Genetically altered trees, plants could help counter global warming

Oct 01, 2010

Forests of genetically altered trees and other plants could sequester several billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere each year and so help ameliorate global warming, according to estimates published in the October issue of BioScience.

The study, by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, outlines a variety of strategies for augmenting the processes that use to sequester carbon dioxide from the air and convert it into long-lived forms of carbon, first in vegetation and ultimately in soil.

Besides increasing the efficiency of plants' absorption of light, researchers might be able to genetically alter plants so they send more carbon into their roots--where some may be converted into and remain out of circulation for centuries. Other possibilities include altering plants so that they can better withstand the stresses of growing on marginal land, and so that they yield improved bioenergy and . Such innovations might, in combination, boost substantially the amount of carbon that vegetation naturally extracts from air, according to the authors' estimates.

The researchers stress that the use of genetically engineered plants for is only one of many policy initiatives and technical tools that might boost the carbon sequestration already occurring in natural vegetation and crops.

The article, by Christer Jansson, Stan D. Wullschleger, Udaya C. Kalluri, and Gerald A. Tuskan, is the first in a Special Section in the October BioScience that includes several perspectives on the prospects for enhancing biological carbon sequestration. Other articles in the section analyze the substantial ecological and economic constraints that limit such efforts. One article discusses the prospects for sequestering carbon by culturing algae to produce biofuel feedstocks; one proposes a modification of the current regulatory climate for producing genetically engineered trees in the United States; and one discusses societal perceptions of the issues surrounding the use of genetically altered organisms to ameliorate warming attributed to the buildup of greenhouse gases.

Explore further: Iberian pig genome remains unchanged after five centuries

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Burying crop residues at sea may help reduce global warming

Feb 02, 2009

Imagine a massive international effort to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide - build up in the atmosphere. It involves gathering billions of tons of cornstalks, wheat straw, and other crop residue from farm ...

CO2 effects on plants increases global warming

May 03, 2010

Trees and other plants help keep the planet cool, but rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are turning down this global air conditioner. According to a new study by researchers at the Carnegie ...

Recommended for you

Iberian pig genome remains unchanged after five centuries

16 hours ago

A team of Spanish researchers have obtained the first partial genome sequence of an ancient pig. Extracted from a sixteenth century pig found at the site of the Montsoriu Castle in Girona, the data obtained indicates that ...

New concepts based on advances in animal systematics

19 hours ago

The way in which most multicellular organisms have been classified has been the same for more than a century. Only recently have scientists developed the tools and knowledge to question the way we classify ...

New dawn for pasta wheat in Australia

22 hours ago

The University of Adelaide's durum breeding program today at the Hart Field Day will release a new durum wheat variety called DBA-Aurora which promises a step-change in potential durum production in southern Australia.

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
5 / 5 (1) Oct 01, 2010
Ho ho! The confluence of Genetic Manipulation of GAIA and her hot flashes.

Don't you know that GAIA's acolytes eschew GM?
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 01, 2010
If the government is going to tax carbon production by $30 per ton shouldn't they also PAY $30 per ton to people and companies per ton of negative net carbon?
Kev_C
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
I wonder why they can't stop creating carbon in the atmosphere? It seems like that should be the real goal here not screwing around yet again with Mother Nature. No doubt the GM traits will be up for substantial patent profits should anyone inadvertently have a seed sow itself on their land.
How about we invest all that money into developing sustainable energy sources instead of messing things up even further?
Oh but of course that's not profitable is it?
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
Kev_C:

Precisely. In capitalism there is no motivation to solve problems, only motivation to keep customers coming back for more "fixes".
marjon
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
Kev_C:

Precisely. In capitalism there is no motivation to solve problems, only motivation to keep customers coming back for more "fixes".

That IS the motivation of any successful business, meet the needs of their customers. If the business can't solve the problem the customer seeks a competitor.

Now the AGWites face a dilemma, using genetic engineering, something they oppose, to solve their 'problem'.
Had the AGWites advocated technology and markets instead of socialism 20 years ago, imagine what could have been accomplished.
marjon
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
wonder why they can't stop creating carbon in the atmosphere?

It is called nuclear power.
Humans have been 'screwing' with Mother Nature for centuries. Ever seen the original wild corn plant? Not much to look at, but centuries of 'screwing' with it produced what we have today.
As for seeds drifting on someone else's property, the seed violated the property rights of the owner and the land owner has the right to sue the the owner of the seed, if one exists.
It is in the interests of GM seed companies to keep their products contained. Of course they will bribe some politician to make 'regulations' to limit their liability of their products and if seeds drift, require property owners to return the product. That is the fault of a corrupt govt, not the GM company.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
That IS the motivation of any successful business, meet the needs of their customers. If the business can't solve the problem the customer seeks a competitor.


Across the board, automobiles verifiably get same or worse mileage than they did 20 years ago, and they break down more often.
marjon
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
That IS the motivation of any successful business, meet the needs of their customers. If the business can't solve the problem the customer seeks a competitor.


Across the board, automobiles verifiably get same or worse mileage than they did 20 years ago, and they break down more often.

Not in my experience and the data does not indicate this either.
marjon
not rated yet Oct 02, 2010
"When the founder of the Whole Earth Catalog embraces nuclear power, genetically engineered crops, and geoengineering schemes to cool the planet, you know things have changed in the environmental movement. "
http://e360.yale....?id=2227
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 03, 2010
Marjon:

88 mazda and 87 toyota trucks got better mileage than anything currently even claims to get.

I used to get 30 to 35mpg in my 88 mazda when it was already 10 to 13 years old.

The same was true for my parents' first two toyota trucks.
marjon
not rated yet Oct 03, 2010
Marjon:

88 mazda and 87 toyota trucks got better mileage than anything currently even claims to get.

I used to get 30 to 35mpg in my 88 mazda when it was already 10 to 13 years old.

The same was true for my parents' first two toyota trucks.

What were the safety and emission requirement differences?
I used to get 30 to 35mpg in my 88 mazda when it was already 10 to 13 years old.

So? My mother gets +30mpg on a Buick Leucerne. A much nicer and larger car.