The science behind deception

Sep 20, 2010

Think you can tell when people are lying? After decades of accepted methods for detecting lies, communications PhD student Edward Reynolds may have a case for challenging those tactics.

Using popular television programs Cops and The Jeremy Kyle Show, Reynolds studied response latencies between questions and answers.

Mr. Reynolds spent hours studying footage, looking for instances where a lie and an admission were both on tape.

Historically, experts have used speech tempos to determine lying, and suggested long pauses between questions and answers imply responders may be telling a lie.

Mr. Reynolds found regular gaps in respondent answers occurred equally in both lies and non-lie replies.

"Silence is used in talk for a range of interaction functions, and is not just a cue that could indicate ," he said.

In the past, have used participants in controlled experiments, whereas Mr. Reynolds observed the television guests in a natural setting, using the sociological method of "conversation analysis" to analyse the lies, similar to an .

"I was actually expecting to find some evidence of any sort of 'cue to deception' in my data, when I found none I was surprised," he said.

Published in the British Journal of Social Psychology, the research highlights the need to analyse lies in the context they are told.

Mr. Reynolds also emphasizes the importance of taking the conversation leading up to the question into account.

"For professionals who need to detect lying, this research means they should pay more attention to what they already know about the person, rather than 'cues'," he said.

Mr. Reynolds' investigation concluded that blame shifting responses are often indicators of upcoming "trouble", rather than being directly related to lying.

"Future research cannot overlook the research in conversational analysis and , which have investigated the same phenomena in speech, like umm's and pauses," he said.

For those trying to detect fibbers, Mr Reynolds said trusting your instincts is always a good move.

"If there is something odd in the way someone talks, use your own social skills to work it out; hi-tech science can't do any better than 'natural' ways to detect lies," he said.

Explore further: Digital native fallacy: Teachers still know better when it comes to using technology

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study: Execs blinded by bottom line

Jan 09, 2006

A researcher says corporations like Enron that overemphasize profits might make their leaders blind to ethical or moral issues.

Eddies against the wall

Jul 27, 2010

Fluids experts writing in the journal Physics of Fluids, which is published by the American Institute of Physics, are projecting it will be many decades before we can accurately probe the properties of turbulence near walls. ...

Setting sail in an ecological 'Earthship'

Oct 13, 2009

Could sustainable architecture address pollution, climate change and resource depletion by helping us build self-sufficient, off-grid, housing from "waste", including vehicle tires and metal drinks containers? That's the ...

Trusting people make better lie detectors

Aug 13, 2010

Trusting others may not make you a fool or a Pollyanna, according to a study in the current Social Psychological and Personality Science. Instead it can be a sign that you're smart.

Recommended for you

Gypsies and travellers on the English Green Belt

Oct 17, 2014

The battle between Gypsies, Travellers and the settled community over how land can be used has moved to the Green Belt, observes Peter Kabachnik of the City University of New York.

Cadavers beat computers for learning anatomy

Oct 16, 2014

Despite the growing popularity of using computer simulation to help teach college anatomy, students learn much better through the traditional use of human cadavers, according to new research that has implications ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ArtflDgr
1 / 5 (4) Sep 20, 2010
finally, a scicnece that the soviets can dominate, with other marxists...
Corban
1 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2010
Okay Dr. Pepper. Next you'll tell us to try a somersault!