<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>Phys.org: Phys.Org news tagged with: breast cancer screening</title>
<link>http://phys.org/</link>
<language>en-us</language> 
<description>Phys.org internet news portal provides the latest news on science including: Physics, Nanotechnology, Life Sciences, Space Science, Earth Science, Environment, Health and Medicine.</description>

 <item>
     <title>PSA test for men could get a second life for breast cancer in women</title>
   	 <description>The widely known PSA blood test for prostate cancer in men may get a second life as a much-needed new test for breast cancer, the most common form of cancer in women worldwide, scientists are reporting in a new study in the ACS journal Analytical Chemistry.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news229779221.html</link>
	 <category>Chemistry</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:40:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news229779221</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Yearly mammograms from age 40 save 71 percent more lives, study shows</title>
   	 <description>A new study questions the controversial U.S. Preventative Service Task Force recommendations for breast cancer screening, with data that shows starting at a younger age and screening more frequently will result in more lives saved.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news215358186.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:43:27 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news215358186</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Mammogram sensitivity depends on menstrual cycle</title>
   	 <description>Try to schedule your screening mammogram during the first week of your menstrual cycle. It might make breast cancer screening more accurate for pre-menopausal women who choose to have regular mammograms. This recommendation comes from an article published online December 3 in Radiology by Diana Miglioretti, PhD, a senior investigator at Group Health Research Institute.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news210870447.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:07:35 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news210870447</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New breast cancer screening put to test</title>
   	 <description>Researchers are preparing to launch a &amp;#163;1.6million trial of a new imaging technology to see if might be better at screening breast cancer.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news207559786.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:29:53 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news207559786</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/newbreastcan.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>Chicago racial disparities in breast cancer mortality significantly higher than national average</title>
   	 <description>Disparities in breast cancer mortality continue to be unacceptably high in Chicago and significantly larger than the national average according to new data released today at a rally sponsored by the Metropolitan Chicago Breast Cancer Task Force. The Task Force also announced results of the first year of data collection by the Chicago Breast Cancer Quality Consortium, which found many hospitals in Chicago are not meeting accepted quality standards.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news206886881.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:34:54 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news206886881</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Computer-aided detection is increasingly being used in screening and diagnostic mammography</title>
   	 <description>The use of computer-aided detection (CAD) is increasing, in both screening and diagnostic mammography, according to a study in the October issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology. CAD software systems highlight and alert the radiologist of abnormal areas of density, mass or calcification on a digitized mammographic image (of the breast) that may indicate the presence of cancer.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news205253297.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:48:30 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news205253297</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Age 50 as mammography screening threshold proven unfounded</title>
   	 <description>The landmark breast cancer screening study of women 40-49, published online in Cancer, has proven that annual mammography screening of women in their 40s reduces the breast cancer death rate in these women by nearly 30 percent. The results of this largest study ever conducted on women in this age group confirm that the use of the age of 50 as a threshold for breast cancer screening is scientifically unfounded. Women should begin getting annual mammograms at age 40.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news205061190.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:40:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news205061190</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New mammogram study stirs debate for women in 40s</title>
   	 <description>(AP) -- A new study from Sweden is stirring fresh debate over whether women in their 40s should get mammograms. It suggests that the breast cancer screening test can lower the risk of dying of the disease by 26 percent or more in this age group.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news204998843.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:20:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news204998843</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Doctors need to help patients prepare better for health decisions</title>
   	 <description>Twelve years ago, then 28-year-old graduate student Brian Zikmund-Fisher was forced into the toughest choice of his life: Die from a blood disorder within a few years or endure a bone marrow transplant that could cure him or kill him in weeks.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news204954773.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:53:29 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news204954773</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Breast cancer screening: No added value through mammography</title>
   	 <description>Do we need a revision of current recommendations for breast cancer screening? According to a recent prospective multicenter cohort study published in the &quot;Journal of Clinical Oncology&quot;, this appears advisable at least for young women carrying an increased risk of breast cancer.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news186409449.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:30:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news186409449</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Change in mammography guidelines questioned</title>
   	 <description>The methodology and evidence behind a widely publicized change in national mammography guidelines is questionable, according to a review in the Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography (JDMS), published by SAGE.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news183924712.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:50:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news183924712</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Elevated-risk women refuse MRI breast cancer screening</title>
   	 <description>In a new study published in the January issue of Radiology, 42 percent of women eligible for breast cancer screening with MRI declined to undergo the procedure.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news180684217.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:20:02 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news180684217</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Mammography may increase breast cancer risk in some high-risk women</title>
   	 <description>Low-dose radiation from annual mammography screening may increase breast cancer risk in women with genetic or familial predisposition to breast cancer, according to a study presented today at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news178868321.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:40:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news178868321</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>For many, mammography every other year has benefits of annual screening, but less harm</title>
   	 <description>A comprehensive analysis of various mammography screening schedules suggests that biennial (every two years) screening of average risk women between the ages of 50 and 74 achieves most of the benefits of annual screening, but with less harm.   The results represent a unanimous consensus of six independent research groups from various academic institutions.  Their findings are published in the November 17, 2009 Annals of Internal Medicine.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news177663689.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:40:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news177663689</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Piezoelectric Fingers Key in New Breast Cancer Detector</title>
   	 <description>(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at Drexel University are developing a new portable, low-cost, radiation-free breast cancer detector that can potentially be used in a doctor's office as a first-line to detect breast cancer.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news173004222.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:00:02 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news173004222</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Study: 1 in 3 breast cancer patients overtreated</title>
   	 <description>(AP) --  One in three breast cancer patients identified in public screening programs may be treated unnecessarily, a new study says. Karsten Jorgensen and Peter Gotzsche of the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen analyzed breast cancer trends at least seven years before and after government-run screening programs for breast cancer started in parts of Australia, Britain, Canada, Norway and Sweden.</description>
     <link>http://phys.org/news166434410.html</link>
	 <category>Medicine &amp; Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:47:09 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news166434410</guid>
	 
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
