The three reports are based on longitudinal voter behaviour studies that started in 1979 and 1987. The new updates concern the period between the elections in 2006 and 2010. Maria Jarl, political scientist who is studying school politics, has observed some clear trends.
'School and education issues are perceived as increasingly important among voters,' she says. 'In 2010, 26 percent of the voters saw schooling and education as an important social issue, whereas 24 percent did in 2006. Following a decline since the turn of the millennium when the importance of school issues peaked, the curve turned upward around 2003-2004.'
The Liberal Party stands out as the most popular political party when it comes to school politics; in 2010, 45 percent of the voters liked the party's school politics, up from 36 percent in 2006. The Social Democrats are also receiving increasing support; their take on schooling and education was supported by 18 percent in 2006 and 23 percent in 2010. The voters' view of the Moderate Party's school politics remained constant; 21 percent of the voters liked the party's views of schooling and education in both years.
In line with the finding that more and more voters feel that schooling is an important social issue, it turns out that an increasing number of voters chose which party to vote for based on school politics. However, although this seems to be true for the electorate at large, the trend differs depending on the party.
'Compared to all other parties, the Liberal Party attracts a larger share of their voters through school politics,' says Jarl. '48 percent of those who voted for them said that their decision was largely based on school politics. In 2006 the number was 35 percent.'
'Not nearly as many Social Democratic voters chose what party to vote for based on school politics the shares were 23 percent in 2006 and 19 percent in 2010.'
Provided by University of Gothenburg
This Phys.org Science News Wire page contains a press release issued by an organization mentioned above and is provided to you “as is” with little or no review from Phys.Org staff.