Particle physics study finds new data for extra Z-bosons and potential fifth force of nature

April 28, 2009

The Large Hadron Collider is an enormous particle accelerator whose 17-mile tunnel straddles the borders of France and Switzerland. A group of physicists at the University of Nevada, Reno has analyzed data from the accelerator that could ultimately prove or disprove the possibility of a fifth force of nature.

As the largest science instrument ever built, the LHC has the science community buzzing with excitement as it may help in understanding the inner workings of Nature.

Remarkably, some of the new physics that may be studied at this $6 billion facility can be probed using low-cost experiments fitting in a typical laboratory room.

In a forthcoming Physical Review Letter article, the University of Nevada, Reno physicists are reporting an analysis of an experiment on violation of mirror symmetry in atoms. Their refined analysis sets new limits on a hypothesized particle, the extra Z-boson, carving out the lower-energy part of the discovery reach of the LHC.

Andrei Derevianko, an associate professor in the College of Science's Department of Physics, who has conducted groundbreaking research to improve the time-telling capabilities of the world's most accurate , is one of the principals behind what is believed to be the most accurate to-date low-energy determination of the strength of the electroweak coupling between atomic electrons and quarks of the nucleus.

Derevianko and his colleagues have determined the coupling strength by combining previous measurements made by Dr. Carl Wieman, a Nobel laureate in physics, with high-precision calculations in a cesium atom.

The original work by Wieman used a table-top apparatus at the University of Colorado in Boulder, Colo. The Boulder team monitored a "twinge" of weak in atoms, which are otherwise governed by the electromagnetic force. The Standard Model of elementary particles, developed in the early 1970s, holds that heavy particles, called Z-bosons, carry this weak force. In contrast to the electromagnetic force, the weak force violates mirror symmetry: an atom and its mirror image behave differently. This is known to physicists as "parity violation."

The Boulder group's experiment opened the door to new inquiry, according to Derevianko.

"It pointed out a discrepancy, and hinted at a possibility for new physics, in particular, extra Z-bosons," he said.

Interpretation of the Boulder experiment requires theoretical input. The analysis requires detailed understanding of the correlated motion of 55 electrons of cesium atom. This is not an easy task as the number of memory units required for storing full quantum-mechanical wavefunctions exceeds the estimated number of atoms in the Universe. Special computational tools and approximations were developed. Compared to previous analyses, reaching the next level of accuracy required a factor of 1,000 increase in computational complexity.

The paper represents a dramatic improvement as researchers have struggled to develop a more precise test of the Standard Model. Derevianko's group, which included Dr. S. Porsev and a number of students, has worked on the analysis of the Boulder experiment for the past eight years.

"Finally, the computer technology caught up with the number-crunching demands of the problem and we were able to attack the problem," says Derevianko. "I have greatly benefited from collaborations in this complex problem. A fellow co-author, Kyle Beloy, for example, has recently been recognized as an Outstanding Graduate Researcher by the University."

In contrast to previous, less accurate interpretations of the Boulder experiment, Derevianko's group has found a perfect agreement with the prediction of the Standard Model. This agreement holds important implications for particle physics.

"Atomic parity violation places powerful constraints on new physics beyond the Standard Model of elementary particles," Derevianko said. "With this new-found precision, we are doing a better job of 'listening' to the atoms."

By refining and improving the computations, Derevianko said there is potential for a better understanding of hypothetical particles (extra Z-bosons) which could be carriers of a so-far elusive fifth force of nature. For years, physics researchers have grappled with experiments to prove or disprove the possibility of a fifth force of Nature.

There are four known fundamental forces of Nature. In addition to gravity, electromagnetism creates light, radio waves and other forms of radiation. Two other forces operate only on an atomic level: These are the strong force, which binds particles in the nucleus, and the weak force, which reveals itself when atoms break down in radioactive decay, or as in the Boulder experiment, through the parity violation.

The possibility of a fifth force could dispute the long-held belief that the force of gravity is the same for all substances.

"New physics beyond the is the next frontier," Derevianko said, "and it's the theoretical motivation for much of this research."

More information: To read Derevianko's paper, go to:

Source: University of Nevada, Reno

Explore further: Physicists propose new method of measuring the weak interaction

Related Stories

Scientists make atomic clock breakthrough

October 13, 2006

University of Nevada, Reno researchers Andrei Derevianko, Kyle Beloy, and Ulyana Safronova sat down six months ago and began work on a calculation that will help the world keep better time.

New particles get a mass boost

October 1, 2007

A sophisticated, new analysis has revealed that the next frontier in particle physics is farther away than once thought. New forms of matter not predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics are most likely twice as ...

A 'New Dimension' at the LHC

July 22, 2008

( -- Later this year, the world's largest and most powerful particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland, will begin operating, sending beams of protons hurling around circular tracks ...

Recommended for you

Walking crystals may lead to new field of crystal robotics

February 23, 2018

Researchers have demonstrated that tiny micrometer-sized crystals—just barely visible to the human eye—can "walk" inchworm-style across the slide of a microscope. Other crystals are capable of different modes of locomotion ...

