Theoretical Physics: Dark matter and dark energy are different aspects of a single unknown force

Jul 01, 2004

In the last few decades, scientists have discovered that there is a lot more to the universe than meets the eye: The cosmos appears to be filled with not just one, but two invisible constituents-dark matter and dark energy-whose existence has been proposed based solely on their gravitational effects on ordinary matter and energy.
Now, theoretical physicist Robert J. Scherrer has come up with a model that could cut the mystery in half by explaining dark matter and dark energy as two aspects of a single unknown force.

His model is described in a paper titled "Purely Kinetic k Essence as Unified Dark Matter" published online by Physical Review Letters on June 30 and available online at arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0402316.

"One way to think of this is that the universe is filled with an invisible fluid that exerts pressure on ordinary matter and changes the way that the universe expands," says Scherrer, a professor of physics at Vanderbilt University.

According to Scherrer, his model is extremely simple and avoids the major problems that have characterized previous efforts to unify dark matter and dark energy.

In the 1970s, astrophysicists postulated the existence of invisible particles called dark matter in order to explain the motion of galaxies. Based on these observations, they estimate that there must be about 10 times as much dark matter in the universe as ordinary matter. One possible explanation for dark matter is that it is made up of a new type of particle (dubbed Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, or WIMPs) that don't emit light and barely interact with ordinary matter. A number of experiments are searching for evidence of these particles.

As if that weren't enough, in the 1990s along came dark energy, which produces a repulsive force that appears to be ripping the universe apart. Scientists invoked dark energy to explain the surprise discovery that the rate at which the universe is expanding is not slowing, as most cosmologists had thought, but is accelerating instead. According to the latest estimates, dark energy makes up 75 percent of the universe and dark matter accounts for another 23 percent, leaving ordinary matter and energy with a distinctly minority role of only 2 percent.

Scherrer's unifying idea is an exotic form of energy with well-defined but complicated properties called a scalar field. In this context, a field is a physical quantity possessing energy and pressure that is spread throughout space. Cosmologists first invoked scalar fields to explain cosmic inflation, a period shortly after the Big Bang when the universe appears to have undergone an episode of hyper-expansion, inflating billions upon billions of times in less than a second.

Specifically, Scherrer uses a second-generation scalar field, known as a
k-essence, in his model. K-essence fields have been advanced by Paul Steinhardt at Princeton University and others as an explanation for dark energy, but Scherrer is the first to point out that one simple type of k-essence field can also produce the effects attributed to dark matter.

Scientists differentiate between dark matter and dark energy because they seem to behave differently. Dark matter appears to have mass and to form giant clumps. In fact, cosmologists calculate that the gravitational attraction of these clumps played a key role in causing ordinary matter to form galaxies. Dark energy, by contrast, appears to be without mass and spreads uniformly throughout space where it acts as a kind of anti-gravity, a repulsive force that is pushing the universe apart.

K-essence fields can change their behavior over time. When investigating a very simple type of k-essence field-one in which potential energy is a constant-Scherrer discovered that as the field evolves, it passes through a phase where it can clump and mimic the effect of invisible particles followed by a phase when it spreads uniformly throughout space and takes on the characteristics of dark energy.

"The model naturally evolves into a state where it looks like dark matter for a while and then it looks like dark energy," Scherrer says. "When I realized this, I thought, 'This is compelling, let's see what we can do with it.'"

When he examined the model in more detail, Scherrer found that it avoids many of the problems that have plagued previous theories that attempt to unify dark matter and dark energy.

The earliest model for dark energy was made by modifying the general theory of relativity to include a term called the cosmological constant. This was a term that Einstein originally included to balance the force of gravity in order to form a static universe. But he cheerfully dropped the constant when astronomical observations of the day found it was not needed. Recent models reintroducing the cosmological constant do a good job of reproducing the effects of dark energy but do not explain dark matter.

One attempt to unify dark matter and dark energy, called the Chaplygin gas model, is based on work by a Russian physicist in the 1930s. It produces an initial dark matter-like stage followed by a dark energy-like evolution, but it has trouble explaining the process of galaxy formation.

Scherrer's formulation has some similarities to a unified theory proposed earlier this year by Nima Arkani-Hamed at Harvard University and his colleagues, who attempt to explain dark matter and dark energy as arising from the behavior of an invisible and omnipresent fluid that they call a "ghost condensate."

Although Scherrer's model has a number of positive features, it also has some drawbacks. For one thing, it requires some extreme "fine-tuning" to work. The physicist also cautions that more study will be required to determine if the model's behavior is consistent with other observations. In addition, it cannot answer the coincidence problem: Why we live at the only time in the history of the universe when the densities calculated for dark matter and dark energy are comparable. Scientists are suspicious of this because it suggests that there is something special about the present era.

Source: Vanderbilt University

Explore further: Unexpected new mechanism reveals how molecules become trapped in ice

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

An anomaly in satellite flybys confounds scientists

Sep 22, 2014

When space probes, such as Rosetta and Cassini, fly over certain planets and moons in order to gain momentum and travel long distances, their speed changes slightly for an unknown reason. A Spanish researcher ...

Recommended for you

Entanglement made tangible

16 hours ago

EPFL scientists have designed a first-ever experiment for demonstrating quantum entanglement in the macroscopic realm. Unlike other such proposals, the experiment is relatively easy to set up and run with existing semiconductor ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Yongkiwi
1 / 5 (2) May 12, 2009
Good job, Robert J. Scherrer. You are not only walking towards the right direction but also walking on the short-cut.


I believe that finding out where the force originally comes from and what the possible characters of the force are would help to identify it. I hope the following thoughts would help.

The force you are seeking for may be called O-Force--- The Original Force generated by Big Bang.

Similar to the gravity, O-Force is a directional force. But the difference between O-Force and gravity are:

1. The arrow of the force direction is pointing away from the very centre of the source and ended somewhere in the universe or no end at all.

2. The power of the force does not relate to any object with mass.

3. It is a single source: it exists regardless there are any other matters or not. If we draw a line to express this force, we would find that the very beginning of the line would be at the position of singularity or the point where the Big Bang happened.

As we know that gravity %u201Caccounts for the very existence of the Earth, the Sun, and most of the macroscopic objects in the universe%u201D. I imagine that the O-Force accounts for the very existence of the black holes, baby universes, galaxies, local universe and even entire multi-universe!.

In addition, the universe model you described here is nearly identical with the one I imagined as well if you put your universe to be among other similar ones together and form a multiverse model.

Here it is:

First, we put number of smaller balloons into a bigger one. Each small balloon is individually connected with a tube (suppose that the tubes are invisible). In turn the tube is connected to a pump, which is driven by a battery, to fill the balloons with different types of liquid. Some of the batteries are new and powerful and some of them are old and weak. Some also totally flat (those balloons are leaking and shrinking). This would make each balloon having different size and different internal force. All the balloons are closely aggregated together and been interacting each other at all time.


This would be what the part of the multiverse looks like from macroscopic point of view. Our universe is the one in the centre.


When we consider the interaction between our universe and neighbouring universes caused by each other%u2019s O-Force the mysteries puzzling us may be easier to be unlocked. Of cause to prove it is another thing.

At least with this model it would be very easy to explain why the speed of the universe expansion could change from fast to slow or from slow to fast. We can also explain in what condition the expansion of the universe would stop and how the Big Crunch would start. And more.


I hope this may help and I am looking forward to seeing you to prove above one day in the future.