Less pain for learning gain: Research offers a strategy to increase learning with less effort

Sep 22, 2010 By Wendy Leopold

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists long have recognized that many perceptual skills important for language comprehension and reading can be enhanced through practice. Now research from Northwestern University suggests a new way of training that could reduce by at least half the effort previously thought necessary to make learning gains.

The research also may be the first behavioral demonstration of metaplasticity -- the idea that experiences that on their own do not generate can influence how effective later experiences are at generating learning.

"Prior to our work much of the research into perceptual learning could be summed up as 'no pain, no gain,'" says Beverly Wright, first author of a study in the Sept. 22 and communication sciences and disorders professor at Northwestern. "Our work suggests that you can have the same gain in learning with substantially less pain."

The findings could lead to less effortful therapies for children who suffer from language learning impairments involving . And they hold potential for members of the general population with an interest in enhancing perceptual abilities -- for musicians seeking to sharpen their sensitivity to sound, people studying a second language or physicians learning to tell the difference between regular and irregular heartbeats.

Previous research showed that individuals become better at many perceptual tasks by performing them again and again, typically making the training tedious and long in length. It also showed that mere exposure to the perceptual stimuli used during practice on these tasks does not generate learning.

But the Northwestern researchers found that robust learning occurred when they combined periods of practice that alone were too brief to cause learning with periods of mere exposure to perceptual stimuli. "To our surprise, we found that two 'wrongs' actually can make a right when it comes to perceptual learning," says Wright.

What's more, they found that the combination led to gains that were equal to the learning gains made by participants who performed twice as much continuous task training (training which by nature of its repetition and length often is onerous).

"It's as though once you get your system revved up by practicing a particular skill, the brain acts as though you are still engaged in the task when you are not and learning still takes place," says Wright, who teaches in Northwestern's School of Communication.

Wright and Northwestern researchers Andrew Sabin, Yuxuan Zhang, Nicole Marrone and Matthew Fitzgerald worked with four groups of adult participants aged 18 to 30 years with normal hearing and no previous experience with psychoacoustic tasks. Their goal was to improve participants' ability to discriminate between the pitches of different tones.

The researchers initially determined the smallest difference in pitch that participants could discriminate from a 1,000 Hertz standard tone. They then divided the participants into four groups, each of which went through a different training regimen.

Participants in one group were trained for 20 minutes per day for a week on the pitch-discrimination task. Over and over again, they were asked to tell the difference between the 1,000 Hertz tone and a lower tone but showed no improvement.

Of greatest importance for the study, participants in a second group showed significant learning gains when the same amount of target task training (20 minutes) was combined with 20 minutes of work on an unrelated puzzle while repeatedly presenting a 1,000 Hertz tone through headphones.

Impressively, the learning of the second group also was comparable to that of a third group that for a week practiced the pitch-discrimination target task for 40 minutes per day.

A fourth group of participants repeatedly exposed to a 1,000 Hertz tone for 40 minutes per day while performing an unrelated task showed no learning gains.

Further experiments revealed that the order of presentation -- whether the 20 minutes of target task training occurred before or after the 20 minutes of the related task - did not affect learning. Each scenario yielded equal pitch discrimination learning gains.

In addition, the researchers discovered that the effectiveness of the combination of the target task training and of the unrelated training plus stimuli presentation began declining if the two tasks were separated by more than 15 minutes. Pitch discrimination learning - or evidence of metaplasticity -- disappeared completely if the sessions were separated by four hours.

Explore further: Lost memories might be able to be restored, new study indicates

More information: The article in the Journal of Neuroscience (Sept. 22, 2010) is titled "Enhancing Perceptual Learning by Combining Practice with Additional Sensory Stimulation." www.jneurosci.org/

Related Stories

Multi-sensory training: Faster learning

Aug 15, 2006

U.S. scientists from Boston University and UCLA say the use of multi-sensory training programs helps people improve low-level perceptual task learning.

Reward elicits unconscious learning in humans

Mar 11, 2009

A new study challenges the prevailing assumption that you must pay attention to something in order to learn it. The research, published by Cell Press in the March 12th issue of the journal Neuron, demonstrates that stimul ...

Recommended for you

Researchers unlock mystery of skin's sensory abilities

Dec 19, 2014

Humans' ability to detect the direction of movement of stimuli in their sensory world is critical to survival. Much of this stimuli detection comes from sight and sound, but little is known about how the ...

Tackling neurotransmission precision

Dec 18, 2014

Behind all motor, sensory and memory functions, calcium ions are in the brain, making those functions possible. Yet neuroscientists do not entirely understand how fast calcium ions reach their targets inside ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Skultch
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2010
Let's see if I get this right. They're saying I should study one thing for 20 minutes, then switch to a different subject for another 20 minutes. Then, it will be like I studied both for 40 minutes each?
laserdaveb
Sep 22, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Pyle
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2010
This is almost a "no kidding" result. If you practice a piece of music for 20 minutes and then do something else while listening to the piece for 20 more minutes the learning is equivalent to 40 minutes of practicing. Whereas, just listening, or practicing for only 20 minutes is less effective. Seems straightforward to me. Makes sense when you think about sports too and watching tape.

Next step could be looking at saturation limits and seeing where there is a drop off in effectiveness with different learning mix strategies.
knikiy
5 / 5 (3) Sep 22, 2010
I think a 1,000 Hertz tone for 40 minutes per day would drive me clean bonkers. The only thing I'd want to learn is how to turn off the damn tone.
StarDust21
1 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2010
talk about making a news acticle from no real news to begin with..........
satyricon
1 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2010
I dislike these article titles. The gossip magazine equivalent headlines of research article titles.
DozerIAm
5 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2010
This makes sense to me, its kinda nice to see my qualitative perceptions quantified. As a musician, when I take on a new, unfamiliar song, I will listen to it several times thru, then actually play parts of it and work on it, then go back to listening to it. It helps me "absorb" the piece, I refer to it as osmosis jokingly, but seeing its not just me, is, as I said before, nice.

I wonder if this is related to the benefits of training by visualization, which athletes reoutinely do.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.