Mystery of infamous 'New England Dark Day' solved by 3 rings

June 7, 2008

At noon, it was black as night. It was May 19, 1780 and some people in New England thought judgment day was at hand. Accounts of that day, which became known as 'New England's Dark Day,' include mentions of midday meals by candlelight, night birds coming out to sing, flowers folding their petals,and strange behavior from animals. The mystery of this day has been solved by researchers at the University of Missouri who say evidence from tree rings reveals massive wildfires as the likely cause, one of several theories proposed after the event, but dismissed as 'simple and absurd.'

"The patterns in tree rings tell a story," said Erin McMurry, research assistant in the MU College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources Tree Ring Laboratory. "We think of tree rings as ecological artifacts. We know how to date the rings and create a chronology, so we can tell when there has been a fire or a drought occurred and unlock the history the tree has been holding for years."

Limited ability for long-distance communication prevented colonists from knowing the cause of the darkness. It was dark in Maine and along the southern coast of New England with the greatest intensity occurring in northeast Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire and southwest Maine. In the midst of the Revolutionary War, Gen. George Washington noted the dark day in his diary while he was in New Jersey.

Nearly 230 years later, MU researchers combined written accounts and fire scar evidence to determine that the dark day was caused by massive wildfires burning in Canada.

"A fire comes along and heat goes through the bark, killing the living tissue. A couple of years later, the bark falls off revealing the wood and an injury to the tree. When looking at the rings, you see charcoal formation on the outside and a resin formation on the top that creates a dark spot," said Richard Guyette, director of the Tree Ring Lab and research associate professor of forestry in the MU School of Natural Resources.

The researchers studied tree rings from the Algonquin Highlands of southern Ontario and many other locations. They found that a major fire had burned in 1780 affecting atmospheric conditions hundred of miles away. Large smoke columns were created and carried into the upper atmosphere.

"This study was a unique opportunity to take historical accounts and combine them with modern technology and the physical historical evidence from the tree rings and solve a mystery with science," McMurry said.

The study – "Fire Scars Reveal Source of New England's 1780 Dark Day" – was published in the International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Source: University of Missouri-Columbia

Explore further: Geologists uncover Antarctica's fossil forests

Related Stories

Geologists uncover Antarctica's fossil forests

November 9, 2017

During Antarctica's summer, from late November through January, UW-Milwaukee geologists Erik Gulbranson and John Isbell climbed the McIntyre Promontory's frozen slopes in the Transantarctic Mountains. High above the ice fields, ...

Galaxy-gazing telescope sensors pass important vision tests

April 28, 2015

When you're building a massive telescope designed to detect subtle shapes in the light emitted by distant galaxies, you'd like to know that the shapes you are seeing are accurate and not the result of defects in your telescope's ...

Recommended for you

Scientists dispute missing dryland forests

November 21, 2017

Scientists are disputing the possibility that a significant portion of the world's forests have been missed in an earlier accounting of ecological diversity.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Jun 08, 2008
In the US an average 4.3 million acres are burned each year. This remains largely unchanged, despite efforts at fire suppression. This makes me wonder how much wildfires contribute to our total carbon footprint.
1 / 5 (3) Jun 08, 2008
I'm already sick of the saying "carbon footprint." Can we have a new paradigm? Come on, someone think out of the box. We need a new drug.
1 / 5 (3) Jun 08, 2008
Well, in essence, a carbon footprint is how much money you send to green organizations. So, I guess you could call it something like "Consumer Guilt Offsets"

A fire that darkens the skies of an entire state is consequential. I suspect that wildfires contribute at least as much CO2 to the atmosphere annually as do human activities.
not rated yet Jun 09, 2008
I think the title of this article should be changed.
It's tree, not three (3) !!!!!
5 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2008
Wicked: Your suspicions could better be labelled superstitions. Since trees extract the Carbon they hold from atmospheric CO2, how it is re-released is relatively inconsequential to atmospheric CO2 levels, beyond occasional temporary sequestration in burried char or bogs. Fire, termites, other organisms, it makes little difference.

Can't believe i waste my time thus.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.