Diller bearish on future of Ask.com

Sep 29, 2010
IAC chief executive Barry Diller, pictured in 2009, said Wednesday he does not expect Ask.com, the Internet search engine bought for 1.85 billion dollars five years ago, to ever be more than a "niche" service.

IAC chief executive Barry Diller said Wednesday he does not expect Ask.com, the Internet search engine bought for 1.85 billion dollars five years ago, to ever be more than a "niche" service.

Diller, speaking at a conference hosted here by technology blog TechCrunch, said was not the powerhouse of the lucrative search and advertising market it is today when e-commerce group IAC bought Ask.com.

"Google was at that time on the verge -- but not there yet -- of becoming a verb," he said. "I had thought then that if you really innovated... you could compete and you could gain share.

"What I hoped would happen, hasn't," he said. "We didn't gain share and I don't think we're going to gain share. We've held it, which actually to me is a bit of a miracle in itself."

According to digital tracking firm comScore, Ask.com, previously known as Ask Jeeves, had a 3.8 percent share of the in the United States in August.

Google had a 65.4 percent market share, followed by Yahoo! with 17.4 percent and Microsoft with 11.1 percent, according to comScore.

Diller said Ask.com will focus on a new offering rolled out in July in which real human beings help answer questions.

"We have a new concept. I don't know if it's going to work or not," he said.

"I think there is a course in which we could be competitive, not competitive to Google, unfortunately nobody's competition to Google now... Hopefully we can, in a niche way, provide a decent service."

Acknowledging that Ask.com has little if any "meaningful value," Diller said other IAC properties have "huge potential," citing dating site Match.com, news and blog site The Daily Beast and video sharing site Vimeo.

The IAC CEO also said he expects Internet users to start paying for "premium content" in three to five years, calling any notion that all Internet content is free an "absurd concept."

"I think commodity content is not worth very much, it's worth something but not very much," he added.

"Premium content is worth what the consumer will pay for it."

He said people would begin paying for content on the Web "once you get mechanisms where it is easy to pay for, once you get subscription systems and other things that are very easy for people to do like iTunes."

"I do think eventually The Daily Beast will have two revenue streams, it'll have advertising revenue and it'll have subscription revenue," he added.

Explore further: A Closer Look: Your (online) life after death

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

IAC reports 3Q profit but ad revenue still slips

Oct 27, 2009

(AP) -- IAC/InterActiveCorp, which runs Match.com, Ask.com and other Web sites, said Tuesday that asset sales helped it profit in the third quarter while advertising revenue continued to slump.

IAC has 2Q profit; revenue falls in weak ad market

Jul 29, 2009

(AP) -- IAC/InterActiveCorp, the company behind such Internet properties as Match.com, Ask and Citysearch, posted a second-quarter profit that fell short of analyst expectations Wednesday and indicated the online ad market ...

Bing posts modest US search market gain in December

Jan 15, 2010

Microsoft's new Internet search engine Bing posted a modest gain in its share of the US search market in December while partner Yahoo! saw its share dip slightly, online tracking firm comScore said.

Microsoft tops Yahoo! in search in August: Nielsen

Sep 14, 2010

Microsoft's Bing and other Internet search services overtook Yahoo! for the first time to become the number two search engine in the United States in August, The Nielsen Co. said Tuesday.

Online ad improvement seen in IAC's 4Q loss

Feb 09, 2010

(AP) -- Internet company IAC/InterActiveCorp lost $1 billion in the fourth quarter because it wrote down the value of its search business, but the results beat expectations and offered the latest indication that the online ...

Recommended for you

A Closer Look: Your (online) life after death

6 hours ago

Sure, you have a lot to do today—laundry, bills, dinner—but it's never too early to start planning for your digital afterlife, the fate of your numerous online accounts once you shed this mortal coil.

Web filter lifts block on gay sites

7 hours ago

A popular online safe-search filter is ending its practice of blocking links to mainstream gay and lesbian advocacy groups for users hoping to avoid obscene sites.

Protecting infrastructure with smarter CPS

14 hours ago

Security of IT networks is continually being improved to protect against malicious hackers. Yet when IT networks interface with infrastructures such as water and electric systems to provide monitoring and control capabilities, ...

Apple helps iTunes users delete free U2 album

Sep 15, 2014

Apple on Monday began helping people boot U2 off their iTunes accounts after a cacophony of complaints about not wanting the automatically downloaded free album by the Irish rock band.

Habitual Facebook users: Suckers for social media scams?

Sep 15, 2014

A new study finds that habitual use of Facebook makes individuals susceptible to social media phishing attacks by criminals, likely because they automatically respond to requests without considering how they are connected ...

YouTube to go offline in India on Android phones

Sep 15, 2014

YouTube users in India will soon be able to save videos from the Google-owned service, making it possible to watch them offline, and the feature will eventually be available globally, the company said Monday.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

philosothink
not rated yet Oct 07, 2010
I personally am one of the 3.8%, I only use Google when Ask fails to find something. Google has gone down the untrustworthy path a bit often with people's personal information. I chose not to support them.

I also do not use "google" as a verb, or think it's a catchy name, I find it lame actually! :)

I believe if Ask purposefully advertised no snooping and kept to a strict policy of keeping that type of thing off their search engine, they would get bigger market share.