking bona-fide structures that had already been invented and changing one or two atoms to make the compound seem new.

The con had been belatedly spotted thanks to a computer programme that compares molecular structures, its editors said.

Two groups, one led by Hua Zhong and the other by Tao Liu, both of Jinggangshan University, Jian, in the eastern province of Jiangsu, are incriminated, it said.

Zhong's group has retracted 41 papers, and Liu's group 29, according to the journal, which says the tally of 70 frauds "is likely" to rise further.

The publication is open-access, meaning it is available for free on the Internet. The journal charges authors 150 dollars to print their papers, a fee that it says helps meet the costs of journal production and a "detailed and exhaustive ."

Peer review -- assessment of data by independent scientists of high standing -- is the traditional cornerstone of excellence in science publishing.

But a string of scandals over the last half-dozen years has caused the system to be closely questioned.

In the most notorious case, South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-Suk hoodwinked the prestigious US journal Science in 2004 and 2005 with claims that he had created the world's first stem-cell line from a cloned human embryo and developed 11 patient-specific embryonic stem-cell lines.

The claims raised hopes of new treatments for diseases such as cancer, diabetes and Parkinson's.

Disgraced when the fraud was unmasked, Hwang was sentenced last October to a two-year suspended prison term for embezzlement of research funds and ethical breaches.

Chinese scientists have become prolific publishers, accounting for 11.5 percent of the 271,000 papers that graced science journals in 2008, according to monitoring organisations.

Acta Crystallographica Section E is published by the International Union of Crystallography, headquartered in the northern English town of Chester.

Explore further: Hwang scandal hurt Korean scientists

Related Stories

Hwang scandal hurt Korean scientists

February 21, 2007

South Korean officials say the journal Science is avoiding articles by Korean scientists because of disgraced cloning researcher Hwang Woo-suk.

Science retracts cloning articles

January 13, 2006

The journal Science has retracted two articles by discredited South Korean scientist who claimed production of a stem-cell line from a cloned human embryo.

SKorea seeks jail for disgraced cloning scientist

August 24, 2009

(AP) -- Prosecutors demanded a four-year prison term Monday for a South Korean scientist disgraced in a cloning scandal that shook the international scientific community and led to his trial on fraud and other charges.

Disgraced cloning expert convicted in South Korea (Update)

October 26, 2009

(AP) -- A South Korean stem cell scientist once hailed as a hero for bringing hope to people with incurable diseases and creating the world's first cloned dog was convicted Monday on criminal charges related to faked research, ...

No stem-cell misconduct by Pa. researcher

February 10, 2006

A University of Pittsburgh panel has ruled that a biologist committed no scientific misconduct involving fraudulent South Korean cloning research.

South Korean cloning expert: I was set up

January 16, 2006

South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk, who has admitted falsifying published stem cell and cloning research, reportedly says he was betrayed by colleagues.

Recommended for you

Humans in America '115,000 years earlier than thought'

April 26, 2017

High-tech dating of mastodon remains found in southern California has shattered the timeline of human migration to America, pushing the presence of hominins back to 130,000 years ago rather than just 15,000 years, researchers ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Jan 07, 2010
Peer review -- assessment of data by independent scientists of high standing -- is the traditional cornerstone of excellence in science publishing.
But a string of scandals over the last half-dozen years has caused the system to be closely questioned.
In the most notorious case,Global Warming was claimed to be man made without any substantiating evidence by researchers from the UK, US Canada and the rest of the world.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.