Congress backs Obama plan on NASA's future

Sep 30, 2010 By JIM ABRAMS , Associated Press Writer
In this image provided by NASA shows the view out of the Cupola window shows the Soyuz 23S, “Olympus” module docked to the nadir side of the International Space Station taken by astronaut Douglas Wheelock as the space station was passing over the majestic snow-capped Caucuses. The sun rising and reflecting off the Caspian Sea. (AP Photo/NASA - Douglas Wheelock)

(AP) -- Congress approved a blueprint for NASA's future Wednesday that extends the life of the space shuttle program for a year while backing President Barack Obama's intent to use commercial carriers to lift humans into near-Earth space.

The bill passed by the House on a 304-118 vote brings major changes to NASA's agenda: It dismantles the Constellation program under which former President George W. Bush sought to return astronauts to the moon, and extends the life of the from 2015 to 2020. The Senate passed the measure last month.

The bill relies mainly on the still-nascent commercial space industry to transport astronauts to the space station over the next five years. But in a nod to lawmakers concerned about NASA employees being laid off, it also continues to fund the shuttle program through the end of the current budget year a year from now. That would allow one last space shuttle mission following the mission planned for February.

Charles Bolden Jr. said the bill, which approves more than $58 billion in spending over the next three years, would foster the president's goals of extending the life of the space station, launching a commercial space transportation industry, fostering new technology and creating thousands of new jobs.

Obama, in pushing for the end of the Constellation program, said it was implausible under current budget restraints and that NASA was siphoning off funds from other programs. He told NASA workers at Cape Canaveral, Fla., in April that he was committed to manned space flight and envisioned sending astronauts to near-Earth asteroids in the near future as a prelude to trips to Mars in the coming decades.

His plan met resistance from the space industry, former astronauts and lawmakers who said it was risky to put too much reliance on commercial flights while NASA develops a next-generation heavy-lift rocket to carry people to those asteroids and Mars.

The compromise bill approved by the Senate last month goes along with most of Obama's goals while extending the life of the shuttle and directing NASA to move immediately to develop the next heavy launch vehicle.

The chairman of the House Science and Technology Committee, Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., said he was accepting the Senate version to ensure stability and clarity to the workforce, but he had several concerns, including the cost of extending the shuttle program and the lack of a timetable for a government backup capability to commercial flights.

He said he would continue to press his views as the House determines actual spending levels for the 2011 fiscal year that begins Friday.

Explore further: Is Phobos doomed?

More information: The bill is S. 3729. Online: Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

5 /5 (9 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US Senate votes to extend space shuttle program

Jul 16, 2010

A key Senate panel approved Thursday a 2011 budget proposal for the US space agency NASA that would extend the space shuttle program in a compromise from the Obama administration's demands.

NASA chief charts agency's shuttle-less future

Apr 08, 2010

(AP) -- NASA may not be going to the moon anytime soon and its space shuttles are about to be retired, but it could conceivably increase the number of agency jobs under a new reorganization, NASA's chief ...

Funding threatens US return to moon by 2020

Jun 18, 2009

US ambitions of returning to the moon by 2020 and then heading to Mars risk being grounded because of "unrealistic" funds allocated to NASA, said Senator Bill Nelson, a former space shuttle astronaut.

NASA to get more money, but must scratch moon plan

Jan 28, 2010

(AP) -- President Barack Obama is essentially grounding efforts to return astronauts to the moon and instead is sending NASA in new directions with roughly $6 billion more, according to officials familiar with the plans.

Obama's NASA plans may be in trouble

May 07, 2010

President Barack Obama's grand plans for NASA appear in big trouble. Three weeks after Obama told an audience at Kennedy Space Center that he wants to land astronauts on an asteroid by 2025, Congress remains unconvinced, ...

Recommended for you

Iridium flares captured in real time by astrophotographer

6 hours ago

There are so many fun sights to see in the sky that are pure astronomical magic. And then there are the spectacular human-created sights. One of those sights is watching satellites from the Iridium constellation ...

Is Phobos doomed?

6 hours ago

"All these worlds are yours except Europa, attempt no landing there."

Espresso in space

9 hours ago

Espresso-loving astronauts, rejoice! You may soon be able to enjoy your beloved beverage in space, thanks to a new cup designed specifically to defy the low-gravity environments encountered aboard the International ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BuddyEbsen
5 / 5 (1) Sep 30, 2010
I think its the Caucasus Mountains, unless the caption is referring to some snow-capped caucuses in Congress. Would they be visible from space?
AkiBola
5 / 5 (3) Sep 30, 2010
Obama said "...it was implausible under current budget restraints ...". Hilarious stuff. Trillions of taxpayer dollars are thrown at bankers and yesteryear unions, but austerity for the future of US spaceflight and technology. Here's the crazy sad part, you'll hear people saying about the NASA budget "it could have been worse". Just how low can we set the bar? LOL.
James007E
not rated yet Sep 30, 2010
Obama do not know the truth about the History about the Moon. He will think that Mars are closer, But he did not study the area about the Moon closest planet. Not Mars area very danger.
Not the Moon. If the Moon are danger they could leave fast, Not Mars it can take a long jounery to the Earth. But they could die. That is very bad.
James007E
not rated yet Sep 30, 2010
Anytime you think the Moon are our Base to Plan in or around it. The Moon is more save if you plan it.
Why do you think Mars save. Anything goes wrong you go to Earth. But Mars you needed large ship to fly on. Moon could become other Living Areas.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.