Researchers turn light upside down

February 23, 2018

Researchers from CIC nanoGUNE (San Sebastian, Spain) and collaborators have reported in Science the development of a so-called hyperbolic metasurface on which light propagates with completely reshaped wafefronts. This scientific ...

Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system

February 23, 2018

It is one of the most astonishing results of physics—when a complex system is left alone, it will return to its initial state with almost perfect precision. Gas particles, for example, chaotically swirling around in a container, ...

Seeing nanoscale details in mammalian cells

February 23, 2018

In 2014, W. E. Moerner, the Harry S. Mosher Professor of Chemistry at Stanford University, won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for co-developing a way of imaging shapes inside cells at very high resolution, called super-resolution ...

Hauling antiprotons around in a van

February 22, 2018

A team of researchers working on the antiProton Unstable Matter Annihilation (PUMA) project near CERN's particle laboratory, according to a report in Nature, plans to capture a billion antiprotons, put them in a shipping ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.5 / 5 (8) Apr 28, 2009
This is interesting.

The authors report on page 4 that "our work confirms the predicted running of the electroweak interaction over an energy range spanning four orders of magnitude" (from about 10 MeV to about 100 GeV)

Are their findings consistent with a recent suggestion that repulsive forces between neutrons contribute to high energy cosmic events [Journal of Fusion Energy 25(2006) 107-114; DOI: 10.1007/s10894-006-9009-6 http://xxx.lanl.g...0511051?

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel

2.4 / 5 (5) Apr 28, 2009
How many forces (not to mention particles) can they fit into the Standard Model?
2 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2009
It would indeed be tragic if the LHC was eclipsed by cheap experiments done in a small lab.
D0 keeps cranking up their energy and producing new results.
Either way if they don't get LHC up and running soon it could be very embarassing for them.
2.9 / 5 (7) Apr 28, 2009
Why is everybody ignoring the 600 lb gorilla in the physics lab...The big Texas hole that was supposed to put the US in the particle physics lead and was killed in the mid-1990's for political reasons.

To the President and political party who presided over the death of American Particle Physics in 1996: "Shame on you. How can you ever hold your head up in public?" Now our American Physcists have to go to Europe, hat in humble hand, and beg for time on a finicky machine.
5 / 5 (4) Apr 28, 2009

Forgive me but why would that be humiliation for Americans to go to Europe and participate in their experiments? Did you know that the US also paid for LHC? NASA, for example, employs many scientists from other nations and I see no evil in that.
Science is beyond frontiers and I think that is wonderful when scientists from all over the world get together to investigate Nature.
1 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2009
Yea UNR! Representing!

Anway, I think we should probably start building modern accelerators here in the states. It doesn't matter much right now, since we can easily access all the data from the LHC anyway. But in the future, who knows? Switzerland could participate in a war for the first time ever, the LHC could be irreprably damaged due to mscalculation, or the lab could be converted into a wathmakjg factory for political reasons. In anycase, we should try not to rely entirly on foreign labs for empirical data. There are too many unconteolqble variables.
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
Don't worry, theo, the LHC crosses the border, so even if one side goes to war, the other side can simply position their quantum black holes strategically at each end of the now u-shaped track, so as to bend the trajectories of the protons around for the next pass through the newly chrsitened "LHC/2".

As for a fifth fundamental force. This might be a dumb question, but does having an odd number of forces violate any symmetry models?
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
Although U.S. scientists and universities are participating heavily in LHC projects, the U.S. only has "Observer" status with CERN...and no voting rights.
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
It's not control over the facilities that's the problem. Data is dara no matter who flips the on switch. What we need to do is guarantee a flow of data. The best way to make sure our data flow isn't pinched off is to have our own research facilities and preferably to support research facilities in as many other countries as possible. Instead of having one egg in one basket, we should have fifty eggs spread in many baskets.
not rated yet Apr 30, 2009 many forces (not to mention particles) can they fit into the Standard Model..
Alot, because Standard Model isn't fixed theory defined by its postulate set. It's in fact represented by a mainstream of theorists, who don't believe in any particular quantum field theory, like string theory or LQG theory and who adhere to standard gauge theory of SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) gauge group, which was proven experimentally for the case of electroweak and strong interaction.
not rated yet May 01, 2009
Parity violation is not a problem, but actually predicted, in models were elementary particles are (i.) chiral and (ii.) particles and antiparticles are defined by opposite chiralities.

One such model is described at
1 / 5 (2) May 02, 2009
A fifth force has been experimentally demonstrated. Hyperbolic Free Electrons exhibit negative gravitational properties. Problem is the explanations do not fit into the Standard Model or QM. So the current crop of brainwashed physicists are desperately trying to wrap the results around existing theory and patting themselves on the back with pseudo outstanding awards to obtain grants.
not rated yet May 05, 2009
It might be interesting if the next large accelerator were built in space, perhaps a circle around the moon....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.