Making decisions is the third way we learn, research shows

Oct 11, 2010 By Debbie Freeman
Making decisions is the third way we learn, research shows
W. P. Carey School of Business associate professor Pierre Balthazard's brain research helps show a third way we learn and make decisions.

Experts have long believed there are two main ways our brains work: cognition, which is thinking or processing information, and affect, which is feeling or emotion. However, a new breakthrough was just made in regard to a third faculty of the brain: conation.

“When people make ‘gut’ decisions or choices based on instinct, that’s really conation,” says Pierre Balthazard, associate professor in the W. P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University, who worked on the new research. “Conation has always taken a back seat to the other two faculties of the brain, but we were able to discover some key things about how it works.”

Balthazard recently analyzed the brains of more than 100 healthy people and found evidence they were all operating in the area of conation. Moreover, the findings indicate that people can be trained to compensate for strengths and weaknesses in conation, so their brains keep functioning efficiently, even in stressful situations.

Balthazard already was well-known for doing research in the area of how to map the brain for leadership qualities, using advanced techniques to analyze brain signals. His research is funded by the U.S. Department of Defense. In this case, he also worked with a world-renowned expert in the field of conation, Kathy Kolbe of the Phoenix-based Kolbe Corp., who has been assessing behaviors related to conation for 30 years. She created the basis for the new study, using data from a half-million people who completed her widely used Kolbe A Index.

“My theory was that conation is the one human factor that’s equal among all people; we all start with instinct, but it’s how we use it that gives us our unique character,” she said. “You can manage your response to a situation, but ultimately, you do that based on various strengths hard-wired into your brain. That’s exactly what our research found.”

Balthazard tested Kolbe’s theory by having subjects perform simple tasks. For example, he got a group of mostly high-level executives together at a table with several common objects on it, such as pencils and paper clips. He asked the participants to take one minute to rank the objects in order of importance. People’s strengths and weaknesses in the area of conation determined whether they easily performed the task or whether they found it very daunting and stressful. Balthazard could tell from brain-mapping the subjects beforehand exactly which ones would react in each way.

“We can demonstrate conative stress naturally occurring in business environments, too,” Balthazard said. “What’s important is to be able to identify people’s strengths and weaknesses in this area to help them compensate for various situations, so they aren’t wasting power and can keep functioning in an optimal way.”

Explore further: New insights into eyewitness memory from groundbreaking replication initiative

Related Stories

Broken bones and medication

Oct 05, 2010

Although one in four women over 50 develops osteoporosis, most are unaware they have the disease — something Professor Suzanne Cadarette would like to change.

Bones restored with dried plum in aging mice

Oct 06, 2010

A diet supplemented with powdered dried plum restored bone lost by mice during the course of normal aging, in a study led by a researcher at the San Francisco VA Medical Center.

Recommended for you

Mother-daughter research team studies severe-weather phobia

Sep 19, 2014

No one likes severe weather, but for some just the thought of a thunderstorm, tornado, hurricane or blizzard can severely affect their lives. When blood pressures spike, individuals obsessively monitor weather forecasts and ...

Study: Pupil size shows reliability of decisions

Sep 18, 2014

Te precision with which people make decisions can be predicted by measuring pupil size before they are presented with any information about the decision, according to a new study published in PLOS Computational Bi ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DWCrmcm
5 / 5 (2) Oct 11, 2010
While I agree that there are "three ways" (innately intrinsically, and abstractly), this doesn't really tell us anything.
conation?
One can't prove one theory by using another theory.
Instinct?
One can't prove one theory by using another theory.

AdamCC
1 / 5 (1) Oct 11, 2010
It would be REALLY interesting to have the people in this study do brain mapping on the subjects of this one: http://www.physor...342.html
DavidPodger
not rated yet Oct 12, 2010
Most interesting! My interest is in building interactive case studies that run on the web. An early attempt was Quandary (Half-Baked Potatoe), but I think this approach can be considerably enhanced. The visitor to such a website is really badgered for decisions. Their reaction times etc and choices all measurable and collectable. Facinating that someone thinks this is so fundamental to thinking.
DavidPodger
not rated yet Oct 12, 2010
Disclaimer: I had no part at all in the authoring of Quandary.
zyan
not rated yet Oct 12, 2010
Define "instinct".
dains
not rated yet Nov 07, 2010
Hmm, all it really seems to prove is that making choices enables learning, even if the method is irrational.