Great Barrier Reef under serious threat: report

September 2, 2009
This file photo shows the 345,000-square-kilometre Great Barrier Reef which runs along the northeastern coast of Australia. Australia's Great Barrier Reef is in serious jeopardy as global warming and chemical runoff threaten to kill marine species and cause serious outbreaks of disease, a report warned.

Australia's Great Barrier Reef is in serious jeopardy as global warming and chemical runoff threaten to kill marine species and cause serious outbreaks of disease, a report warned Wednesday.

The World Heritage-listed reef was already showing the impacts of , with two episodes of mass coral bleaching in the past 10 years, the Marine Park Authority's inaugural reef outlook report said.

"While populations of almost all are intact and there are no records of extinctions, some ecologically important species, such as dugongs, marine turtles, seabirds, black teatfish and some sharks, have declined significantly," the authority wrote.

Coral disease, outbreaks of toxic blue-green algae and infestation by pestilent species such as the crown-of-thorns starfish appeared to be becoming more frequent and more serious, it added.

The 345,000-square-kilometre (133,000-square-mile) attraction had deteriorated significantly since European settlement in 1788 and was at a "crossroads", the report warned.

"Almost all the biodiversity of the will be affected by climate change, with coral reef habitats the most vulnerable," the report said.

"Coral bleaching resulting from increasing and lower rates of calcification in skeleton-building organisms such as corals because of , are the effects of most concern and are already evident."

The runoff of nitrogen-based pesticides from local farming areas was a particular concern, the report said, adding that their impact remained "largely unknown".

Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the report showed strong decisive action needed to be taken, and pledged to halve agricultural runoff by 2013 and to reduce sediment loads by 20 percent by 2020.

"Improving the quality of water flowing into the reef is one of the most important things we can do to help the reef withstand the impacts of climate change," Garrett said.

Australia's centre-left government has already pledged 52 million dollars (42 million US) to improve water quality on the reef.

It has also agreed to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 25 percent of 2000 levels by 2020 if world leaders sign up to an ambitious reduction goal in Copenhagen in December.

Without an agreement, Australia's target will remain unchanged at five percent.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: Scientists to unlock Great Barrier Reef genome

Related Stories

Scientists to unlock Great Barrier Reef genome

July 30, 2009

Australian scientists on Thursday announced a ground-breaking genome-mapping project that could help the Great Barrier Reef fight off the twin threats of climate change and toxic farm chemicals.

Larry's cool change good for reef

March 22, 2006

Cyclone Larry has been a nightmare on land but underwater, it may have helped save the Great Barrier Reef from disaster. University of Queensland coral reef expert Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg said Larry's wind had cooled ...

Reef 'at risk in climate change'

April 6, 2007

Australian scientists who contributed to the latest global greenhouse study say the Great Barrier Reef is one of the nation's great assets most at risk under climate change.

Reef boom beats doom

April 21, 2009

( -- Marine scientists say they are astonished at the spectacular recovery of certain coral reefs in Australia's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park from a devastating coral bleaching event in 2006.

Recommended for you

New Amazon threat? Deforestation from mining

October 18, 2017

Sprawling mining operations in Brazil are destroying much more of the iconic Amazon forest than previously thought, says the first comprehensive study of mining deforestation in the world's largest tropical rainforest.

Scientists determine source of world's largest mud eruption

October 17, 2017

On May 29, 2006, mud started erupting from several sites on the Indonesian island of Java. Boiling mud, water, rocks and gas poured from newly-created vents in the ground, burying entire towns and compelling many Indonesians ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 06, 2009
They are on the right track as far as cutting agricultural chemical run-off. They are not on track for reducing CO2 emissions. Corals thrived in oceans when the CO2 levels were in the 1000s ppm. Why should we expect that they will bleach out and die with our pitifully low CO2 levels today?

Besides, there is another problem looming on the horizon for mankind's descendants in somewhere between a million and a billion years. If our CO2 levels are not high enough (meaning twice as much as now in the atmosphere) by that time, the Sun will blast the oceans into space and all life as we know it will die and smolder under a Sun with a 30% higher radiative force!

Increasing CO2 levels is the easiest way to prevent that fate and it does not add cost to what we already are doing.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.