Researchers call for a price cap on cigarette profits

Oct 05, 2010

An independent regulatory agency is needed to cap the excessive profits made by cigarette manufacturers, say researchers from the University of Bath.

Cigarette manufacturers currently make roughly double the profits of most other companies. The creation of an ‘Ofsmoke’ agency to regulate the industry would increase tax revenue and protect public health, according to the article published in the journal .

Professor Anna Gilmore, from the University’s Department for Health and the UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies; Dr Robert Branston, from the School of Management; and Professor David Sweanor from the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, say that capping the pre-tax cigarette manufacturers’ price would safeguard society from the market failure behind manufacturers’ pricing power and profits.

would set a maximum price that cigarette companies could charge for their product, based on an assessment of genuine operational costs. Retail mark-up would not be affected, or the price that consumers pay, but the excess profit currently accrued by cigarette manufacturers would be transferred to the national treasury through increased tax.

The system would be set up at no cost to the consumer or taxpayer, funded instead through a levy or licence fee paid by tobacco companies.

Dr Robert Branston, Deputy Director of the University’s Centre for Governance & Regulation, said: “A handful of companies dominate the market and cream off massive profits. With such a deadly product, competition isn’t attractive, so we’ve identified regulation as an alternative that stands to benefit both government and public health.

“The market has failed to curb cigarette manufacturers in terms of pricing power and profit, and tobacco control policies have unintentionally exacerbated the problem.

“Clamping down on the extreme profitability of cigarettes would reduce the incentive for tobacco companies to fight public health measures and mean they have fewer funds at their disposal.

“A move to regulation would enable tobacco control policies to be expanded as companies would be partially insulated against impact on revenue and less able to argue against them.”

He went on to say that regulation would also be a way of preventing people from down-trading to cheaper products and restraining the behaviour of companies when it comes to cigarette smuggling and marketing to young people.

“The tobacco industry is likely to argue that this type of direct economic regulation is an extreme reaction, but it’s hard to argue that nothing should be done given the extent of market power that these firms are enjoying and the number of deaths the sector causes,” said Dr Branston.

The paper is based on the UK but researchers are confident that the system could be applied to most markets.

They are planning further research to quantify the tax benefits of regulation and its affect on tobacco manufacturers.

Explore further: Physicist creates ice cream that changes colors as it's licked

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Tobacco smuggling is killing more people than illegal drugs

Oct 10, 2008

Tobacco smuggling causes around 4,000 premature deaths a year—four times the number of deaths caused by the use of all smuggled illegal drugs put together—but the UK government is not doing enough to tackle the problem, ...

Lighting up the powerful global smoking lobby

Jan 17, 2008

Global public health efforts to reduce smoking are at odds with the interests of the tobacco industry. According to a case study published in the online open access journal Globalization and Health, competing tobacco compan ...

Recommended for you

F1000Research brings static research figures to life

Jul 30, 2014

F1000Research today published new research from Bjorn Brembs, professor of neurogenetics at the Institute of Zoology, Universitaet Regensburg, in Germany, with a proof-of-concept figure allowing readers and reviewers to run ...

How science can beat the flawed metric that rules it

Jul 30, 2014

In order to improve something, we need to be able to measure its quality. This is true in public policy, in commercial industries, and also in science. Like other fields, science has a growing need for quantitative ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mertzj
not rated yet Oct 05, 2010
better yet tobacco should be illegal!
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 05, 2010
better yet tobacco should be illegal!


It should be illegal, but then the government wouldn't be able to tax it and spend the money on their corrupt, self indulgent programs (such as museums and libraries named in their own honor, slush funds, bail outs, etc).

You see, due to the modern perverted interpretation of the bill of Rights and the exclusion of God from everything, we cannot say what "Good" and "evil" are in terms of the U.S. legal system anyway.

Thus the way the government deals with immorality, corruption, crime, and disease is to simply let it happen, and then "patch" the problem after it happens by imposing fines and wrist slap prison sentences on offendors, and then "compensating" the victims from time to time.

In order to employ this self-defeating philosophy they need agencies and cash to fund them, so they elect to tax the source of the problem (i.e. cigarettes and alcohol,) while leaving it legal (soon marijauna,) rather than banning it altogether.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 05, 2010


panorama
not rated yet Oct 05, 2010
@QC My ghod is better than your god...and mine smokes...
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 05, 2010
@QC My ghod is better than your god...and mine smokes...


So then you admit God exists?

Tell me, who is your god?

The Book of Daniel shows us that there is only one true God. All other claims to deity are imposters.

There is only one true God and only one true Christ, which is Jesus, who died and rose from the dead to purchase our eternal salvation and forgiveness.