Toy recall of 2007 hurt innocent companies, shows research

December 2, 2009 By Ken McGuffin

( -- The well-publicized toy recalls of 2007 took potentially harmful toys off the shelves and affected the companies that made them.

But a new study also shows that even companies not targeted by the recalls got hurt in the resulting consumer backlash, sometimes worse than the offenders. Meanwhile offending companies did not generally see other product categories affected.

In 2007, the U.S. recalled 276 toys and other children's products - more than an 80% increase over the previous year. Almost all of the recalls involved toys made in China and many involved paint with elevated levels of lead.

The study looked at the effects that the recalls had on sales of Infant and Preschool toys during the subsequent Christmas season. The authors found that Christmas sales for similar products by manufacturers named in the recalls were down by about 30% compared to other products that these manufacturers sold. But, these manufacturers' sales of toys that were sufficiently dissimilar to those named in the recalls did not seem to be affected. In other words, consumers did not "punish" offending manufacturer more generally.

"This may be because, in this industry, consumers do not recognize manufacturers as well as they recognize brands and trademarks. For example, consumers may identify brands such as Barbie and Hot Wheels without recognizing that both of these are, in fact, made by Mattel," says Mara Lederman a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management and one of three study co-authors

Perhaps most interestingly, the study finds that companies who did not have any recalls got hit too - their 2007 Christmas season sales were down about 25% compared to 2005. This suggests that these recalls influenced consumers' expectations of toy safety, in general.

"In this industry, one firm's offence seems to penalize other players," says Lederman. "This may be happening because the recalls involved a common practice ( in China) or because brands and trademarks are commonly shared across different manufacturers and . One implication of this is that companies may have an interest in enforcing stricter industry-wide standards."

The paper received financial support from the AIC Institute for Corporate Citizenship at the Rotman School of Management.

The complete study is available at: .

Provided by University of Toronto (news : web)

Explore further: Study describes what companies should do to recover from a product recall

Related Stories

Toys recalled because of lead paint

November 8, 2007

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the recall of six Chinese-manufactured toys because of excessive levels of lead.

Kitchen toys recalled for choking hazard

November 6, 2007

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a voluntary recall of Laugh & Learn Kitchen Toys because of a potential choking hazard.

Study finds many consumers ignore food product recalls

April 14, 2009

Rutgers' Food Policy Institute (FPI) released a study today showing that many Americans fail to check their homes for recalled food products. Only about 60 percent of the studied sample reported ever having looked for recalled ...

Toward improving the safety of Lithium-ion batteries

December 17, 2007

After recalls and fires involving Lithium-ion batteries, battery manufacturers and scientists have launched an intensive effort to improve the safety of these rechargeable power packs found in dozens of consumer electronics ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.