Elpida develops industry's smallest 30nm process 2-Gigabit DDR3 SDRAM

Sep 29, 2010

Elpida Memory, Inc., Japan's global supplier of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), today announced that it had completed development of a 30nm process 2-gigabit DDR3 SDRAM.

The new 2-gigabit DDR3 SDRAM used 30nm-level advanced process migration technology to create the DRAM industry's smallest-level 2-gigabit DDR3 SDRAM. It achieves 45% more chips per wafer compared with Elpida's 40nm process products. Also, the new process design developed by Elpida will help contain rising chip costs associated with process migration. As a result, the 2-gigabit DDR3 is slated to become an extremely cost-competitive product.

Elpida's new chip meets the JEDEC specs for the high-speed DDR3-1866 and 1.35V low-voltage, high-speed DDR3L-1600 , both expected to become mainstream industry products in 2011. Also, the 30nm DDR3 SDRAM is eco-friendly. As a DDR3 SDRAM it achieves one of the industry's lowest levels of electric current usage (approximately 15% less operating and approximately 10% less standby usage compared with Elpida's 40nm products), which contributes to lower PC and digital consumer electronics .

Elpida plans to begin sample shipments of the newly developed DDR3 SDRAM in December 2010. Volume production is expected to commence in the same month.

Elpida will apply the new 30nm process technology to its Mobile RAM products. The company also plans to use the process together with Through Silicon Via (TSV) technology to support one-chip memory solutions for mobile phones, digital still cameras and PC DRAMs.

Explore further: Irish bookmaker apologizes for 2010 data breach

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Elpida Begins Mass Production of 40nm 2-Gigabit DDR3 SDRAM

Dec 22, 2009

Elpida Memory, Japan's leading global supplier of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), today announced that its Hiroshima Plant has begun volume production of 40nm process 2-gigabit DDR3 SDRAMs. Since completing development ...

Elpida Completes Development of 50nm Process DDR3 SDRAM

Nov 26, 2008

Elpida Memory, Japan's leading global supplier of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), today announced that it has completed development of a 50nm process DDR3 SDRAM. The new DRAM product features the lowest power consumption ...

Recommended for you

Apple closes acquisition of Beats music

1 hour ago

Apple said Friday it closed its $3 billion deal for Beats, the high-end audio equipment and streaming music service, a tie-up that could allow the iPhone maker to reach new audiences.

Researchers jailbreak iOS 7.1.2

3 hours ago

Security researchers at the Georgia Tech Information Security Center (GTISC) have discovered a way to jailbreak current generation Apple iOS devices (e.g., iPhones and iPads) running the latest iOS software.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
5 / 5 (2) Sep 29, 2010
What gives?

Based on simple geometry, they should have been able to fit about 77.77% more chips per wafer...

Is the 32.72% discrepancy represented entirely by circuitry for buses and power supply of the chips?

It would seem that the transistors are miniaturizing faster than the wiring, and that moreover, the law of large numbers is at play because the wires and other "logic" and power is taking up a higher and higher percentage of the chip's area and volume as compared to individual transistors.
plasma_guy
5 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2010
What gives?

Based on simple geometry, they should have been able to fit about 77.77% more chips per wafer...

Is the 32.72% discrepancy represented entirely by circuitry for buses and power supply of the chips?

It would seem that the transistors are miniaturizing faster than the wiring, and that moreover, the law of large numbers is at play because the wires and other "logic" and power is taking up a higher and higher percentage of the chip's area and volume as compared to individual transistors.


I think that is a good point and also the scaling may not be exactly 40 nm to 30 nm but 40-something to 30-something. It is interesting they can do something this aggressive. Maybe they are trying to match Samsung's pace.